Search

Frailty is associated with adverse health outcomes in ageing populations, yet its long-term effect on the development of disability is not well defined. The study examines to what extent frailty affects disability trajectories over 15 years in older adults aged 50+. Using seven waves of data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), the study estimates the effect of baseline frailty on subsequent disability trajectories by multilevel growth curve models. The sample included 94 360 individuals from 28 European countries. Baseline frailty was assessed at baseline, using the sex-specific SHARE-Frailty-Instrument (SHARE-FI), including weight loss, exhaustion, muscle weakness, slowness, and low physical activity. Disability outcomes were the sum score of limitations in activities of daily living (ADL) and Instrumental ADL (IADL). Analyses were stratified by sex. Over 15 years, baseline frailty score was positively associated with disability trajectories in men [βADL = 0.074, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.064; P  = .083; βIADL = 0.094, 95% CI = 0.080; P  = 0.107] and women (βADL = 0.097, 95% CI = 0.089; P  = .105; βIADL = 0.108, 95% CI = 0.097; P  = .118). Frail participants showed higher ADL and IADL disability levels, independent of baseline disability, compared with prefrail and robust participants across all age groups. Overall, participants displayed higher levels of IADL disability than ADL disability. Study findings indicate the importance of early frailty assessment using the SHARE-FI in individuals 50 and older as it provides valuable insight into future disability outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The aims were to study the differences in work-disability in patients with low back pain (LBP) in relation to (i) treatment provided (non-surgical or lumber spine surgery (decompression or fusion), and (ii) two time points, i.e. before and after the social insurance regulation changes in the in 2008. Methods All non-pensioned individuals, aged 19–60 years, living in Sweden, diagnosed with LBP in 2004–06 or 2008–10 were included (n = 153739). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals for long-term sickness absence (>90 days, LTSA) and disability pension (DP) for LBP-patients (non-surgical, decompression, fusion, both surgeries) were estimated by Cox regression compared with the matched references from the general population without LBP (n = 566008). Results LBP-patients had a higher risk of subsequent work-disability compared with the references before and after insurance regulation changes. LBP-patients receiving decompression surgery had similar risk for later work-disability as those treated non-surgically. However, following regulation changes, LBP-patients undergoing fusion surgery had higher risk estimates of both LTSA (HR: 3.3) and DP (HR: 4.8) than patients treated non-surgically (HR: LTSA 2.1; DP 2.5) or with decompression (HR: LTSA 2.6; DP 2.1). In the adjusted models, risk estimates mainly attenuated after controlling for previous sickness absence. Conclusion Risk for subsequent work-disability among LBP-patients was higher compared with people without LBP and lumbar spine surgery. Discrepancies in risk were explained by the treatment provided previous sickness absence and changes in the social insurance regulations, specifically LBP-patients treated with fusion surgery had an increased risk of subsequent work-disability after changes in regulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Providing health care is a balancing act among human resources, financial pressures and system-intrinsic factors. Understanding the utilization behaviour of primary and secondary care facilities [general practitioners (GPs) vs. specialists, as well as in- and outpatient hospital care] is crucial for a country like Austria, which has free access to all levels of care. The aim of this study was to reassess access point consultations in relation to sociodemographic variables over time. The databases used for this cross-sectional analysis were the Austrian Health Interview Surveys 2006/07, 2014, and 2019, with sample sizes of 15 474, 15 770, and 15 461 persons, respectively. Analyses included patterns of utilization behaviour, multivariable logistic regression models, and diff-in-diff analyses highlighting differences between the observation periods. GP and secondary care consultations increased from 2014 to 2019. While there were fewer GP visits in 2014 than in 2006/07, GP consultation rates grew by 3.2% between 2014 and 2019. Secondary care utilization increased by 5.4%-8.2% between 2006/07 and 2019, with the highest growth in older and less-educated persons. Secondary-level utilization without prior GP visits decreased again in 2019 after peaking in 2014. Utilization of all access points increased over the entire observation period, especially regarding secondary-level care. Higher GP visit rates do not seem to result in a drop in secondary-level consultations. These results emphasize the coordinator role of primary care in ongoing structural health reforms in European countries, such as Austria., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.)