Search

Background MRI based radiomics has the potential to better define tumor biology compared to qualitative MRI assessment and support decisions in patients affected by nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Aim of this review was to systematically evaluate the methodological quality of studies using MRI- radiomics for nasopharyngeal cancer patient evaluation. Methods A systematic search was performed in PUBMED, WEB OF SCIENCE and SCOPUS using “MRI, magnetic resonance imaging, radiomic, texture analysis, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, nasopharyngeal cancer” in all possible combinations. The methodological quality of study included ( = 24) was evaluated according to the RQS (Radiomic quality score). Subgroup, for journal type (imaging/clinical) and biomarker (prognostic/predictive), and correlation, between RQS and journal Impact Factor, analyses were performed. Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman’s correlation were performed. P value < .05 were defined as statistically significant. Results Overall, no studies reported a phantom study or a test re-test for assessing stability in image, biological correlation or open science data. Only 8% of them included external validation. Almost half of articles (45%) performed multivariable analysis with non-radiomics features. Only 1 study was prospective (4%). The mean RQS was 7.5 ± 5.4. No significant differences were detected between articles published in clinical/imaging journal and between studies with a predictive or prognostic biomarker. No significant correlation was found between total RQS and Impact Factor of the year of publication (p always > 0.05). Conclusions Radiomic articles in nasopharyngeal cancer are mostly of low methodological quality. The greatest limitations are the lack of external validation, biological correlates, prospective design and open science.

Objective Patients with solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) are usually sent to total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) examination with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). However, a segmental scan strategy may improve cost/effectiveness in this category of patients. Conclusion A segmental PET/CT scan only at the chest level could be performed in patients with indeterminate SPN. Limiting the PET/CT field to the thoracic region would greatly affect on radiobiology, department organization and health-care costs.

to assess the quality of guidelines on clinical indications for the use offrom March to May 2019, the current literature was searched to identify guidelines focused on clinical indications for the use offour guidelines were selected. Of these, one resulted of high quality (mean score 86.5 %), another showed an average quality (mean score 61.8 %), and the remaining two proved to be of low quality (mean scores of 53.3 and 45.7, respectively). With the exception of the high-quality guideline, critical domains were Domain 2 "Stakeholder involvement" (total mean score 56.28 + 15.9), Domain 3 "Rigor of development" (total mean score 43.48 + 27.6), Domain 5 "Applicability" (total mean score 46.90 + 19.4) and Domain 6 "Editorial independence" (total mean score 50.55 + 35.7). ICC values ranged from 0.939 to 0.995, indicating very good agreement among the four appraisers.a heterogeneous quality of guidelines dealing with clinical indications for the use of

Purpose to assess the quality of guidelines on clinical indications for the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in oncology using the AGREE II tool. Method from March to May 2019, the current literature was searched to identify guidelines focused on clinical indications for the use of18F-FDG PET/CT in oncology. The quality of the selected guidelines was then assessed by four independent appraisers using the AGREE II tool, which is organized in six quality domains accounting for a total of 23 items. The agreement among appraisers was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Results four guidelines were selected. Of these, one resulted of high quality (mean score 86.5 %), another showed an average quality (mean score 61.8 %), and the remaining two proved to be of low quality (mean scores of 53.3 and 45.7, respectively). With the exception of the high-quality guideline, critical domains were Domain 2 “Stakeholder involvement” (total mean score 56.28 + 15.9), Domain 3 “Rigor of development” (total mean score 43.48 + 27.6), Domain 5 “Applicability” (total mean score 46.90 + 19.4) and Domain 6 “Editorial independence” (total mean score 50.55 + 35.7). ICC values ranged from 0.939 to 0.995, indicating very good agreement among the four appraisers. Conclusions a heterogeneous quality of guidelines dealing with clinical indications for the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in oncology emerged from our analysis. Further efforts should be made to improve the reporting of the applied methodology as well as to promote the applicability of guidelines into clinical practice.

Patients with solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) are usually sent to total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) examination with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). However, a segmental scan strategy may improve cost/effectiveness in this category of patients.A segmental PET/CT scan only at the chest level could be performed in patients with indeterminate SPN. Limiting the PET/CT field to the thoracic region would greatly affect on radiobiology, department organization and health-care costs.