1. How fast can we scan patients with modern (digital) PET/CT systems?
- Author
-
Lasnon C, Coudrais N, Houdu B, Nganoa C, Salomon T, Enilorac B, and Aide N
- Subjects
- Child, Female, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography statistics & numerical data, Time Factors, Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography methods
- Abstract
Purpose: To seek for the minimal duration per bed position with a digital PET system without compromising image quality and lesion detection in patients requiring fast
18 F-FDG PET imaging., Materials and Methods: 19 cancer patients experiencing pain or dyspnea and 9 pediatric patients were scanned on a Vereos system. List mode data were reconstructed with decreasing time frame down to 10 s per bed position. Noise was evaluated in the liver, blood pool and muscle, and using target-to-background ratios. Five PET readers recorded image quality, number of clinically relevant foci and of involved anatomical sites in reconstructions ranging from 60 to 10 s per bed position, compared to the standard 90 s reconstruction., Results: The following reconstructions, which harboured a noise not significantly higher than that of the standard reconstruction, were selected for clinical evaluation: 1iterations/10 subsets/20sec (1i10 s20sec ), 1i10 s30sec , and 2i10 sPSF60sec. Only the 60 s per bed acquisition displayed similar target-to-background ratios compared to the standard reconstruction, but mean ratios were still higher than 2.0 for the 30 s reconstruction. Inter-rater agreement for the number of involved anatomical sites and detected lesion was good or almost perfect (Kappa: 0.64-0.91) for all acquisitions. In particular, kappa for the 30 s per bed acquisition was 0.78 and 0.91 for lesion and anatomical sites number, respectively. Intra-rater agreement was also excellent for the 30 s reconstruction (kappa = 0.72). Median estimated total PET acquisition time for the 1i10 s30sec , and the standard reconstruction were 4 and 12 min, respectively., Conclusions: Fast imaging is feasible with state-of-the-art PET systems. Acquisitions of 30 s per bed position are feasible with the Vereos system, requiring optimization of reconstruction parameters., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF