Search

Objective: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver using volumetric spin-echo with sampling perfection with application-optimized contrast using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) with conventional turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence for fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver., Materials and Methods: Thirty-three patients with suspected focal liver lesions had SPACE MR imaging and conventional fat-suppressed TSE MR imaging. Images were analyzed quantitatively by measuring the lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of main focal hepatic lesions, hepatic and splenic parenchyma and qualitatively by evaluating the presence of vascular, respiratory motion and cardiac artifacts. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to search for differences between the two sequences., Results: SPACE MR imaging showed significantly greater CNR for focal liver lesions (median=22.82) than TSE MR imaging (median=14.15) (P<.001). No differences were found for SNR of hepatic parenchyma (P=.097), main focal hepatic lesions (P=.35), and splenic parenchyma (P=.25). SPACE sequence showed less artifacts than TSE sequence (vascular, P<.001; respiratory motion, P<.001; cardiac, P<.001) but needed a longer acquisition time (228.4 vs. 162.1s; P<.001)., Conclusion: SPACE MR imaging provides a significantly increased CNR for focal liver lesions and less artifacts by comparison with the conventional TSE sequence. These results should stimulate further clinical studies with a surgical standard of reference to compare the two techniques in terms of sensitivity for malignant lesions., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To test interobserver variability of ADC measurements and compare the diagnostic performances of free-breathing diffusion-weighted (FBDW) with that of T2-weighted FSE (T2WFSE) MR imaging for differentiating between cavernous hemangiomas and untreated malignant hepatic neoplasms., Materials and Methods: Thirty-five patients with cavernous hemangiomas and 35 with untreated hepatic malignant neoplasms had FBDW and T2WFSE MR imaging. Hepatic lesions were characterized with ADC measurement and visual evaluation. Interobserver agreement for ADC measurement was calculated. Association between ADC value and lesion type was assessed using univariate analysis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ADC values and visual evaluation of MR images for the diagnosis of untreated malignant hepatic neoplasm were compared., Results: ADC measurements showed excellent interobserver correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.980). Malignant neoplasms had lower ADC values than hemangiomas for the two observers (1.11×10(-3) mm2/s±.21×10(-3) vs. 1.77×10(-3) mm2/s±.29×10(-3) for observer 1 and 1.11×10(-3) mm2/s±.19×10(-3) vs. 1.79×10(-3) mm2/s±.32×10(-3) for observer 2) and univariate analysis found significant correlations between lesion type and ADC values. Depending on ADC threshold value, accuracy for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm varied from 82.9% to 94.3%. Using visual evaluation, FBDW showed better specificity and accuracy than T2WFSE MR images for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (97.1% vs. 77.1% and 94.3% vs. 62.9%, respectively)., Conclusion: FBDW imaging provides reproducible quantitative information and surpasses the value of T2WFSE MR imaging for differentiating between cavernous hemangiomas and untreated malignant hepatic neoplasms., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the respective sensitivities of diffusion-weighted (DW), T2-weighted fast spin-echo (T2WFSE) and gadolinium chelate-enhanced MR imaging in the preoperative detection of hepatic metastases using intraoperative ultrasonographic and histopathologic findings as the standard of reference., Materials and Methods: Twenty-seven patients with 64 surgically and histopathologically proven hepatic metastases had MR imaging of the liver, including DW, T2WFSE and dynamic gadolinium chelate-enhanced MR imaging. Images from each MR sequence were separately analyzed by two readers with disagreements resolved by consensus readings. The findings on MR images were compared with intraoperative ultrasonographic and histopathologic findings on a lesion-by-lesion basis to determine the sensitivity of each MR sequence. Statistical review of the lesion-by-lesion analysis was performed with the McNemar test., Results: DW, T2WFSE and gadolinium chelate-enhanced MR imaging allowed the depiction of 54/64 (84.4%; 95% CI: 73.1-92.2%), 44/64 (68.8%; 95% CI: 55.9-79.8%), and 51/64 (79.7%; 95% CI: 67.8-88.7%) hepatic metastases respectively. DW MR images allowed depiction of significantly more hepatic metastases than did T2WFSE and was equivalent to gadolinium chelate-enhanced MR imaging (P=.002 and P=.375, respectively)., Conclusion: DW MR imaging is superior to T2WFSE imaging and equivalent to gadolinium chelate-enhanced MR imaging for the preoperative detection of hepatic metastases. Further studies however are needed to determine at what extent DW MR imaging can be used as an alternative to gadolinium chelate-enhanced MR imaging for the preoperative depiction of hepatic metastases., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)