1. Whole-tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from angiomatous meningioma
- Author
-
Wenle He, Jun Zhou, Xiaodan Li, Yikai Xu, Yihao Guo, Xiaomin Liu, Xiang Xiao, Liuji Guo, and Yuankui Wu
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Percentile ,Solitary fibrous tumor ,Infratentorial Neoplasms ,Skull Base Neoplasms ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Diagnosis, Differential ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Histogram ,Meningeal Neoplasms ,Humans ,Medicine ,Effective diffusion coefficient ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Aged ,Hemangiopericytoma ,Receiver operating characteristic ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Solitary Fibrous Tumors ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Mann–Whitney U test ,Kurtosis ,Female ,Epidemiologic Methods ,Meningioma ,business ,Nuclear medicine - Abstract
Purpose To assess the role of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps based on whole-tumor in differentiating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma (SFT/HPC) from angiomatous meningioma (AM). Materials and methods Pathologically confirmed intracranial SFT/HPC (n = 15) and AM (n = 20) were retrospectively collected and their clinical and conventional MRI features were analyzed. Diffusion-weighted (DW) images (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2) were processed with the mono-exponential model. Regions of interest covering the whole tumor were drawn on all slices of the ADC maps to obtain histogram parameters, including mean ADC (ADCmean), median ADC (ADCmedian), maximum ADC (ADCmax), minimum ADC (ADCmin), skewness and kurtosis, as well as the 5th, 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th and 95th percentile ADC (ADC5, ADC10, ADC25, ADC75, ADC90 and ADC95). Differences of histogram parameters between SFT/HPC and AM were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the diagnostic performance. Results The ADCmin (P = 0.001) and ADC5 (P = 0.045) were significantly lower in SFT/HPCs than in AMs, while no significant difference was found in sex, age, conventional MRI features or any other histogram parameters between the two entities (P = 0.051−1.000). ADCmin showed the best diagnostic performance (area under curve [AUC], 0.86; sensitivity, 81.3%; specificity, 83.3%) in differentiating SFT/HPC from AM with optimal cutoff value being 569.00 × 10−6 mm2/s, followed by ADC5 (AUC, 0.72; sensitivity, 68.8%; specificity, 75%) with optimal cutoff value being 781.97 × 10−6 mm2/s. Conclusion SFT/HPC and AM share similar conventional MR appearances. Whole-tumor histogram analysis of ADC maps may be a useful tool for differential diagnosis, with ADCmin and ADC5 being potential parameters.
- Published
- 2019