Search

Objective: To construct a predictive model to discriminate adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) from invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) appearing as pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) using computed tomography (CT) histogram analysis combined with morphological characteristics and to evaluate its diagnostic performance.Materials and Methods: Two hundred eighty-nine patients with surgically resected solitary pGGN and pathologically diagnosed with AIS, MIA, or IAC in our institution from January 2014 to May 2018 were enrolled in our study. Two hundred twenty-six pGGNs (79 AIS, 84 MIA, and 63 IAC) were randomly selected and assigned to a model-development cohort, and the remaining 63 pGGNs (11 AIS, 29 MIA and 23 IAC) were assigned to a validation cohort. The morphological characteristics were established as model A and histogram parameters as model B. The diagnostic performances of model A, model B, and model A + B were evaluated and compared via receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and logistic regression analysis.Results: Entropy (odd ratio [OR] = 23.25, 95%CI: 6.83-79.15, p < 0.001), microvascular sign (OR = 8.62, 95%CI: 3.72-19.98, p < 0.001) and the maximum diameter (OR = 4.37, 95%CI: 2.44-7.84, p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors in the IAC group. The area under the ROC (Az value), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of model A + B were 0.896, 88.1%, 79.4% and 91.4%, respectively, exhibiting a significantly higher Az value than either model A or model B alone (0.785 vs 0.896, p < 0.001; 0.849 vs 0.896, p = 0.029). Model A + B also conveyed a good diagnostic performance in the validation cohort, with an Az value of 0.851.Conclusion: Histogram analysis combined with morphological characteristics exhibit a superior diagnostic performance in discriminating AIS-MIA from IAC appearing as pGGNs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To provide an overview of the available studies investigating the use of computer tomography (CT) radiomics features for differentiating invasive adenocarcinomas (IAC) from indolent lung adenocarcinomas presenting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs), to identify the bias of the studies and to propose directions for future research.Method: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection were searched for relevant studies. The studies differentiating IAC from indolent lung adenocarcinomas appearing as GGNs based on CT radiomics features were included. Basic information, patient information, CT-scanner information, technique information and performance information were extracted for each included study. The quality of each study was assessed using the Radiomic Quality Score (RQS) and the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).Results: Twenty-eight studies were included with patients ranging from 34 to 794. All of them were retrospective. Patients in three studies were from multiple centers. Most studies segmented regions of interest manually. Pyradiomics and AK software were the most frequently used for features extraction. The number of radiomics features extracted varied from 7 to 10329. Logistic regression was the most frequently chosen model. Entropy was identified as radiomics signature in seven studies. The AUC of included studies ranged from 0.77 to 0.98 in 15 validation sets. The percentage RQS ranged from 3% to 50%. According to PROBAST, the overall risk of bias (ROB) was high in 89.3% (25/28) of included studies, unclear in 7.1% (2/28) of included studies, and low in 3.6% (1/28) of included studies. All studies were low concern regarding the applicability of primary studies to the review question.Conclusion: CT radiomics-based model is promising and encouraging in differentiating IAC from indolent lung adenocarcinomas, though they require methodological rigor. Well-designed studies are necessary to demonstrate their validity and standardization of methods and results can prompt their use in daily clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We aimed to investigate the risk factors of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma, especially to report and validate the use of our newly identified arc concave sign in predicting invasiveness of pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs).Methods: From January 2015 to August 2018, we retrospectively enrolled 302 patients with 306 pGGNs ≤ 20 mm pathologically confirmed (141 preinvasive lesions and 165 invasive lesions). Arc concave sign was defined as smooth and sunken part of the edge of the lesion on thin-section computed tomography (TSCT). The degree of arc concave sign was expressed by the arc chord distance to chord length ratio (AC-R); deep arc concave sign was defined as AC-R larger than the optimal cut-off value. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors of invasiveness.Results: Arc concave sign was observed in 65 of 306 pGGNs (21.2 %), and deep arc concave sign (AC-R > 0.25) were more common in invasive lesions (P = 0.008). Under microscope, interlobular septal displacements were found at tumour surface. Multivariate analysis indicated that irregular shape (OR, 3.558; CI: 1.374-9.214), presence of deep arc concave sign (OR, 3.336; CI: 1.013-10.986), the largest diameter > 10.1 mm (OR, 4.607; CI: 2.584-8.212) and maximum density > -502 HU (OR, 6.301; CI: 3.562-11.148) were significant independent risk factors of invasive lesions.Conclusions: Arc concave sign on TSCT is caused by interlobular septal displacement. The degree of arc concave sign can reflect the invasiveness of pGGNs. Invasive lesions can be effectively distinguished from preinvasive lesions by the presence of deep arc concave sign, irregular shape, the largest diameter > 10.1 mm and maximum density > -502 HU in pGGNs ≤ 20 mm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]