Search

Multimodal treatment of patients with advanced pelvic malignancies (APM) is challenging and surgical expertise is usually concentrated in highly specialised centres. Given significant regional variation in APM surgery, surgical training represents a cornerstone in standardising and future-proofing of this complex therapy. The aim of this study was to describe the availability and current satisfaction levels with surgical training for APM.An online questionnaire was developed and distributed through the Redcap© platform with 32 questions addressing participant and institution demographics, and training in APM surgeries. The survey was electronically disseminated in 2021 to surgical networks across Europe including all specialities treating APM via the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO). All statistical analysis were performed using R.The survey received 280 responses from surgeons across 49 countries, representing general surgery (36%), surgical oncology (30%), gynaeoncology (15%), colorectal surgery (14%) and urology (5%). Fifty-three percent of participants report performing25 APM procedures/year. Respondents were departmental chiefs (12%), consultants (34%), specialist surgeons (40%) and fellows (15%). 34% were happy/very happy with their training with 70% satisfaction about their exposure to surgical procedures. Respondents reported a lack of standardised training (72%), monitoring tools (41%) and mentorship (56%). 57% rated attended courses as useful for training, while 80% rated visiting expert centres as useful.This study has identified a learning need for improved structured training in APM, with low current satisfaction levels with exposure to APM training. Organisations such as ESSO provide an important platform for visiting expert centres, courses, and structured training.

Background and objectives The oncological benefit of axillary surgery (AS), with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary dissection (ALND), in elderly women affected by breast cancer (BC) is controversial. We evaluated AS trends over a 10-year follow-up period as well as locoregional and survival outcomes in this subset of patients. Methods Patients aged 70 years or older, treated between 1994 and 2008, were selected and divided in two groups, depending on whether or not AS was performed. A (1:1) matched analysis for all relevant clinicopathological features was performed. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and univariate Cox-proportional hazard ratio analysis. Results A total of 1.748 patients were identified and stratified by age (70–74, 75–79, 80–84). A matched analysis was performed for 252 patients: 122 who underwent AS and 122 who did not. At 10-year follow-up, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, distant metastasis and contralateral BC were similar, p = 0.83, p = 0.42 and p = 0.28, respectively. In the no-AS group, a significant increased risk of axillary lymph-node recurrence was identified at 5- and confirmed at 10-years (p = 0.038), without impact on overall survival at 5- and 10-years (p = 0.52). In the non-AS group, higher rate of axillary recurrence at 10-years was observed in patients with poorly differentiated (24.1%, 95% CI 7.2–46.2), highly proliferative (Ki67 ≥ 20%: 17.1%, 95% CI 0.6–33.3) and luminal B tumors (16.8%, 95% CI 5.9–35.5). Conclusions Axillary staging in elderly women does not impact long-term survival. Tailoring surgery according to tumor biology and age may improve locoregional outcome.