Search

Objectives: To assess the ability of renal blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) MRI metrics to predict post-operative renal function.Methods: We studied 152 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and renal MRI examination including BOLD. Short-term and long-term renal function was evaluated using the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) derived from renal scintigraphy. Renal function decline was assessed as the absolute decline (AD), percentage decline (PD) and optimal renal function preservation (OP). T2* values were analysed in the renal cortex and medulla ipsilateral and contralateral to the tumour. Clinical characteristics and imaging metrics were evaluated using univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses. Risk factors obtained using BOLD metrics (determined by multivariate regression) were then combined and compared with RENAL scores to predict OP.Results: Increasing warm ischaemia time (WIT), resected and ischaemic volume (RAIV), larger tumour size, higher RENAL score and lower preoperative GFR were short-term risk factors for AD, while increasing WIT and lower preoperative GFR were significant for long-term outcomes. Increasing WIT, RAIV, lower T2* value in the cortex and higher T2* value in the medulla on the ipsilateral side were short-term risk factors for PD, while all of the above factors (except WIT and RAIV) were significant for long-term outcomes. The performance of the combination of T2* values in the cortex and medulla on the ipsilateral side to tumour in predicting OP was better than RENAL score (AUC 0.762 vs 0.634, p = 0.013).Conclusions: Renal BOLD-MRI metrics could provide useful information to the clinician in predicting post-operative renal function outcomes.Key Points: • Renal fMRI metrics may be useful for prediction of renal functional outcomes and merit further study. • Renal fMRI metrics may reflect degree of baseline disease and ability to tolerate warm ischaemia. • Combination of T2* values was better than RENAL score for predicting OP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the utility of MR R2*-mapping and the optimal time-point for assessing the response of pulmonary metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) to anti-angiogenic targeted therapy (aATT).Materials and Methods: The exploration-sample group and the validation-sample group consisted of 22 and 16 patients. The parameters of MR R2*-mapping, including the R2* value at each time-point (R2*base, R2*1cyc and R2*2cyc) and change between different time-points (R2*(1cyc-base)/base, R2*(2cyc-base)/base and R2*(2cyc-1cyc)/1cyc), were evaluated with a receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, and a cut-off value derived from the clinical outcome was applied to the Kaplan-Meier method to assess the value of R2* mapping and Response-Evaluation-Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) during treatment evaluation.Results: The inter-, intra-observer agreements and inter-scan consistency were excellent (p > 0.80). For the exploration-sample group, the areas under the curve for the parameters of MR R2* mapping were 0.55, 0.60, 0.83, 0.64, 0.88 and 0.83 for R2*base, R2*1cyc, R2*2cyc, R2*(1cyc-base)/base, R2*(2cyc-base)/base and R2*(2cyc-1cyc)/1cyc. For the validation-sample, R2*(2cyc-base)/base better predicted progression-free survival (p = 0.03) than RECIST and other R2* mapping parameters with a lower p value.Conclusion: Assessing aATT outcome based on changes in the R2* value between baseline and second treatment is more accurate than assessment at other time-points and assessment based on the RECIST.Key Points: • The inter-scan consistency of R2*-mapping in pulmonary mRCC are excellent. • The intra-/inter-observer agreement of R2* mapping in pulmonary mRCC are excellent. • Using changes in R2* value between baseline/after second-treatment is better than RECIST. • The choice of baseline/after second treatment is better than other time-points. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]