Search

Objectives: As a novel follow-up method for intracranial aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coil embolization (SACE), we developed four-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with minimized acoustic noise utilizing ultrashort-echo time (4D mUTE-MRA). We aimed to assess whether 4D mUTE-MRA is useful for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with SACE. Methods: This study included 31 consecutive patients with intracranial aneurysm treated with SACE who underwent 4D mUTE-MRA at 3 T and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). For 4D mUTE-MRA, five dynamic MRA images with a spatial resolution of 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm3 were obtained every 200 ms. Two readers independently reviewed the 4D mUTE-MRA images to evaluate the aneurysm occlusion status (total occlusion, residual neck, and residual aneurysm) and the flow in the stent using a 4-point scale (from 1 [not visible] to 4 [excellent]). The interobserver and intermodality agreement was assessed using κ statistics. Results: On DSA images, 10 aneurysms were classified as total occlusion, 14 as residual neck, and 7 as residual aneurysm. In terms of aneurysm occlusion status, the intermodality and interobserver agreement was excellent (κ = 0.92 and κ = 0.96, respectively). For the flow in the stents on 4D mUTE-MRA, the mean score was significantly higher for single stents than multiple stents (p <.001) and for open-cell type stents than closed-cell type (p <.01). Conclusions: 4D mUTE-MRA is a useful tool with a high spatial and temporal resolution for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with SACE. Key Points: • In the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with SACE on 4D mUTE-MRA and DSA, the intermodality and interobserver agreement in aneurysm occlusion status was excellent. • 4D mUTE-MRA shows good to excellent visualization of flow in the stents, especially for cases treated with a single or open-cell stent. • 4D mUTE-MRA can provide hemodynamic information related to embolized aneurysms and the distal arteries to stented parent arteries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the image quality of deep learning–based reconstruction (DLR), model-based (MBIR), and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithms for lower-dose (LD) unenhanced head CT and compare it with those of standard-dose (STD) HIR images. Methods: This retrospective study included 114 patients who underwent unenhanced head CT using the STD (n = 57) or LD (n = 57) protocol on a 320-row CT. STD images were reconstructed with HIR; LD images were reconstructed with HIR (LD-HIR), MBIR (LD-MBIR), and DLR (LD-DLR). The image noise, gray and white matter (GM-WM) contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the basal ganglia and posterior fossa levels were quantified. The noise magnitude, noise texture, GM-WM contrast, image sharpness, streak artifact, and subjective acceptability were independently scored by three radiologists (1 = worst, 5 = best). The lesion conspicuity of LD-HIR, LD-MBIR, and LD-DLR was ranked through side-by-side assessments (1 = worst, 3 = best). Reconstruction times of three algorithms were measured. Results: The effective dose of LD was 25% lower than that of STD. Lower image noise, higher GM-WM contrast, and higher CNR were observed in LD-DLR and LD-MBIR than those in STD (all, p ≤ 0.035). Compared with STD, the noise texture, image sharpness, and subjective acceptability were inferior for LD-MBIR and superior for LD-DLR (all, p < 0.001). The lesion conspicuity of LD-DLR (2.9 ± 0.2) was higher than that of HIR (1.2 ± 0.3) and MBIR (1.8 ± 0.4) (all, p < 0.001). Reconstruction times of HIR, MBIR, and DLR were 11 ± 1, 319 ± 17, and 24 ± 1 s, respectively. Conclusion: DLR can enhance the image quality of head CT while preserving low radiation dose level and short reconstruction time. Key Points: • For unenhanced head CT, DLR reduced the image noise and improved the GM-WM contrast and lesion delineation without sacrificing the natural noise texture and image sharpness relative to HIR. • The subjective and objective image quality of DLR was better than that of HIR even at 25% reduced dose without considerably increasing the image reconstruction times (24 s vs. 11 s). • Despite the strong noise reduction and improved GM-WM contrast performance, MBIR degraded the noise texture, sharpness, and subjective acceptance with prolonged reconstruction times relative to HIR, potentially hampering its feasibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a combined wavelet and deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) method for under-sampled pituitary MRI. Methods: This retrospective study included 28 consecutive patients who underwent under-sampled pituitary T2-weighted images (T2WI). Images were reconstructed using either the conventional wavelet denoising method (wavelet method) or the wavelet and DLR methods combined (hybrid DLR method) at five denoising levels. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the CSF, hypothalamic, and pituitary images and the contrast between structures were compared between the two image types. Noise quality, contrast, sharpness, artifacts, and overall image quality were evaluated by two board-certified radiologists. The quantitative and the qualitative analyses were performed with robust two-way repeated analyses of variance. Results: Using the hybrid DLR method, the SNR of the CSF progressively increased as denoising levels increased. By contrast, with the wavelet method, the SNR of the CSF, hypothalamus, and pituitary did not increase at higher denoising levels. There was a significant main effect of denoising methods (p < 0.001) and denoising levels (p < 0.001), and an interaction between denoising methods and denoising levels (p < 0.001). For all five qualitative scores, there was a significant main effect of denoising methods (p < 0.001) and an interaction between denoising methods and denoising levels (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The hybrid DLR method can provide higher image quality for T2WI of the pituitary with compressed sensing (CS) than the wavelet method alone, especially at higher denoising levels. Key Points: •The signal-to-noise ratios of cerebrospinal fluid progressively increased with the hybrid DLR method, with an increase in the denoising level for cerebrospinal fluid in pituitary T2WI with CS. •The signal-to-noise ratios of cerebrospinal fluid using the conventional wavelet method did not increase at higher denoising levels. •All qualitative scores of hybrid deep-learning reconstructions at all denoising levels were higher than those for the wavelet denoising method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]