Search

Objectives: Evaluate the influence of an MRI contrast agent application on primary and follow-up staging in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma using [18F]FDG PET/MRI to avoid adverse effects and save time and costs during examination. Methods: A total of 105 [18F]FDG PET/MRI datasets were included for data evaluation. Two different reading protocols were analyzed by two experienced readers in consensus, including for PET/MRI-1 reading protocol unenhanced T2w and/or T1w imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and [18F]FDG PET imaging and for PET/MRI-2 reading protocol an additional T1w post contrast imaging. Patient-based and region-based evaluation according to the revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Staging System (IPNHLSS) was performed, and a modified standard of reference was applied comprising histopathology and previous and follow-up cross-sectional imaging. Differences in staging accuracy were assessed using the Wilcoxon and McNemar tests. Results: In patient-based analysis, PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 both determined a correct IPNHLSS tumor stage in 90/105 (86%) exams. Region-based analysis correctly identified 119/127 (94%) lymphoma-affected regions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 were 94%, 97%, 90%, 99%, 97%, respectively. There were no significant differences between PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2. Conclusions: The use of MRI contrast agents in [18F]FDG PET/MRI examinations has no beneficial effect in primary and follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients. Therefore, switching to a contrast agent–free [18F]FDG PET/MRI protocol should be considered in all pediatric lymphoma patients. Clinical relevance statement: This study gives a scientific baseline switching to a contrast agent–free [18F]FDG PET/MRI staging in pediatric lymphoma patients. This could avoid side effects of contrast agents and saves time and costs by a faster staging protocol for pediatric patients. Key Points: • No additional diagnostic benefit of MRI contrast agents at [18F]FDG PET/MRI examinations of pediatric lymphoma primary and follow-up staging • Highly accurate primary and follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients at MRI contrast–free [18F]FDG PET/MRI [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]