Search

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of dual-time-point imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) using O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) for non-invasive grading of cerebral gliomas compared with a dynamic approach.Thirty-six patients with histologically confirmed cerebral gliomas (21 primary, 15 recurrent; 24 high-grade, 12 low-grade) underwent dynamic PET from 0 to 50 min post-injection (p.i.) of (18)F-FET, and additionally from 70 to 90 min p.i. Mean tumour-to-brain ratios (TBRmean) of (18)F-FET uptake were determined in early (20-40 min p.i.) and late (70-90 min p.i.) examinations. Time-activity curves (TAC) of the tumours from 0 to 50 min after injection were assigned to different patterns. The diagnostic accuracy of changes of (18)F-FET uptake between early and late examinations for tumour grading was compared to that of curve pattern analysis from 0 to 50 min p.i. of (18)F-FET.The diagnostic accuracy of changes of the TBRmean of (18)F-FET PET uptake between early and late examinations for the identification of HGG was 81% (sensitivity 83%; specificity 75%; cutoff - 8%; p 0.001), and 83% for curve pattern analysis (sensitivity 88%; specificity 75%; p 0.001).Dual-time-point imaging of (18)F-FET uptake in gliomas achieves diagnostic accuracy for tumour grading that is similar to the more time-consuming dynamic data acquisition protocol.• Dual-time-point imaging is equivalent to dynamic FET PET for grading of gliomas. • Dual-time-point imaging is less time consuming than dynamic FET PET. • Costs can be reduced due to higher patient throughput. • Reduced imaging time increases patient comfort and sedation might be avoided. • Quicker image interpretation is possible, as no curve evaluation is necessary.