Search

Objectives: To identify the feasibility of deep learning–based diagnostic models for detecting and assessing lower-extremity fatigue fracture severity on plain radiographs. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 1151 X-ray images (tibiofibula/foot: 682/469) of fatigue fractures and 2842 X-ray images (tibiofibula/foot: 2000/842) without abnormal presentations from two clinical centers. After labeling the lesions, images in a center (tibiofibula/foot: 2539/1180) were allocated at 7:1:2 for model construction, and the remaining images from another center (tibiofibula/foot: 143/131) for external validation. A ResNet-50 and a triplet branch network were adopted to construct diagnostic models for detecting and grading. The performances of detection models were evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), while grading models were evaluated with accuracy by confusion matrix. Visual estimations by radiologists were performed for comparisons with models. Results: For the detection model on tibiofibula, a sensitivity of 95.4%/85.5%, a specificity of 80.1%/77.0%, and an AUC of 0.965/0.877 were achieved in the internal testing/external validation set. The detection model on foot reached a sensitivity of 96.4%/90.8%, a specificity of 76.0%/66.7%, and an AUC of 0.947/0.911. The detection models showed superior performance to the junior radiologist, comparable to the intermediate or senior radiologist. The overall accuracy of the diagnostic model was 78.5%/62.9% for tibiofibula and 74.7%/61.1% for foot in the internal testing/external validation set. Conclusions: The deep learning–based models could be applied to the radiological diagnosis of plain radiographs for assisting in the detection and grading of fatigue fractures on tibiofibula and foot. Key Points: • Fatigue fractures on radiographs are relatively difficult to detect, and apt to be misdiagnosed. • Detection and grading models based on deep learning were constructed on a large cohort of radiographs with lower-extremity fatigue fractures. • The detection model with high sensitivity would help to reduce the misdiagnosis of lower-extremity fatigue fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The molecular subtyping of diffuse gliomas is important. The aim of this study was to establish predictive models based on preoperative multiparametric MRI. Methods: A total of 1016 diffuse glioma patients were retrospectively collected from Beijing Tiantan Hospital. Patients were randomly divided into the training (n = 780) and validation (n = 236) sets. According to the 2016 WHO classification, diffuse gliomas can be classified into four binary classification tasks (tasks I–IV). Predictive models based on radiomics and deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) were developed respectively, and their performances were compared with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Additionally, the radiomics and DCNN features were visualized and compared with the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding technique and Spearman's correlation test. Results: In the training set, areas under the curves (AUCs) of the DCNN models (ranging from 0.99 to 1.00) outperformed the radiomics models in all tasks, and the accuracies of the DCNN models (ranging from 0.90 to 0.94) outperformed the radiomics models in tasks I, II, and III. In the independent validation set, the accuracies of the DCNN models outperformed the radiomics models in all tasks (0.74–0.83), and the AUCs of the DCNN models (0.85–0.89) outperformed the radiomics models in tasks I, II, and III. DCNN features demonstrated more superior discriminative capability than the radiomics features in feature visualization analysis, and their general correlations were weak. Conclusions: Both the radiomics and DCNN models could preoperatively predict the molecular subtypes of diffuse gliomas, and the latter performed better in most circumstances. Key Points: • The molecular subtypes of diffuse gliomas could be predicted with MRI. • Deep learning features tend to outperform radiomics features in large cohorts. • The correlation between the radiomics features and DCNN features was low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]