Search

Two methods to measure sagittal plane segmental motion in the cervical spine are compared. Translational and rotational motion was measured in nine cervical motion segments of nine patients by distortion-compensated (DCRA) as well as by stereophotogrammetric Roentgen analysis (RSA). To compare measurement precision of the new DCRA protocol with the established RSA technique under realistic clinical conditions and to discuss advantages and disadvantages of both methods in clinical studies. RSA constitutes the most precise method available to assess segmental motion or to monitor fusion in the cervical spine. Due to the invasive nature of the procedure there is an interest in alternative, non-invasive protocols, based on conventional, lateral radiographic views. In nine patients, segmental motion of nine cervical segments with spinal surgery and fusion had previously been assessed from stereo views by RSA. From the archive radiographs, sagittal plane segmental motion was re-assessed by DCRA. Results for sagittal plane translational and rotational motion obtained by both methods are compared. With respect to RSA, sagittal plane rotation was determined by DCRA with an error of 2.4 degrees and a mean difference not significantly different from zero. Sagittal plane translation was determined by DCRA with an error of less than 0.78 mm and a mean difference not significantly different from zero. As two methods are compared, these errors represent the combined (propagated) errors of RSA and DCRA. Averaged over the cohort investigated, measurement of sagittal plane segmental motion exhibited no significant difference between DCRA and RSA.

Purpose Cervical disc prostheses induce significant amount of artifact in magnetic resonance imaging which may complicate radiologic follow-up after surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate as to what extent the artifact, induced by the frequently used Discover® cervical disc prosthesis, impedes interpretation of the MR images at operated and adjacent levels in 1.5 and 3 Tesla MR. Methods Ten subsequent patients were investigated in both 1.5 and 3 Tesla MR with standard image sequences one year following anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty. Outcome measures Two neuroradiologists evaluated the images by consensus. Emphasis was made on signal changes in medulla at all levels and visualization of root canals at operated and adjacent levels. A “blur artifact ratio” was calculated and defined as the height of the artifact on T1 sagittal images related to the operated level. Results The artifacts induced in 1.5 and 3 Tesla MR were of entirely different character and evaluation of the spinal cord at operated level was impossible in both magnets. Artifacts also made the root canals difficult to assess at operated level and more pronounced in the 3 Tesla MR. At the adjacent levels however, the spinal cord and root canals were completely visualized in all patients. The “blur artifact” induced at operated level was also more pronounced in the 3 Tesla MR. Conclusions The artifact induced by the Discover® titanium disc prosthesis in both 1.5 and 3 Tesla MR, makes interpretation of the spinal cord impossible and visualization of the root canals difficult at operated level. Adjusting the MR sequences to produce the least amount of artifact is important. © The Author(s) 2013 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.