Search

This paper reviews recent studies on the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. The review has been focused on high impact recent articles that have analyzed and/or modified PSO algorithms. This paper also presents some potential areas for future study.

During the last five years, several methods have been proposed for handling nonlinear constraints using evolutionary algorithms (EAs) for numerical optimization problems. Recent survey papers classify these methods into four categories: preservation of feasibility, penalty functions, searching for feasibility, and other hybrids. In this paper we investigate a new approach for solving constrained numerical optimization problems which incorporates a homomorphous mapping between n-dimensional cube and a feasible search space. This approach constitutes an example of the fifth decoder-based category of constraint handling techniques. We demonstrate the power of this new approach on several test cases and discuss its further potential.

This paper proposes a (μ + λ)-differential evolution and an improved adaptive trade-off model for solving constrained optimization problems. The proposed (μ + λ)-differential evolution adopts three mutation strategies (i.e., rand/1 strategy, current-to-best/1 strategy, and rand/2 strategy) and binomial crossover to generate the offspring population. Moreover, the current-to-best/1 strategy has been improved in this paper to further enhance the global exploration ability by exploiting the feasibility proportion of the last population. Additionally, the improved adaptive trade-off model includes three main situations: the infeasible situation, the semi-feasible situation, and the feasible situation. In each situation, a constraint-handling mechanism is designed based on the characteristics of the current population. By combining the (μ + λ)-differential evolution with the improved adaptive trade-off model, a generic method named (μ + λ)-constrained differential evolution ((μ + λ)-CDE) is developed. The (μ + λ)-CDE is utilized to solve 24 well-known benchmark test functions provided for the special session on constrained real-parameter optimization of the 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC2006). Experimental results suggest that the (μ + λ)-CDE is very promising for constrained optimization, since it can reach the best known solutions for 23 test functions and is able to successfully solve 21 test functions in all runs. Moreover, in this paper, a self-adaptive version of (μ + λ)-CDE is proposed which is the most competitive algorithm so far among the CEC2006 entries.

This paper investigates constraint-handling techniques used in nonelitist single-parent evolution strategies for the problem of maximizing a linear function with a single linear constraint. Two repair mechanisms are considered, and the analytical results are compared to those of earlier repair approaches in the same fitness environment. The first algorithm variant applies reflection to initially infeasible candidate solutions, and the second repair method uses truncation to generate feasible solutions from infeasible ones. The distributions describing the strategies’ one-generation behavior are calculated and used in a zeroth-order model for the steady state attained when operating with fixed step size. Considering cumulative step size adaptation, the qualitative differences in the behavior of the algorithm variants can be explained. The approach extends the theoretical knowledge of constraint-handling methods in the field of evolutionary computation and has implications for the design of constraint-handling techniques in connection with cumulative step size adaptation.

We consider optimization problems where the set of solutions available for evaluation at any given time t during optimization is some subset of the feasible space. This model is appropriate to describe many closed-loop optimization settings (i.e., where physical processes or experiments are used to evaluate solutions) where, due to resource limitations, it may be impossible to evaluate particular solutions at particular times (despite the solutions being part of the feasible space). We call the constraints determining which solutions are non-evaluable ephemeral resource constraints (ERCs). In this paper, we investigate two specific types of ERC: one encodes periodic resource availabilities, the other models commitment constraints that make the evaluable part of the space a function of earlier evaluations conducted. In an experimental study, both types of constraint are seen to impact the performance of an evolutionary algorithm significantly. To deal with the effects of the ERCs, we propose and test five different constraint-handling policies (adapted from those used to handle standard constraints), using a number of different test functions including a fitness landscape from a real closed-loop problem. We show that knowing information about the type of resource constraint in advance may be sufficient to select an effective policy for dealing with it, even when advance knowledge of the fitness landscape is limited.