Search

In the present work, we characterize electrophysiologically a commissural subcortical pathway which is related to binocular interactions in the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) of the opossum. The main role played by the circuit comprising this pathway seems to be in relaying information coming from the ipsilateral eye to the NOT. The strongest evidence comes from experiments in which lidocaine was injected into the NOT and the ensuing effects in the opposite nucleus were monitored under ipsilateral monocular stimulation. It was consistently observed that during action of lidocaine the directional response normally elicited by stimulation of the ipsilateral eye did not take place in the NOT opposite to the silenced nucleus. This effect was reverted in a few minutes after recovery of the injected NOT. The response to stimulation of the contralateral eye, though, was not affected by this procedure.

Recordings from direction-selective neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) of the marsupial wallaby, Macropus eugenii, show that 53% of cells are sensitive to visual stimulation of both eyes. Anatomical tracing studies using horseradish peroxidase reveal many retinal terminals in the contralateral NOT but very few in the ipsilateral nucleus. There was no convincing evidence of cortical inputs to the ipsilateral NOT despite large injections of tracer into the visual cortex. During visual stimulation in the visual field of the contralateral eye with moving patterns, the excitatory responses in the NOT generated by ipsiversive motion (right-to-left when recording from the left NOT) were usually larger than the inhibitory responses produced by contraversive motion. Conversely, during ipsilateral eye stimulation, the negative motion components to contraversive motion were usually larger than the positive components to ipsiversive motion. This response pattern resembles that observed in the NOT of the American opossum, Didelphis aurita, where binocularity appears to arise through a commissural subcortical pathway that connects the two nuclei and inverts the directional tuning of the transmitted signals. We propose that the lack of significant input from the ipsilateral eye and cortex in the wallaby suggests that binocularity must arise from another pathway, possibly a commissural route between the nuclei. As directional information appears not to be carried by the internucleus pathway in rats and cats, our results suggest that binocularity in the NOT arises from different sources in marsupials as compared to eutherians.

Binocular visual responses can be recorded in two regions of the superficial layers of the superior colliculus of the opossum. The direct binocular region (DBR) represents the binocular portion of the contralateral hemifield whereas the rostral pole (RP) represents the binocular portion of the ipsilateral hemifield. In the present study single units from both of these regions were tested with binocular and monocular stimulation. Most cells in both regions showed response facilitation when both eyes were simultaneously stimulated and, when tested with different binocular disparities, most cells showed broadly-tuned disparity selectivity. DBR units usually preferred disparities near zero whereas RP units had a wider range of preferred disparities, with a tendency toward positive (crossed) values. This data indicates that the superior colliculus of the opossum could provide a neural substrate for a coarse analysis of depth and also might help control vergence eye movements. The different ranges of disparity selectivity of DBR and RP are consistent with the previously reported monocular receptive-field data and suggest that DBR and RP analyze different depths of the 3-dimensional visual scene.

The representation of the visual field in the upper layers of the opossum's superior colliculus was studied by recording the response of multi-units to visual stimulation. Overall, the visual topography is similar to that of other non-primate mammals. Along the horizontal meridian and magnification factor decreases assymetrically about the vertical meridian, falling more abruptly in the region of the representation of the ipsilateral hemifield. The colliculus may be divided into three parts on the basis of the projections from the retina: a rostral region that does not receive any ipsilateral retinal afferents, a region that receives binocular retinal projections and a monocular region that receives only contralateral retinal input. Electrophysiological recording revealed that the rostral region contains a representation of 40 degrees of the ipsilateral field. The representation of the vertical meridian forms the border between the rostral region and the binocular region and the representation of the 40-45 degrees longitude meridian forms the border between the binocular and monocular regions.

The size, shape and laminar position of efferent neurons in the parietal cortex of the Virginia opossum were identified using the method of retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Injection of HRP into the spinal cord, dorsal column nuclei or pontine nuclei leads to labeling of cells in layer V and occasionally in layer VI, while a large injection of HRP in the dorsal thalamus labels many cells in layer VI, with fewer cells in layer V. HRP injections in the SSM cortex label cells in layers II-VI of ipsilateral and contralateral cortical areas. However, the majority of these cortico-cortical cells are found in the supragranular layers. Examination of the size, shape and laminar position of retrogradely labeled layer V neurons after injections in each of these areas suggests that none of these features can be used to predict accurately the projection target of individual neurons. We conclude that the laminar organization of efferent cells of the opossum parietal cortex is very similar to that seen in the neocortex of other mammals, despite the complete coalescence of somatic sensory (SI) and motor (MI) areas in the opossum.

Although degeneration techniques suggest that cerebello-olivary fibers are limited in their origin and distribution, horseradish peroxidase and autoradiographic experiments make it clear that they arise within all cerebellar nuclei and project to most, if not all, areas of the contralateral inferior olive. Autoradiographic preparations show that cerebello-olivary fibers are highly ordered and suggest that the dentate nucleus projects primarily to the principal olive, the interpositus anterior relays particularly heavy to the dorsal accessory nucleus and the interpositus posterior distributes extensively to the medial accessory complex. Evidence for a small projection from the fastigial nucleus to the caudal medial accessory nucleus is also available. However, it appears clear that neither the dentate nor the interpositus nuclei project to just one subdivision of the olive. For example, although dentate fibers end extensively within the principal nucleus some of them also distribute to portions of the medial accessory nucleus and perhaps the dorsal accessory nucleus as well. The medial accessory olive is particularly complex and at rostral levels receives input from both interposed and dentate nuclei, whereas more caudally it receives a projection from the fastigial nucleus. Olivary fibers from both the interposed and dentate nuclei traverse the brachium conjunctivum descendons and distribute primarily to the rostral 2/3 to 3/4 of the olive, whereas those from fastigial neurons take a different route and end more caudally. Experiments utilizing horseradish peroxidase as a retrograde tracer suggest that cerebello-olivary fibers from both the interpositus anterior and dentate nuclei take origin from a population of generally small neurons.

Visual receptive fields of single units in the superior colliculus of the opossums were analysed in regions representing the ipsilateral (rostral pole - RP) and the contralateral hemifields (direct binocular region - DBR) close to and including the representation of the horizontal meridian. Of 242 units half had receptive field centres of the contralateral eye at the ipsilateral hemifield and the other half at the contralateral hemifield. The proportion of units driven by the ipsilateral eye was considerably smaller at the RP than at the DBR and the frequency of unit response to this eye diminished within the ipsilateral hemifield with progressively more rostral penetrations in the RP. The midline was unequally represented by the two eyes in RP units: while 24 out of 26 receptive fields of the ipsilateral eye straddled the vertical meridian, only 50 out of 120 of the contralateral eye did so. Furthermore, at the RP receptive fields of units responsive to the contralateral eye extended up to 46.8 degrees into the ipsilateral visual field while those mapped for the ipsilateral eye extended only up to 26 degrees. As a result of this tendency for the receptive fields of the ipsilateral, but not the contralateral eye, to overlap the vertical meridian, progressively more rostral recordings yielded an increase in the binocular convergent disparity as a function of the eccentricity for the receptive field of the contralateral eye. Since the disparity didn't vary with the eccentricity in the DBR units, we suggest that stimuli at the midline and close to the animal might be the natural ones to drive large disparity units present in the RP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reference axes for the visuotopic study of the opossum's striate cortex were estimated from corresponding binocular response fields using multi-unit recording. These central binocular axes (CBA) were derived from experimental data based on the concept that corresponding receptive fields for each eye should be mostly in register under natural conditions. Vertical reference meridians, orthogonal to these axes, define a contralateral and an ipsilateral field for each eye with respect to the recording site. An ipsilateral field representation was observed for both eyes in the striate cortex at the transition zone with peristriate. Maximal values for the center and border of ipsilateral receptive fields were, respectively, 8 and 20 degrees for the contralateral eye and 6 and 14 degrees for the ipsilateral eye. An equivalent ipsilateral field representation was found in animals that had the anterior commissure cut prior to the recording session. This suggests that the ipsilateral field of both eyes may be represented in the striate cortex via the ipsilateral optic tract. Additionally, it was observed that the region of higher ganglion cell density in the retina shows a flattened distribution and that the CBA intersects the retina at the temporal aspect of this region.

The uniocular visual field representations on the superior colliculus (SC), as estimated from multiunit response field centres about the horizontal meridian, were compared in midpontine pretrigeminal opossums (Didelphis marsupialis aurita Wied 1826). Recordings from the rostral pole (RP) and its caudal neighbour, the direct binocular region (DBR), as defined by Rocha-Miranda et al. (1978), were distinguished by the histological control. The results showed that while the hemifield contralateral to the recording site was well represented on the DBR by both eyes, the ipsilateral hemifield was generously represented at the RP only by the contralateral eye. At the RP the ipsilateral eye usually conveyed information about the vertical meridian, bringing about an expanded representation of the central visual space. Distinct patterns of representation were also recognized on graphs which relate recording sites along the AP axis of the SC with the azimuths of response field centres. The representation of the vertical reference meridian upon this axis on an oculocentric system was estimated from the DBR data and localized in the RP, at about 500 μm from the rostral end, for the ipsilateral eye (Vo') and in the DBR, at about 800 μm for the other eye (Vo). Similarly, plots of the magnification factor against the AP collicular axis indicated different strategies of representation for each eye. At the segment between 500 and 800 μm on this axis the magnification factors of the ipsilateral eye were usually much higher than those of the other eye. Furthermore, horizontal disparities between field centres were shown to have distinct distributions along the AP axis within the RP and DBR regions. At the latter a constant crossed disparity value (median=5.3°) was present along the AP axis while at the former greater variability and higher central disparity values were detected. An argument is developed based on this data to suggest that under our conditions the central binocular axis of the opossum are convergent with respect to the visual axis and their representation centred about the RP/DBR boundary. The different strategy of representation adopted by each eye at these two regions argue against a redundancy in the processing of visual information at the RP and the DBR on the opposite side, both of which bear a representation of the same visual space when considering only the information conveyed by the eye contralateral to the RP. The possible roles of this organization and the relevancy of these findings for studies of plastic rearrangement are discussed.

A study of efferent fiber connections of the habenula and the inter-peduncular nucleus was conducted using anterograde degeneration techniques. Lesions were placed in the habenula of the opossum and the habenula and interpeduncular nucleus of the cat. Degeneration was studied by means of the Nauta and Fink-Heimer techniques. Fibers from the habenular nucleus of the opossum extended caudally and were traced bilaterally to the interpeduncular nucleus, dorsal tegmental nucleus of Gudden, deep (ventral) tegmental nucleus of Gudden, nucleus centralis superior and nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis. Rostrally fibers were traced to the preoptic and septal region and the anterior and lateral hypothalamus. The medial and lateral habenular nuclei of the cat projected differentially to portions of the interpeduncular nucleus and the tegmental nuclei of Gudden. The medial habenular nucleus sent fibers to the paramedian subnucleus of the interpeduncular nucleus and to the deep tegmental nucleus; whereas the lateral habenular nucleus distributed to the apical and central subnuclei of the interpeduncular nucleus and the dorsal tegmental nucleus. Fibers from both the medial and lateral habenular nuclei were found to project bilaterally to the nucleus paraventricularis anterior, nucleus ventralis anterior, anterior medialis and anterior dorsalis of the thalamus, and the septal area. Fibers from the interpeduncular nucleus of the cat were represented bilaterally. Those passing rostral went to the lateral habenular nucleus, nucleus centromedianus and parafascicularis of the thalamus, and to the septal area. Those directed caudally projected to the nucleus centralis superior, and the dorsal and deep tegmental nucleus of Gudden.