Search

The modulation of perturbation-evoked potential (PEP) N1 as a function of different biomechanical characteristics of perturbation has been investigated before. However, it remains unknown whether the PEP N1 modulation contributes to the shaping of the functional postural response. To improve this understanding, we examined the modulation of functional postural response in relation to the PEP N1 response in ten healthy young subjects during unpredictable perturbations to their upright stance-translations of the support surface in a forward or backward direction at two different amplitudes of constant speed. Using independent components from the fronto-central region, obtained from subject-specific head models created from the MRI, our results show that the latency of onset of the functional postural response after the PEP N1 response was faster for forward than backward perturbations at a constant speed but was not affected by the speed of perturbation. Further, our results reinforce some of the previous findings that suggested that the N1 peak amplitude and peak latency are both modulated by the speed of perturbation but not by the direction of the perturbation. Our results improve the understanding of the relation between characteristics of perturbation and the neurophysiology of reactive balance control and may have implications for the design of brain-machine interfaces for populations with a higher risk of falls.

Transferring information about object weight between hands for use in scaling prehension forces likely depends on the integrity of the structures linking the two sides of the brain. It is unknown whether healthy older adults, who demonstrate a modest decline in this connectivity, transfer fingertip force scaling for object weight between hands. In the present study, healthy older and young adults performed two tasks: gripping and lifting an object, and a ballistic finger abduction movement. For the grip and lift task, participants practiced lifting a novel object using a precision pinch grip with the right hand (RH) and then did so again with the left hand (LH). For the ballistic task, participants were trained to maximally accelerate the right index finger by abducting it. On the grip and lift task, all participants appeared to overestimate the object weight during the 1st RH lift, followed by a progressive reduction on successive lifts. This adaptation was transferred to the LH in both groups on their first lift and remained stable over subsequent lifts. In contrast, the training-induced peak abduction acceleration on the ballistic task transferred poorly to the LH in older with considerably better transfer in young adults. We conclude that the memory representations scaling the lift force for the grip and lift task generalized to the untrained hand, while the greater acceleration that was acquired during practice of the ballistic task showed an incomplete transfer to the opposite hand. These differences may indicate task-dependent interhemispheric transfer of learning in old age.