Search

As a result of longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA), longer wavelengths are blurred when shorter wavelengths are in focus, and vice versa. As a result, LCA affects the color and temporal aspects of the retinal image with hyperopic defocus. In this experiment, we investigated how the sensitivity to temporal color contrast affects emmetropization. Ten-day-old chicks were exposed for three days to sinusoidal color modulation. The modulation was either blue/yellow flicker (BY) (n = 57) or red/green flicker (RG) (n = 60) simulating hyperopic defocus with and without a blue light component. The color contrasts tested were 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 Michelson contrast. The mean illuminance of all stimuli was 680 lux. Temporal modulation was either of a high (10 Hz) or low (0.2 Hz) temporal frequency. To test the role of short- and double-cone stimulation, an additional condition silenced these cones in RG_0.4 (D-) and was compared with RG_0.4 (D+) (n = 14). Changes in ocular components and refractive error were measured using Lenstar and a photorefractometer. With high temporal frequency BY representing an in-focus condition for shorter-wavelengths, we found that high temporal frequency BY contrast was positively correlated with vitreous expansion (R2 = 0.87, p

Chicks respond to two signals from longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA): a wavelength defocus signal and a chromatic signal. Wavelength defocus predicts reduced axial eye growth in monochromatic short-wavelength light, compared to monochromatic long-wavelength light. Wavelength defocus may also influence growth in broadband light. In contrast, a chromatic signal predicts increased growth when short-wavelength contrast > long-wavelength contrast, but only when light is broadband. We aimed to investigate the influence of blue light, temporal frequency and contrast on these signals under broadband conditions. Starting at 12 to 13 days-old, 587 chicks were exposed to the experimental illumination conditions for three days for 8h/day and spent the remainder of their day in the dark. The stimuli were flickering lights, with a temporal frequency of 0.2 or 10 Hz, low (30%) or high contrast (80%), and a variety of ratios of cone contrast simulating the effects of defocus with LCA. There were two color conditions, with blue contrast (bPlus) and without (bMinus). Stimuli in the “bPlus” condition varied the amounts of long- (L-), middle- (M-) and double- (D-) cone contrast, relative to short- (S-) and ultraviolet (UV-) cone contrast, to simulate defocus. Stimuli in the “bMinus” condition only varied the relative modulations of the L+D vs. M cones. In all cases, the average of the stimuli was white, with an illuminance of 777 lux, with cone contrast created through temporal modulation. A Lenstar LS 900 and a Hartinger refractometer were used to measure ocular components and refraction. Wavelength defocus signals with relatively high S-cone contrast resulted in reduced axial growth, and more hyperopic refractions, under low-frequency conditions (p = 0.002), in response to the myopic defocus of blue light. Chromatic signals with relatively high S-cone contrast resulted in increased axial growth and more myopic refractions, under high frequency, low contrast, conditions (p < 0.001). We conclude that the chromatic signals from LCA are dependent on the temporal frequency, phase, and relative contrast of S-cone temporal modulation, and recommend broadband spectral and temporal environments, such as the outdoor environment, to optimize the signals-for-defocus in chick.

In broadband light, longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) provides emmetropization signals from both wavelength defocus and the resulting chromatic cues. Indoor illuminants vary in their spectral output, potentially limiting the signals from LCA. Our aim is to investigate the effect that artificial illuminants with different spectral outputs have on chick emmetropization with and without low temporal frequency modulation. In Experiment 1, two-week-old chicks were exposed to 0.2 Hz, square-wave luminance modulation for 3 days. There were 4 spectral conditions: LED strips that simulated General Electric (GE) LED "Soft" (n = 13), GE LED "Daylight" (n = 12), a novel "Equal" condition (n = 12), and a novel "High S" condition (n = 10). These conditions were all tested at a mean level of 985 lux. In Experiment 2, the effect of intensity on the "Equal" condition was tested at two other light levels (70 lux: n = 10; 680 lux: n = 7). In Experiment 3, the effect of temporal modulation on the "Equal" condition was tested by comparing the 0.2 Hz condition with 0 Hz (steady). Significant differences were found in axial growth across lighting conditions. At 985 lux, birds exposed to the "Equal" condition showed a greater reduction in axial growth (both p 0.01) and a greater hyperopic shift compared to "Soft" and "Daylight" (both p 0.01). The "High S" birds experienced more axial growth compared to "Equal" (p 0.01) but less than in "Soft" and "Daylight" (p 0.01). Axial changes in "Equal" were only observed at 985 lux with 0.2 Hz temporal modulation, and not with lower light levels or steady light. We conclude that axial growth and refraction were dependent on the lighting condition in a manner predicted by wavelength defocus signals arising from LCA.