Search

Current treatment for corneal endothelial dysfunction consists in the replacement of corneal endothelium by keratoplasty. Owing to the scarcity of donor corneas and the increasing number of transplants, alternative treatments such as cell-based therapies are necessary. In this article, we highlight the biological aspects of the cornea and the corneal endothelium, as well as the context that surrounds the need for new alternatives to conventional keratoplasty. We then review some of those experimental treatments in more detail, focusing on the development of the in vitro and preclinical phases of two cell-based therapies: tissue-engineered endothelial keratoplasty (TE-EK) and cell injection. In the case of TE-EK graft construction, we analyse the current progress, considering all the requirements it must meet in order to be functional. Moreover, we discuss the inherent drawbacks of endothelial keratoplasties, which TE-EK grafts should overcome in order to make surgical intervention easier and to improve the outcomes of current endothelial keratoplasties. Finally, we analyse the development of preclinical trials and their limitations in terms of performing an optimal functional evaluation of cell-based therapy, and we conclude by discussing early clinical trials in humans., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The cornea is a multi-layered structure which allows fine refraction and provides both resistance to external insults and adequate transparency. The corneal endothelium ensures stromal hydration, failure of which, such as in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, after trauma or in aging, may lead to loss of corneal transparency and induce blindness. Currently, no efficient therapeutic alternatives exist except for corneal grafting. Thus corneal tissue engineering represents a valuable alternative approach, which may overcome cornea donor shortage. Several studies describe protocols to isolate, differentiate, and cultivate corneal endothelial cells (CEnCs) in vitro. Two main in vitro strategies can be described: expansion of eye-native cell populations, such as CEnCs, or the production and expansion of CEnCs from non-eye native cell populations, such as induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs). The challenge with these cells is to obtain a monolayer of CEnCs on a biocompatible carrier, with a specific morphology (flat hexagonal cells), and with specific functions such as programmed cell cycle arrest. Another issue for this cell culture methodology is to define the adapted protocol (media, trophic factors, timeframe) that can mimic physiological development. Additionally, contamination by other cell types still represents a huge problem. Thus, purification methods, such as Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS), Magnetic Ativated Cell Sorting (MACS) or Sedimentation Field Flow Fractionation (SdFFF) are useful. Animal models are also crucial to provide a translational approach for these therapies, integrating macro- and microenvironment influences, systemic hormonal or immune responses, and exogenous interactions. Non-eye native cell graft protocols are constantly improving both in efficacy and safety, with the aim of being the most suitable candidate for corneal therapies in future routine practice. The aim of this work is to review these different aspects with a special focus on issues facing CEnC culture in vitro, and to highlight animal graft models adapted to screen the efficacy of these different protocols., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The human corneal endothelium (CE) is a post-mitotic monolayer of endothelial cells, thought to be incapable of in vivo regeneration. Dysfunction of the CE is a commonly cited indication for corneal transplantation, with corneal blindness being the fifth most common cause of blindness globally. In 2012 alone 184,576 corneal transplants were performed in 116 countries (Gain et al., 2016). Presently, outcomes following human corneal transplantation have been reported to have over 97% success rate in restoring the recipient's vision (Patel et al., 2019). However, the continuing demand for cadaveric human corneas has driven research into alternative sources of CE and with the advent of protocols to produce cultured hCECs there is now the potential for cell therapy to regenerate the damaged CE. This review aims to examine the merits and limitations of different types of human and animal models used so far to test the concept of CE cell therapy., (Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)