1. Declines in motor transfer following upper extremity task-specific training in older adults
- Author
-
Bergen E. Lindauer, Sydney Y. Schaefer, Christopher S. Walter, and Caitlin R. Hengge
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Aging ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Functional training ,Activities of daily living ,Transfer, Psychology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,education ,Biochemistry ,Article ,Task (project management) ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Endocrinology ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Genetics ,medicine ,Humans ,Molecular Biology ,Motor skill ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Rehabilitation ,Age Factors ,Regression analysis ,Cell Biology ,Middle Aged ,030104 developmental biology ,Group analysis ,Motor Skills ,Female ,Motor learning ,Psychology ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background Age-related declines in function can limit older adults' independence with activities of daily living (ADLs). While task-specific training maybe a viable approach to improve function, limited clinical resources prevent extensive training on wide ranges of skills and contexts. Thus, training on one task for the benefit of another (i.e., transfer) is important in geriatric physical rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to test whether motor transfer would occur between two functionally different upper extremity tasks that simulate ADLs in a sample of older adults following task-specific training. Methods Ninety community dwelling adults ages 43 to 94 years old performed two trials of a functional dexterity and functional reaching task at baseline, and were then assigned to one of two groups. The training group completed 3 days of task-specific training (150 trials) on the functional reaching task, whereas the no-training group received no training on either task. Both groups were re-tested on both tasks at the end of Day 3. Results No significant interactions were observed between group (training vs. no-training) and time (baseline vs. re-test) on the functional dexterity task (i.e. transfer task), indicating no difference in the average amount of change from baseline to re-test between the groups. However, post hoc bivariate linear regression revealed an effect of age on motor transfer within the training group. For those who trained on the functional reaching task, the amount of transfer to the dexterity task was inversely related to age. There was no significant relationship between age and motor transfer for the no-training group. Discussion and conclusions Results of our a priori group analysis suggest that functional reaching training did not, on average, transfer to the dexterity task. However, post hoc regression analysis showed that motor transfer was both experience- and age-dependent, such that motor transfer may decline with advanced age. Future research will consider how functional and cognitive aging influences transfer of motor skills across different activities of daily living.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF