Search

In guinea pigs, macroscopic cutaneous reactions to initial (primary) Ixodes holocyclus feeding were first apparent at 96 hr post-tick attachment, peaked at 7 days (5 mm), and were gone by Day 14. Microscopic analyses of these primary tick feeding sites at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hr post-attachment revealed the dominance mononuclear cells (63-94% of the infiltrate) at all times. Neutrophil levels were high initially (34% of the infiltrate), but quickly subsided to 6-15% of the cellular response. Eosinophils were essentially absent from primary sites, comprising only 1-3% of the infiltrate. Basophils were absent initially, but accumulated in small but significant numbers (12% of the infiltrate) at the epidermal-dermal border by 96 hr post-tick attachment, 3 days prior to maximum erythematous skin reactions. In sensitized and challenged (secondary) animals, erythematous reactions in response to secondary tick feeding were apparent as early as 18 hr post-tick attachment with peak responses at 48 hr (3-4 mm). Cutaneous leukocyte responses to challenge feedings were quantitated at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hr post-tick attachment and consisted initially (12-24 hr) of a strong mononuclear cell response (72-79% of the infiltrate) that was replaced by a dominant basophil response at 48 and 72 hr. Strong cutaneous basophil responses coincided with a significant level of tick rejection. Eosinophils and neutrophils were virtually absent from these secondary responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Guinea pig recipients of anti-tick immune serum or immune peritoneal exudate cells expressed 25 and 30% tick rejection, respectively, when challenged with Amblyomma americanum larval ticks. Previous studies have shown that IgG1 antibodies are responsible for the ability of immune serum to transfer resistance to ticks and to mediate the accompanying, and required, cutaneous basophil response. Since IgG1 antibodies induce mast cell-mediated passive cutaneous anaphylaxis and cutaneous basophil responses by interaction with cell surface Fc receptors, we investigated whether host Fc receptors were involved in the mechanism of antibody-mediated immune resistance to ticks. Recipients of immune serum pretreated intravenously with rabbit IgG failed to express resistance when challenged. In contrast, recipients of immune peritoneal exudate cells similarly pretreated expressed normal resistance. Sheep IgG had no inhibitory effect on the transfer of resistance by either immune serum or peritoneal exudate cells. Furthermore, recipients of immune serum pretreated with the Fc fragment from papain digestion of rabbit IgG failed to express resistance when challenged with ticks. Rabbit Fab and sheep Fc and Fab had no effect on the transfer of resistance by immune serum. Purity of rabbit Fc preparations was verified by the ability to inhibit mast cell-mediated passive cutaneous anaphylaxis due to high-titered IgG1 antiovalbumin antibodies. Rabbit Fab and sheep Fc fractions did not inhibit passive cutaneous anaphylaxis reactions. These findings suggest that immunoglobulin Fc receptors on host cells, such as mast cells and basophils, are required for antibody-mediated immune rejection of ticks from guinea pigs.

Crude salivary gland derived proteins from Amblyomma americanum ticks were analyzed by physiochemical (gel filtration and ion exchange chromatography) and immunochemical guinea pig IgG1 (anti-tick immunoaffinity column) techniques for the presence of antigens responsible for the induction of host immune resistance responses. Gel filtration (G-75 Sephadex) and ion exchange (diethyl aminoethyl cellulose) chromatography of crude salivary gland antigen yielded multiple fractions, but only one fraction from each procedure induced significant cutaneous anaphylaxis bluing reactions when used for skin tests in tick sensitized animals treated intravenously with 0.5% Evans blue dye. Salivary gland antigen (200 ng) eluted from the immunoaffinity column by 0.2 M Na2CO3, pH 11.3, and emulsified with incomplete Freund's adjuvant conferred a significant level of tick rejection (24%, P less than 0.001) on naive guinea pigs compared with that seen in controls, but less than (P less than 0.01) the level of immunity conferred by crude salivary gland antigen (380 micrograms). The immunizing dose of immunoaffinity purified salivary gland antigen was 1/1900 the dose of the crude antigen preparation representing 99.9% purification. Furthermore, engorged ticks from animals immunized with salivary gland antigen exhibited a significant decrease (P less than 0.001) in weight compared with ticks from naive animals. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of 125I labeled proteins in the Na2CO3 eluate and the skin reactive fraction from gel filtration and ion-exchange chromatography, after immunoprecipitation with a guinea pig IgG1 antibody to the tick that transferred resistance, revealed the presence of a 20 kDa weight protein reported previously to be the antigen responsible for the induction of host resistance. These studies present physiochemical and immunochemical procedures for the purification of an important tick protein that induces skin reactions in tick sensitized guinea pigs, is recognized by antibody to the tick, and most importantly, is capable of immunizing naive guinea pigs against tick challenge.

Cutaneous lesions elicited in guinea pigs by primary and secondary feeding populations of the argasid tick, Ornithodorus tartakovskyi, were analyzed by light and electron microscopy. Small clusters of basophils appeared at primary bite sites within 24 hr of tick attachment, and by 72 hr constituted approximately 11% of the total leukocytes. Secondary feeding sites exhibited an augmented cellular infiltrate that was dominated by basophils at all times (48-56% of total cells). Eosinophil proliferation was minimal, however, and the remaining cells were of the mononuclear type. Despite mounting a strong cutaneous basophil response of the kind that mediates immune rejection of prolonged-feeding ixodid ticks, the guinea pigs showed no resistance to the fast-feeding Argasidae. It is suggested that argasid ticks probably complete their blood meal prior to basophil arrival at the bite site. Electron microscopy indicated that the number of epidermal Langerhans cells increased with time in both primary and secondary lesions; these cells were more numerous in challenge infections however, and seemed also to occur in the dermis. Basophils at secondary bite sites exhibited three kinds of structural alterations classified as: (1) piecemeal alterations--involving a vesicular degranulation mechanism; (2) an anaphylactic-type of alteration--involving single or compound exocytosis of whole granules; and (3) cytotoxic alterations culminating in complete disintegration. The majority of basophils in 72 hr secondary lesions exhibited cytotoxic alterations. It is suggested that such changes result from contact with tick-derived toxins or enzymes.

Histological analyses of larval Rhipicephalus appendiculatus feeding sites in naive and actively sensitized guinea pigs were made at 6, 24, 48, 72, 96 hr post-tick attachment. As primary feedings progressed the cavity at the entrance of the ticks mouthparts into the uppermost dermis, and the surrounding cellular infiltrate (lesion) both increased. Early (6 hr) lesions were dominated by eosinophils again predominated at 72 hr (44%), and finally basophils were dominant at 96 hr increased as tick feeding progressed and at each observation time was at least twice that observed in primary feedings. Dermal cavities at the site of entrance of the ticks mouthparts were occasional in occurrence and were reduced in size indicating altered tick feeding. Basophils were dominant at all observation times ranging from 61 to 91% of the infiltrate. The second cell type of significance was the eosinophil, ranging in abundance from 7 to 21%. Recipients of immune serum had a smaller cellular filtrate around feeding ticks, but basophils were also dominant. Basophils appear to be the principal host cell involved in acquired resistance to tick feeding as indicated by the profound cutaneous basophil reaction that characterized the immune response to larval ticks both in actively and passively sensitized hosts. The finding of significant eosinophil accumulations at tick feeding sites of both hosts indicates that these cells may also contribute to acquired resistance.