Search

The approval of antifibrotic agents nintedanib and pirfenidone revolutionized the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). These treatments showed acceptable tolerability in randomized-clinical trials; however, they have been associated with a spectrum of potential side effects which require careful assessment of risks and benefits in the individual patient before commencing and during antifibrotic therapy.The accrued evidence on safety of nintedanib and pirfenidone is summarized, from the first randomized clinical trials to the open-label extension studies and post-marketing clinical experiences which helped clarify the long-term tolerability of these drugs.The data collected over the last years confirmed the comparable tolerability profile of nintedanib and pirfenidone. The physician's assessment of expected side effects may help decide the optimal first-line therapy for the individual patient. Patient's counseling during treatment remains essential to manage emerging adverse events and eventually inform the decision of drug discontinuation.

The management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been transformed by the recent approval of two anti-fibrotic drugs, nintedanib and pirfenidone. An increasing number of patients with IPF are receiving treatment with these novel therapies, and the risk of adverse events that may be associated with their use must be carefully evaluated. Areas covered: Safety data about nintedanib and pirfenidone is critically evaluated, including data from randomized clinical trials and post-marketing reports. Management strategies to minimize the occurrence of side effects are summarized. Expert opinion: The safety profile of the two anti-fibrotic drugs approved for clinical use in IPF patients appears to be comparable. Data from clinical trials and initial post-marketing surveillance indicate that most of the observed side effects are mild and easily manageable. However, approximately 1/5 of patients may discontinue treatment as a consequence of side effects. Careful patient counselling, and regular follow-up during therapy could reduce the rate of discontinuations. Ongoing post-marketing surveillance may further inform our understanding of the safety profile of these therapies.