Search

This study aims to assess the changes of lipid profile in chronic HCV patients; before, during, and after treatment with DAAs and their association with treatment response.301 chronic HCV patients who received SOF-based therapy were included. Serum lipid profile was assessed at different check points; baseline, 6 weeks on treatment, end of treatment (EOT) and 12 weeks after EOT; and compared between SVR and non-SVR groups.SVR group had significantly higher baseline lipid parameters compared to non-SVR group with significant increase in lipid parameters at different time points apart from HDL-C. Non-SVR group showed non-significant change in lipid parameters apart from LDL-C. On week6 on treatment, cholesterol level125 mg/dl was 92.8% sensitive, 97.3% specific with 95.5% NPV, and AUC of 0.989 in prediction of SVR. Similarly, LDL57 mg/dl was 83.7% sensitive, 100% specific with 93.3%, NPV and AUC of 0.952. Baseline cholesterol and LDL were significantly associated with SVR.Higher baseline lipid parameters and their further elevation starting from week 6 on treatment are good predictors of SVR in HCV patients. Successful HCV therapy with DAAs is associated with a significant increase in lipid parameters.

Background: Liver fibrosis assessment is a key factor for disease management in hepatitis B virus (HBV). Several serum biomarkers have been introduced for noninvasive fibrosis assessment. This study aims to evaluate the validity of simple noninvasive indices, namely Fibrosis-4 score (FIB4), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), Goteborg University Cirrhosis Index (GUCI), and fibrosis index in evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic HBV.Methods: 226 patients with chronic HBV genotype D were included. FIB4, APRI, GUCI, and fibrosis index were performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to predict ≥F2 fibrosis.Results: The mean age of patients was 39.00 years and 72.27% of patients were treatment naive. Patients with ≥F2 hepatic fibrosis had significantly higher FIB-4 (1.58 ± 1.46 vs. 1.15 ± 1.09), APRI (0.68 ± 0.71 vs. 0.43 ± 0.37), GUCI score (0.75 ± 0.94 vs. 0.42 ± 0.29) and Fibrosis index (2.18 ± 0.84 vs. 1.84 ± 0.69). All studied indices were able to diagnose ≥F2 fibrosis. APRI had the highest area under the ROC (AUROC) of 0.67. Predictivity of all indices was higher in on-treatment vs naive patients.Conclusion: FIB4, APRI, and GUCI scores are acceptable, noninvasive, and cheap simple indices that can be helpful on treatment follow-up of fibrosis regression in the setting of low socioeconomic conditions compared to the relatively expensive fibroscan modality.

Objectives: To assess the role of baseline liver stiffness (LS) by Transient elastography (TE) and FIB-4 in the prediction of virological response to sofosbuvir - based regimens in chronic HCV patients.Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study including 7256 chronic HCV patients who received different sofosbuvir-based regimens. Baseline demographic and laboratory data were recorded. TE was performed with FIB-4 calculation at baseline.Results: Sustained virological response at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12) was 91.4%. Pretreatment TE values and FIB-4 were significantly lower among sustained responders (17.8 ± 11.5 kPa, 2.66 ± 1.98, respectively) versus relapsers (24.5 ± 13.9 kPa, 4.02 ± 3.3, respectively). Best cutoff levels for LS by TE and FIB-4 score for prediction of failure to treatment response were 16.7 kPa and 2.4, respectively. Among different treatment protocol, patients with FIB-4 > 2.4, TE values >16.7 kPa are more prone to treatment failure except when using SOF/SIM treatment regimens.Conclusion: Baseline LS by TE and FIB-4 score may be useful for predicting treatment outcome in the new era of DAAs and could be integrated into pretreatment assessment of chronic HCV patients for better optimization of patient management.