Search

Corporate financial distress prediction research has been ongoing for more than half a century, during which many models have emerged, among which ensemble learning algorithms are the most accurate. Most of the state-of-the-art methods of recent years are based on gradient boosted decision trees. However, most of them do not consider using feature importance for feature selection, and a few of them use the feature importance method with bias, which may not reflect the true importance of features. To solve this problem, a heuristic algorithm based on permutation importance (PIMP) is proposed to modify the biased feature importance measure in this paper. This method ranks and filters the features used by machine learning models, which not only improves accuracy but also makes the results more interpretable. Based on financial data from 4,167 listed companies in China between 2001 and 2019, the experiment shows that compared with using the random forest (RF) wrapper method alone, the bias in feature importance is indeed corrected by combining the PIMP method. After the redundant features are removed, the performance of most machine learning models is improved. The PIMP method is a promising addition to the existing financial distress prediction methods. Moreover, compared with traditional statistical learning models and other machine learning models, the proposed PIMP-XGBoost offers higher prediction accuracy and clearer interpretation, making it suitable for commercial use. • The model Combines a corrected feature selection measure and XGBoost. • Permutation importance can correct the bias of feature importance. • The model is validated on Chinese listed companies datasets over five metrics. • The model is proved to outperform several benchmark techniques. • The feature importance and partial dependence plot enhance model interpretation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Due to the important role of financial distress prediction (FDP) for enterprises, it is crucial to improve the accuracy of FDP model. In recent years, classifier ensemble has shown promising advantage over single classifier, but the study on classifier ensemble methods for FDP is still not comprehensive enough and leaves to be further explored. This paper constructs AdaBoost ensemble respectively with single attribute test (SAT) and decision tree (DT) for FDP, and empirically compares them with single DT and support vector machine (SVM). After designing the framework of AdaBoost ensemble method for FDP, the article describes AdaBoost algorithm as well as SAT and DT algorithm in detail, which is followed by the combination mechanism of multiple classifiers. On the initial sample of 692 Chinese listed companies and 41 financial ratios, 30 times of holdout experiments are carried out for FDP respectively one year, two years, and three years in advance. In terms of experimental results, AdaBoost ensemble with SAT outperforms AdaBoost ensemble with DT, single DT classifier and single SVM classifier. As a conclusion, the choice of weak learner is crucial to the performance of AdaBoost ensemble, and AdaBoost ensemble with SAT is more suitable for FDP of Chinese listed companies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: How to effectively predict financial distress is an important problem in corporate financial management. Though much attention has been paid to financial distress prediction methods based on single classifier, its limitation of uncertainty and benefit of multiple classifier combination for financial distress prediction has also been neglected. This paper puts forward a financial distress prediction method based on weighted majority voting combination of multiple classifiers. The framework of multiple classifier combination system, model of weighted majority voting combination, basic classifiers’ voting weight model and basic classifiers’ selection principles are discussed in detail. Empirical experiment with Chinese listed companies’ real world data indicates that this method can greatly improve the average prediction accuracy and stability, and it is more suitable for financial distress prediction than single classifiers. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]