Search

Decision-making problem is a fundamental activity in human life every day. Regarding group decision-making, individuals have insufficient comprehension of the decision objects owing to the limited experience and knowledge and drawback the evaluation process. Therefore, the evaluation information is missing and the group cannot get the precise information for decision objects resulting in the generation of incomplete information systems. It is meaningful for individuals finding an approach to Leverage and tap into existing information. On the basis, the work presented in this paper focuses on group decision-making problems (GDM) with incomplete information. Under the framework of group decision-making, a GDM approach with an incomplete information system is presented combining the formal concept analysis and rough set theory. Firstly, we propose a concept called formal decision context and discuss the properties of the formal decision context, which could divide the incomplete information system into many cognitive units, and the definitions of cognitive units will be given. Then, the property and the relations of various cognitive units will be discussed. Additionally, the upper and lower approximation space under the formal decision context is founded considering the risk attitudes integrating fuzzy rough set and formal concept context. Considering the order relation of various cognitive units and decision objects, we introduce the dominance relation and the importance degree of each cognitive unit under the framework of formal decision context. Furthermore, a theoretical framework of the multi-criteria decision-making problem is presented and two models for the multi-criteria group decision-making problem are discussed combined with fuzzy rough set and formal decision context from two perspectives, including qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. Finally, an illustrated example is applied to verify the validity and effectiveness of the proposed models. The contributions of this paper include two aspects. On the one hand, this paper provides a new perspective and paradigm considering MCGDM problems with the incomplete information system from the perspective of group consensus. On the other hand, this paper gives two approaches for group decision-making problems from sorting and set theory by the perspective of multi-granular rough set and group consensus. • A model of formal decision context with incomplete information to describe the cognitive situation. • An approach to MCDM problem combined rough set with formal decision context with incomplete information. • Two approaches to MCGDM problem from qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last twenty years, patient opinions of the received healthcare services have emerged as a crucial quality indicator and a valuable instrument for evaluating the service quality of health organizations. However, many surveyors still utilized uncertain information for conducting this evaluation process. Whereas, in the past few years, the issues of inconsistency, indeterminacy, and uncertainty in data have been growing and have become a matter of concern in dealing with decision-making issues. This paper proposes an improved RAFSI method based on a single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic number (SVTraNN) as a multi-attribute framework for dealing with a healthcare service quality evaluation. The proposed framework consists of two features: a feature for determining numerical criteria weights involving the procedures of the Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) and a feature for selecting the best polyclinic through contributing our new SVTraNN Harmonic and arithmetic mean to yield criterion functions in the RAFSI method. This paper then compares the results obtained by the proposed method with other SVTraNN decision-making methods. A comparative analysis and rank reversal testing of the improved method demonstrated that the multi-attribute framework proffers the option of capability and stability in overcoming inconsistency, indeterminacy, and uncertainty information efficiently during the healthcare service quality evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper proposes a rectified complex spherical fuzzy set (rCTSFS) model that enables the phase term of a complex number to function truthfully to its inherent meaning of representing directions, phases, or color hues. In addition, this paper proposes the score and accuracy functions for rectified complex spherical fuzzy numbers (rCTSFn), which allows the three types of membership degrees of an rCTSFn to fulfill human judgment/intuition. The proposed rCTSFS model proves to be a productive extension of the complex spherical fuzzy set (CSFS), complex fuzzy set (CFS), and spherical fuzzy set (SFS) models. On the other hand, Dombi t -norms prove more flexible and comprehensive than some of the other families of triangular norms, such as the algebraic t -norms and the Einstein t -norms, due to the presence of a parameter γ. The parameter γ determines the amount of aggressiveness at estimating the maximum and the minimum of a population based on a sample obtained. Therefore, this paper proposes two Dombi-Choquet integral operators, namely, the rectified complex t -spherical fuzzy arithmetic Dombi-Choquet integral (r C T S F A γ , w λ ) operator and the rectified complex t -spherical fuzzy geometric Dombi-Choquet integral (r C T S F G γ , w λ ) operator. A multi-criteria decision making (abbr. MCDM) algorithm utilizing the two Dombi-Choquet integral operators is innovated. The proposed Dombi-Choquet MCDM algorithm for the rCTSFS model is applied to an MCDM problem related to diabetic retinopathy detection on five real-life fundus images of different severity levels taken from the Messidor2 dataset. Our newly proposed algorithm proves to be the only algorithm that yields the correct diagnostic results that match the hard truth. On the other hand, none of the 50 algorithms observed among recent works in literature can produce the correct diagnostic results, even after lending the fuzzification procedure innovated in this work to them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Study analyzes 1374 papers on sensitivity analysis in Scopus. • RStudio, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer are used. • China has most articles published; India leads in international cooperation. • Top three cited journals: J. Clean. Prod., Expert Syst. Appl., and Comput. Ind. Eng. • Most cited authors are Pamučar D, Kahraman C, and Zavadskas EK. In the present era, the implementation of scientifically grounded Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) has emerged as a pivotal solution to diverse decision-making challenges across various domains. Although a substantial body of exploratory, conceptual, and experimental studies exists, only 9.457% studies have incorporated sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of MCDM methods. An exhaustive scientific exploration of sensitivity analysis within the scope of MCDM is thus lacking. This research aims to address this gap through Bibliometric Analysis while examining 1374 articles published between January 2000 and March 2023 from the Scopus database. Using RStudio (Biblioshiny), CiteSpace, and VOSviewer software, the study constructs a visual representation of the most prolific countries, institutions, and authors. Impressively, China takes the lead in article publications, while India excels in international collaboration. "An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision-making method for green supplier selection in an interval type-2 fuzzy environment," featured in the Journal of Environmental Management, emerges as the most cited paper with a total citation of 455. The study also identifies the top three most cited journals, namely "Journal of Cleaner Production," "Expert Systems With Applications," and "Computers and Industrial Engineering." "North China Electric Power University" is the leading institute with the highest research outputs. "Pamučar D" is the most cited author, with 2594 citations and 39 articles, followed by "Kahraman C" and "Zavadskas EK. This study sheds light on trends in scientific developments and collaborations, providing a model for the application of sensitivity analysis in MCDM research and highlighting global trends. An understanding of the current state of sensitivity analysis research can assist researchers working in the entire domain of MCDM. Additionally, the visualization provides prescriptive data for future work and applications related to sensitivity analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The centroid distance of PFNs is proposed and its properties are discussed. • Propose a score function based on the centroid distance and discuss its properties. • Applications of Pythagorean fuzzy clustering, ranking and MCDM are developed. • Some advantages of the proposed methods are showed through comparative analysis. By using Pythagorean fuzzy set (PFS), people can quantitatively describe and process information with fuzziness, and then make reasonable and effective judgments or decisions. In this process, distance measure often serves as a useful and important tool. The purpose of this paper is to explore some information processing methods and techniques in Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Firstly, the research progress of PFS is reviewed, and the main research directions and some hot issues in relevant research fields are discussed. Secondly, by analyzing the information of hesitation degree of Pythagorean fuzzy number (PFN), definitions of hesitation factor and centroid distance measure based on the representation of centroid coordinates of the hesitation regions are proposed, and properties of hesitation factor and centroid distance measure are discussed. Finally, the novel clustering algorithm, ranking method and multi criteria decision making (MCDM) method are developed in Pythagorean fuzzy environment, which are based on the new centroid distance measure. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm and methods are verified through numerical examples and comparative analysis. The research results indicate that the centroid distance measure proposed in this paper can effectively characterize the distance between PFNs, thus making the clustering algorithm of PFNs, the ranking method of PFNs, and the Pythagorean fuzzy MCDM method have obvious superiorities and advantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Smart cities are technological settlements using the collected data to utilize resources and services effectively by combining information and communication technologies with various tools connected to the internet of things network. Sustainable energy systems in smart cities are systems can be evaluated by using multiple criteria decision making methods or methodologies based on several vague/imprecise evaluation criteria. In this paper, sustainable energy systems in smart cities are evaluated by interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy (IVPF) sets with an integrated optimization based multi-expert fuzzy Best Worst Method (BWM) and TOPSIS methodology that can better handle uncertainty and vagueness in experts' linguistic assessments than existing methodologies. The considered criteria are weighted by multi-expert IVPF Best Worst Method, which has become a popular weighting method in recent years. Later, the energy alternatives for a real case study are prioritized by multi-expert IVPF TOPSIS method. In the analysis, the most important criterion is found as Environmental sustainability (C1) with the defuzzified weight of 0.218 while the other weights are as initial investment (C2) with 0.196, operating expenses (C3) with 0.163, technical feasibility (C4) with 0.154, social acceptability (C5) with 0.140, and scalability (C6) with 0.129. The obtained results indicate that "Investing in advanced technologies" in a smart city with relative degree of closeness (RDC) value of 0.798, has been determined as the best alternative among the considered five alternatives. It is closely followed by "Developing a transportation system" with the RDC value of 0.681. Sensitivity analysis shows that the ranking results are quite robust and reliable. The comparative analysis with crisp BWM and TOPSIS methodology is applied to check the validity of the proposed methodology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique to rank alternatives is a well-known area of study in which aggregation operators, such as ordered weighted averaging (OWA) and induced OWA (IOWA) operators, play an important role in merging information and producing an overall ranking. The distance measures from ideal argument values in aggregation operators have gained attention in recent literature. Distance measures are traditionally used as argument variables, which leads to the depiction that the attribute cannot be aggregated directly. In this paper, a generalized form of distance-induced OWA (DIOWA) operators is proposed with distance measures used as order-inducing variables. A distinctive benefit of DIOWA operators is that they permit us to consider ideal argument values while simultaneously also taking the attribute values as argument variables. Three variants of DIOWA operators are proposed and investigated, namely a) the Hamming distance-induced OWA (HDIOWA) operator, b) the normalized Hamming distance-induced OWA (NHDIOWA) operator, and c) the weighted Hamming distance-induced OWA (WHDIOWA) operator. We highlight their important properties and provide proofs to necessary theorems, and also suggest the determination methods for calculating their associated weights. We discuss further extensions of the proposed DIOWA operators with the help of generalized and quasi-arithmetic means. We discuss the use of our proposed family of operators for two different decision making situations, and demonstrate their validity by an illustrative numerical example. Finally, we apply the proposed operators to a real-life problem of ranking Chinese provinces for their science and technology (S&T) development levels. The proposed operators are shown to be a useful addition to the aggregation toolbox for decision analysts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this paper is to propose a novel hybrid framework for evaluating and benchmarking trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare by using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques under a new fuzzy environment. To develop such a framework, a new decision matrix has been built, and then integrated with q-ROF2TL-FWZIC (q‐Rung Orthopair Fuzzy 2‐Tuple Linguistic Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency) and q-ROF2TL-CODAS (q‐Rung Orthopair Fuzzy 2‐Tuple Linguistic Combinative Distance-Based Assessment). In this integration, q-ROF2TL-FWZIC is utilized for assigning the weights of evaluation attributes of trustworthy AI, while q-ROF2TL-CODAS is employed for benchmarking trustworthy AI applications. Findings show that the q-ROF2TL-FWZIC method effectively weights the evaluation attributes. The transparency attribute receives the highest importance weight (0.173566825), whereas the human agency and oversight criterion has the lowest weight (0.105741901). The remaining attributes are distributed in between. Moreover, alternative_4 receives the highest rank order (score of 7.370410417), while alternative_13 receives the lowest rank order (score of −4.759794397). To evaluate the validity of the proposed framework, systematic ranking and sensitivity analysis assessments were employed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given that the majority of existing approaches for multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) rely solely on the preferences of decision makers (DMs) and fail to consider the various relationships between alternatives, this paper attempts to model the relevant relational structures using graphs and introduce the concept of graph neural networks (GNNs) in the context of group decision-making. By leveraging the powerful expressive capabilities of GNNs, the aim is to mine additional information pertinent to the decision-making process and screen out alternatives for the final decision. To begin, we provide a mapping of MCGDM to the graph domain and construct a corresponding relation graph among alternatives. Additionally, to deal with uncertain or vague information, we transform the group decision-making problem into a Pythagorean fuzzy environment and define a novel measure of entropy specifically designed for Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs) in the entropy weight model to determine the weights of criteria. Simultaneously, we propose a new distance measure for PFSs, which is then applied to the extended Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method to rank alternatives. Furthermore, we develop a GNNs-based Pythagorean fuzzy MCGDM approach that incorporates the aforementioned techniques for group decision-making. Finally, to validate the effectiveness and superiority of this approach, we employ it to address a supplier selection issue. Compared with baseline group decision-making approaches, our approach can indeed capture the relationships among alternatives in complex group decision-making scenarios and outperforms the best-performing baseline by nearly 2.8% in terms of ranking accuracy. • A mapping from multi-criteria group decision making to the graph domain is provided. • A normalized entropy measure is defined in Pythagorean fuzzy sets. • A modified Pythagorean fuzzy distance measure is proposed. • A Pythagorean fuzzy group decision-making approach based on graph neural networks is developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The high dimensionality of data hinders the learning ability of machine learning algorithms. Feature selection techniques can be used to reduce dimensionality, which is an important step for processing high-dimensional data. Feature selection solves this problem by removing irrelevant and redundant information, which can improve learning models, reduce calculation time, and improve learning accuracy. In this paper, a novel filter in mixed-attribute datasets for feature selection is proposed. The independent attributes are mixed or heterogeneous in the sense that both numerical and categorical attribute types may appear together in the same dataset. Based on the preordonnances theory, we use a new concept to quantify the relevance and redundancy of features even if there are heterogeneous (mixed-type) data. The technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution is one of the well-known multicriteria decision-making methods; it is utilized as a weighting and informative feature selection filter. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed method, several experiments, both simulated and real, are performed, including a comparison to other well-known filter methods. The experimental results show that, in most cases, the method yielded competitive results in comparison to other methods. • Introducing new criterions for relevance and complementarity. • Dealing with mixed-attribute datasets without requiring a preprocessing step. • The multi-criteria decision method, namely TOPSIS, is used to score the explanatory features. • Investigate the performance of the proposed filter in high-dimensional data by using simulated and real data sets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The evaluation of urban energy internet (UEI) is crucial for the establishment of low-carbon cities. This paper aims to present a hybrid decision-making framework to address UEI evaluation problems from a sustainability perspective. First, the Fermatean fuzzy Aczel-Alsina power aggregation operators are proposed to aggregate evaluation information, and the remarkable properties of these operators are explored. Then, the combined weight of the criteria is determined through the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory method and the Shannon entropy-based power weighted method within the Fermatean fuzzy circumstance. Moreover, the classic multiobjective optimization by ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form method is extended using the proposed aggregation operators. Finally, an index system was constructed from a sustainability perspective, and the level of development of the four UEI projects is assessed using the proposed method. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can provide beneficial guidelines for the construction and development of the UEI. Furthermore, the reliability and effectiveness of the proposed decision-making framework are validated through sensitivity analysis and a comparative study with existing MCDM methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the constant changes in the decision-making environment, various limitations have emerged in traditional decision-making methods, such as the inability to simultaneously consider multiple factors such as randomness, hesitation, and ambiguity, thus limiting a comprehensive grasp of the decision-maker's cognitive inputs. To address the above problems, we propose a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model based on a new fuzzy set (FS). Firstly, we define a new Z hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (ZHFLTS) and propose a visualization metric for mapping ZHFLTS into T-spherical fuzzy (T-SF) space to simplify the computation. The relevant properties of ZHFLTS are further investigated. In order to accurately measure the uncertainty of FSs, we propose the probabilistic-hesitation-fuzzy (PHF) entropy and use it as a basis to derive the potential probability distribution using the fruit fly optimization algorithm (FOA). Subsequently, an MCDM model is established based on the proposed ZHFLTS, visualization metric, and PHF entropy. The model can better solve complex decision-making problems such as TCM through example studies and comparative analyses. The research in this paper aims to cope with today's increasingly complex decision-making environments, and the introduced ZHFLTS framework and the corresponding methodology provide new ways to solve complex decision problems. • ZHFLTS is defined and a mapping method to visualize ZHFLTS in T-SF space is studied. • PHF entropy is proposed based on FOA for obtaining potential probability distribution. • A Novel MCDM model based on ZHFLTS is presented. • It proves the effectiveness of the model through instances and comparative analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is a popular branch of decision theory in which many methods have been proposed to solve MCDM real-world problems. However, in spite of the multiple methods, it is common that different of them provide the same solutions. Therefore, this paper analyzes the causes of the same solutions from different MCDM methods, studies why different normalization methods can achieve the same solutions in MCDM methods through the theory of MCDM methods, and discusses the relationship between different MCDM methods by category. To achieve such goals, MCDM methods are classified into three categories according to their ranking methods. Some traditional MCDM methods are then extended by considering general normalization methods and distance measures. Finally, the characteristics of various MCDM methods are discussed by category and their evaluation indexes are also compared. The comparison results are represented by tables and flowchart models. The relationship between different categories of MCDM methods is shown through the comparison of the evaluation indexes. The aim of the proposed method is not to replace existing MCDM methods, but to fill some present research gaps about MCDM methods. • General normalization methods and distance measures are considered in MCDM methods. • The causes of the same solutions from different MCDM methods are examined. • The characteristics of various MCDM methods are discussed by category. • The relationship between different MCDM methods is summarized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fifth-generation (5G) technology provides new possibilities for a variety of applications, but it also comes with challenges influenced by distinct aspects, such as the size of organizations that use such technology. Therefore, it is important to understand which architecture of 5G-radio access networks (RANs) is best for a given purpose; this requires an evaluation platform for assessment. This paper tackles this problem by presenting a novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) solution based on a new integrated fuzzy set. The proposed integrated approach, which is based on a Type-2 neutrosophic fuzzy environment, is developed to address the application challenges of 5G-RANs architecture evaluation, as also to face the MCDM theoretical challenge represented by ambiguities and inconsistencies among decision makers within the decision making context of the presented case study. Many MCDM techniques for weighting and selection were presented from the literature, yet many of them still suffer from inconsistencies and uncertainty. Therefore, the chosen methods in this research are unique in a way that previous issues are addressed, making them suitable for integration with Type-2 neutrosophic fuzzy environment, and therefore creating a more robust decision platform for the presented challenge in this research, as a theoretical contribution. First, a new "Type-2 Neutrosophic Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency" (T2NN-FWZIC) technique is formulated for weighting the evaluation criteria of RAN architectures. Second, another new method, namely, "Type-2 Neutrosophic Fuzzy Decision by Opinion Score Method" (T2NN-FDOSM), was formulated to select the optimal RAN architecture using the obtained weights. The weighting results by T2NN-FWZIC for the (n = 25) evaluation criteria revealed that (C 21 latency and C 22 reliability) as the most important criteria, with 0.06 value for each as opposed to (C 15 Data Processing) as the lowest weighted criteria with 0.0186 value. As for T2NN-FDOSM, a total of four 5G-RAN architectures were evaluated, including "virtualized cloud RAN" coming as the optimal one, followed by "fog RAN," "cloud RAN," and finally "heterogeneous cloud RAN." The results were confirmed by carrying out a sensitivity analysis. The outcome of this study can be used to assist future 5G-RAN developments according to business needs and to establish an assessment platform for 5G technology in different domains and applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Best-worst method (BWM) has received extensive attention because of its fewer pairwise comparisons and maintenance of consistency. Extending it to various fuzzy environments has become a hot research spot. This paper initiates a new interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF) BWM with additive consistency. Firstly, an IVIF fuzzy preference relation (IVIFPR) is viewed as a directed graph with IVIF weights. An approach is offered to distinguish the best and worst criteria by the defined score out-degree and accuracy out-degree of criteria. The concept of IVIF reference comparisons is introduced. The additive consistency of IVIF reference comparisons is acquired by that of IVIFPR using its left and right intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. We derive the relationship between the IVIF reference comparisons and the IVIF priority weight vector. Based on this relationship, a linear goal programming model is constructed to generate the IVIF priority weights. Two consistency indexes are analytically obtained and the consistency ratio is then defined to check the consistency of IVIF reference comparisons. For the unacceptably additive consistency, a new approach is put forward to enhance the consistency. Thereby, the proposed IVIF BWM is summarized step by step. Three examples of applications are furnished to demonstrate its effectiveness and validation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]