1. Likely community transmission of COVID-19 infections between neighboring, persistent hotspots in Ontario, Canada
- Author
-
Eliseos J. Mucaki, Ben C. Shirley, and Peter K. Rogan
- Subjects
Ontario ,General Immunology and Microbiology ,Incidence ,Geographic Information Sciences ,COVID-19 ,Bayes Theorem ,Infectious Disease ,General Medicine ,infectious diseases ,Biochemistry ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Virus Diseases ,Cluster Analysis ,Humans ,epidemiology ,geostatistics ,kriging ,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics ,space-time analysis ,Other Medicine and Health Sciences - Abstract
IntroductionThis study aimed to produce community-level geo-spatial mapping of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Ontario, Canada in near real-time to support decision-making. This was accomplished by area-to-area geostatistical analysis, space-time integration, and spatial interpolation of COVID-19 positive individuals.MethodsCOVID-19 cases and locations were curated for geostatistical analyses from March 2020 through June 2021, corresponding to the first, second, and third waves of infections. Daily cases were aggregated according to designated forward sortation area [FSA], and postal codes [PC] in municipal regions covering Hamilton, Kitchener/Waterloo, London, Ottawa, Toronto, and Windsor/Essex county. Hotspots were identified with area-to-area tests including Getis-Ord Gi*, Global Moran’s I spatial autocorrelation, and Local Moran’s I asymmetric clustering and outlier analyses. Case counts were also interpolated across geographic regions by Empirical Bayesian Kriging, which localizes high concentrations of COVID-19 positive tests, independent of FSA or PC boundaries. TheGeostatistical Disease Epidemiology Toolbox, which is freely-available software, automates the identification of these regions and produces digital maps for public health professionals to assist in pandemic management of contact tracing and distribution of other resources.Results/DiscussionThis study provided indicators in real-time of likely, community-level disease transmission through innovative geospatial analyses of COVID-19 incidence data. Municipal and provincial results were validated by comparisons with known outbreaks at long-term care and other high density residences and on farms. PC-level analyses revealed hotspots at higher geospatial resolution than public reports of FSAs, and often sooner. Results of different tests and kriging were compared to determine consistency among hotspot assignments. Concurrent or consecutive hotspots in close proximity suggested potential community transmission of COVID-19 from cluster and outlier analysis of neighboring PCs and by kriging. Results were also stratified by population based-categories (sex, age, and presence/absence of comorbidities). Earlier recognition of hotspots could reduce public health burdens of COVID-19 and expedite contact tracing.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF