Search

Antimicrobial peptides are an abundant group of proteinaceous compounds widely produced in the plant kingdom. Among them, the γ-thionin family, also known as plant defensins, represents one typical family and comprises low molecular mass cysteine-rich proteins, usually cationic and distributed in different plant tissues. Here, we report the purification and characterization of a novel γ-thionin from cowpea seeds ( Vigna unguiculata), named Cp-thionin II, with bactericidal activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Once the primary structure was elucidated, molecular modelling experiments were used to investigate the multimerization and mechanism of action of plant γ-thionins. Furthermore, Cp-thionin II was also localized in different tissues in cowpea seedlings during germination in contrasting conditions, to better understand the plant protection processes. The use of plant defensins in the construction of transgenic plants and also in the production of novel drugs with activity against human pathogens is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mastoparans are cationic peptides with multifunctional pharmacological properties. Mastoparan-R1 and mastoparan-R4 were computationally designed based on native mastoparan-L from wasps and have improved therapeutic potential for the control of bacterial infections. Here, we evaluated whether these peptides maintain their activity against Escherichia coli strains under a range of salt concentrations. We found that mastoparan- R1 and mastoparan-R4 preserved their activity under the conditions tested, including having antibacterial activities at physiological salt concentrations. The overall structure of the peptides was investigated using circular dichroism spectroscopy in a range of solvents. No significant changes in secondary structure were observed (random coil in aqueous solutions and a-helix in hydrophobic and anionic environments). The three-dimensional structures of mastoparan-R1 and mastoparan-R4 were elucidated through nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, revealing amphipathic a-helical segments for Leu3-Ile13 (mastoparan-R1) and Leu3-Ile14 (mastoparan- R4). Possible membrane-association mechanisms for mastoparan-R1 and mastoparan-R4 were investigated through surface plasmon resonance and leakage studies with synthetic POPC and POPC/POPG (4:1) lipid bilayers. Mastoparan-L had the highest affinity for both membrane systems, whereas the two analogs had weaker association, but improved selectivity for lysing anionic membranes. This finding was also supported by molecular dynamics simulations, in which mastoparan-R1 and mastoparan-R4 were found to have greater interactions with bacteria-like membranes compared with model mammalian membranes. Despite having a few differences in their functional and structural profiles, the mastoparan-R1 analog stood out with the highest activity, greater bacteriostatic potential, and selectivity for lysing anionic membranes. This study reinforces the potential of mastoparan-R1 as a drug candidate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the years, several studies have been performed to analyse plant–pathogen interactions. Recently, functional genomic strategies, including proteomics and transcriptomics, have contributed to the effort of defining gene and protein function and expression profiles. Using these ‘omic’ approaches, pathogenicity- and defence-related genes and proteins expressed during phytopathogen infections have been identified and enormous datasets have been accumulated. However, the understanding of molecular plant–pathogen interactions is still an intriguing area of investigation. Proteomics has dramatically evolved in the pursuit of large-scale functional assignment of candidate proteins and, by using this approach, several proteins expressed during phytopathogenic interactions have been identified. In this review, we highlight the proteins expressed during plant–virus, plant–bacterium, plant–fungus and plant–nematode interactions reported in proteomic studies, and discuss these findings considering the advantages and limitations of current proteomic tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]