Search

The primary photochemistry is similar among the flavin‐bound sensory domains of light–oxygen–voltage (LOV) photoreceptors, where upon blue‐light illumination a covalent adduct is formed on the microseconds time scale between the flavin chromophore and a strictly conserved cysteine residue. In contrast, the adduct‐state decay kinetics vary from seconds to days or longer. The molecular basis for this variation among structurally conserved LOV domains is not fully understood. Here, we selected PpSB2‐LOV, a fast‐cycling (τrec 3.5 min, 20 °C) short LOV protein from Pseudomonas putida that shares 67% sequence identity with a slow‐cycling (τrec 2467 min, 20 °C) homologous protein PpSB1‐LOV. Based on the crystal structure of the PpSB2‐LOV in the dark state reported here, we used a comparative approach, in which we combined structure and sequence information with molecular dynamic (MD) simulations to address the mechanistic basis for the vastly different adduct‐state lifetimes in the two homologous proteins. MD simulations pointed toward dynamically distinct structural region, which were subsequently targeted by site‐directed mutagenesis of PpSB2‐LOV, where we introduced single‐ and multisite substitutions exchanging them with the corresponding residues from PpSB1‐LOV. Collectively, the data presented identify key amino acids on the Aβ‐Bβ, Eα‐Fα loops, and the Fα helix, such as E27 and I66, that play a decisive role in determining the adduct lifetime. Our results additionally suggest a correlation between the solvent accessibility of the chromophore pocket and adduct‐state lifetime. The presented results add to our understanding of LOV signaling and will have important implications in tuning the signaling behavior (on/off kinetics) of LOV‐based optogenetic tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human guanylate‐binding protein 1 (hGBP1) belongs to the family of dynamin‐like proteins and is activated by addition of nucleotides, leading to protein oligomerization and stimulated GTPase activity. In vivo, hGBP1 is post‐translationally modified by attachment of a farnesyl group yielding farn‐hGBP1. In this study, hydrodynamic differences in farn‐hGBP1 and unmodified hGBP1 were investigated using dynamic light scattering (DLS), analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) and analytical size‐exclusion chromatography (SEC). In addition, we performed small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) experiments coupled with a SEC setup (SEC‐SAXS) to investigate structural properties of nonmodified hGBP1 and farn‐hGBP1 in solution. SEC‐SAXS measurements revealed that farnesylation keeps hGBP1 in its inactive monomeric and crystal‐like conformation in nucleotide‐free solution, whereas unmodified hGBP1 forms a monomer–dimer equilibrium both in the inactive ground state in nucleotide‐free solution as well as in the activated state that is trapped by addition of the nonhydrolysable GTP analogue GppNHp. Nonmodified hGBP1 is structurally perturbed as compared to farn‐hGBP. In particular, GppNHp binding leads to large structural rearrangements and higher conformational flexibility of the monomer and the dimer. Structural changes observed in the nonmodified protein are prerequisites for further oligomer assemblies of farn‐hGBP1 that occur in the presence of nucleotides. Database: All SEC‐SAXS data, corresponding fits to the data and structural models are deposited in the Small Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank [SASBDB (Nucleic Acids Res, 43, 2015, D357)] with project IDs: SASDEE8, SASDEF8, SASDEG8, SASDEH8, SASDEJ8, SASDEK8, SASDEL8 and SASDEM8. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]