Search

Diagnostic evaluation for infertility in women should be conducted in a systematic, expeditious, and cost-effective manner to identify all the relevant factors with an initial emphasis on the least invasive methods for detecting the most common causes of infertility. The purpose of this committee opinion is to provide a critical review of the current methods and procedures for the evaluation of in fertile women, and it replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2015 (Fertil Steril 2015;103:e44-50). This guidance is intended for any provider evaluating women for infertility.

Objective To determine whether follicle flushing during oocyte retrieval improves live birth or secondary outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) Women undergoing ART using autologous gametes. Intervention(s) A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials comparing follicle flushing to direct aspiration during oocyte retrieval published in English between 1989 to 2020. Main Outcome Measure(s) Live birth as primary outcome, and clinical and ongoing pregnancy, total and mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved, and operating time as secondary outcomes. Result(s) Eleven studies were included totaling 1,178 cases. No difference in live birth was demonstrated between follicle flushing and direct aspiration. Clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy were not improved with flushing. Total oocyte and MII yield were lower with flushing compared with direct aspiration. Procedure time was increased with flushing by 2 minutes in poor responders and 9 minutes in normal responders. Other sensitivity analyses did not demonstrate any changes, except the difference in MII yield was no longer statistically significant. Conclusion(s) Follicle flushing during oocyte retrieval increases procedure time and does not improve live birth or secondary ART outcomes. Randomized data do not support the use of follicle flushing as an intervention in ART.

To compare clinical and ongoing pregnancy after natural cycle (NC) intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus ovarian stimulation (OS) IUI in ovulatory women undergoing therapeutic donor insemination (TDI).Retrospective cohort.Single infertility center.A total of 76,643 IUI cycles in patients treated with intrauterine insemination were examined. Women undergoing TDI in the absence of diagnosed female factor infertility were included.NC TDI or OS TDI with either clomiphene citrate or letrozole.Clinical and ongoing pregnancies were analyzed by generalized estimating equations adjusting for age, body mass index, total motile sperm at time of insemination and cycle number. Ongoing multiple gestations were examined as a secondary outcome.Six thousand one hundred ninety-two TDI cycles from 2,343 patients (711 patients without repeated IUI cycles) met inclusion criteria and were available for analysis (3,837 NC and 2,355 OS). There was no difference in mean age between the two groups (NC, 34.2 years vs. OS, 34.3 years). Probability of clinical and ongoing pregnancy was higher in the OS cohort compared with the NC cohort (OS, 22.4% vs. NC, 18.7% and OS, 15.4% vs. NC, 14.9%, respectively). However, OS significantly increased ongoing multiple gestations (OS, 10.8% vs. NC, 2.4%).Ovarian stimulation in TDI cycles resulted in a4% increase in clinical and1% increase in ongoing pregnancy, and more than fourfold increase in ongoing multiple gestations. Natural cycle IUI should be considered as a first-line treatment for ovulatory women who need donor insemination.

Sexually transmitted infections are of major concern to reproductive specialists. Heading the list are human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 and hepatitis B and C viruses. These pathogens, which may cause incurable chronic infections, can be transmitted through assisted reproductive technologies and from infected mothers to the fetus or newborn. This document replaces the document of the same name last published in 2013 (Fertil Steril 2013;99:340-6).

Recurrent implantation failure is a challenging clinical dilemma, without consensus diagnostic criteria. Current evidence provides a starting point for clinical investigation and treatment, while novel therapeutics are being investigated. Ultimately, a consensus diagnosis is needed to inform clinical management and future investigation.

Ovarian reserve is defined as the number of oocytes remaining in the ovary, or oocyte quantity (oocyte number). Markers of ovarian reserve include hormone levels and sonographically measured features of the ovaries. These markers can be useful as predictors of oocyte yield following controlled ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval. However, they are poor predictors of reproductive potential independently from age. This document replaces the document of the same name last published in 2012 (Fertil Steril 2012;98:1407–15).

Objective To determine whether subfertility in patients with endometriosis is due to impaired endometrial receptivity by comparing pregnancy and live-birth outcomes in women with endometriosis versus two control groups without suspected endometrial factors: noninfertile patients who underwent assisted reproduction to test embryos for a single-gene disorder and couples with isolated male factor infertility. Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Multicenter private practice. Patient(s) All patients aged 24 to 44 years undergoing euploid frozen blastocysts transfer from January 2016 through March 2018. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Live birth, clinical pregnancies, pregnancy losses, and aneuploid rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles. Result(s) The analysis included 459 euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles among 328 unique patients. There were no differences in clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, or live-birth rates in patients with endometriosis compared with both control groups. The aneuploidy rates were lowest in the preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders cohort, and the endometriosis patients had aneuploidy rates similar to those of the male factor infertility patients. Conclusion(s) It is unclear whether endometriosis primarily affects in vitro fertilization outcomes via oocyte quality or the endometrium. By controlling for embryo quality using euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles, we found no difference in pregnancy outcomes in patients with endometriosis compared with patients undergoing treatment for male factor infertility and noninfertile patients.

Objective To estimate the effect of daily 81 mg low-dose aspirin (LDA) on menstrual cycle length and hormone profiles. Design Secondary analysis of a trial evaluating the effect of daily LDA or placebo on live birth among women with one or two previous pregnancy losses. Setting University medical centers. Patient(s) A total of 915 regularly menstruating women who had at least one menstrual cycle (3,190 total cycles) in which pregnancy did not occur. Intervention(s) Randomized allocation to LDA versus placebo. Main Outcome Measure(s) Menstrual cycle length and follicular and luteal phases were measured. Urinary pregnanediol glucuronide, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and estrone-3-glucuronide were assessed up to six times during the first two cycles. Generalized estimating equations estimated relative risk of short ( 75th percentile: ≥32 days) versus normal cycle length. Linear mixed models estimated mean hormone level differences with weights used to account for multiple cycles contributed per participant. Result(s) There were no significant differences in total menstrual cycle, follicular phase, or luteal phase length between LDA and placebo groups. LDA posed no greater risk of having a short versus normal-length or long versus normal-length follicular phase, or having a short versus normal-length or long versus normal-length luteal phase. There were no significant differences in hormone levels across the menstrual cycle between the LDA and placebo groups. Conclusion(s) Daily LDA use did not result in any changes to menstrual cycle, follicular phase, or luteal phase length or hormone levels across the menstrual cycle compared with placebo. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT00467363

Objective: Use of frozen sperm in non-male factor infertility is often needed in donor cycles. Most studies to date examining outcomes of fresh vs frozen sperm are unable to control for oocyte quality. Studies examining sibling oocytes represent a unique model to control for oocyte quality. A recent small study using this model found worse outcomes in the frozen group. We sought to evaluate, in a large cohort, if fresh and frozen ejaculated sperm are associated with similar pregnancy outcomes by analyzing paired donor egg recipient (DER) cycles. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort study from 2016-2019 at a large fertility center. Patients who underwent DER cycles where oocytes were split between two couples and one couple used fresh sperm and the other used frozen sperm were included. All patients with uterine factor, male factor or surgically obtained sperm were excluded. Primary outcome was Ongoing pregnancy/Live birth rate (OPR). Secondary outcome included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and miscarriage rate. GEE analysis was performed to control for confounding factors and donors providing oocytes to both study cohorts. Results: 1255 donor oocytes cycles were screened. A total of 205 unique oocytes donors were identified with oocytes inseminated with discrepant sperm in different recipient cycles. There were 698 recipient transfer cycles, 405 fresh and 293 frozen. Cohorts were similar in baseline characteristics (table 1). There were no differences in OPR/LBR with fresh vs frozen sperm (53.6% vs 55.6%, p=0.7) or clinical pregnancies (66.4% vs 63.5%, p=0.4). Spontaneous miscarriage (

Objective To determine if transferring a lower-quality embryo with a good-quality blastocyst is detrimental, given that evidence suggests that embryos can signal the endometrium and that embryo quality may affect negatively endometrial receptivity. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting In vitro fertilization center. Intervention(s) Single- versus double-embryo transfer. Patient(s) Patients with a double-embryo transfer of a good-quality blastocyst plus a lower-quality blastocyst, early blastocyst, or morula were compared with patients receiving a single good-quality blastocyst. Main Outcome Measure(s) Live birth, multiple gestation. Result(s) In this study, 4,640 in vitro fertilization cycles were analyzed. In none of the analyses did transferring a second lower-quality embryo negatively affect birth rate. In the primary analysis, transferring a second lower-quality embryo increased live birth by 10% and the multiple birth rate by 15%. The addition of a fair- or poor-quality blastocyst or early blastocyst markedly increased the twin birth rate by 22%–27% with an 8%–12% increase in live birth. The addition of a morula did not increase live birth but resulted in 12% more multiples. In women younger than 38 years, adding a lower-quality embryo increased the birth rate by 7% but resulted in 18% increase in multiples. In women 38 years or older, adding a lower-quality embryo increased the live birth rate by 9% with a 15% increase in multiples. Conclusion(s) Addition of a lower-quality embryo does not have a detrimental effect on a good-quality blastocyst and results in a small increase in live births. However, this is at the expense of a marked increase in the likelihood of multiple gestations.

This document provides guidance, background, and tips on how to recognize quality trials and focuses on evaluating the validity, importance, and relevance of clinical trial results. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2008 (Fertil Steril® 2008;90:S114–20).

Objective To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others regarding the effectiveness and safety of therapies for unexplained infertility. Methods ASRM conducted a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1968 through 2019. The ASRM Practice Committee and a task force of experts used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. Main Outcome Measure(s) Outcomes of interest included: live-birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, fertilization rate, multiple pregnancy rate, dose of treatment, rate of ovarian hyperstimulation, abortion rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate. Result(s) The literature search identified 88 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Recommendation(s) Evidence-based recommendations were developed for the following treatments for couples with unexplained infertility: natural cycle with intrauterine insemination (IUI); clomiphene citrate with intercourse; aromatase inhibitors with intercourse; gonadotropins with intercourse; clomiphene citrate with IUI; aromatase inhibitors with IUI; combination of clomiphene citrate or letrozole and gonadotropins (low dose and conventional dose) with IUI; low-dose gonadotropins with IUI; conventional-dose gonadotropins with IUI; timing of IUI; and in vitro fertilization and treatment paradigms. Conclusion(s) The treatment of unexplained infertility is by necessity empiric. For most couples, the best initial therapy is a course (typically 3 or 4 cycles) of ovarian stimulation with oral medications and intrauterine insemination (OS-IUI) followed by in vitro fertilization for those unsuccessful with OS-IUI treatments.

Postoperative adhesions are a natural consequence of surgical tissue trauma and healing and may result in infertility, pain, and bowel obstruction. Adherence to microsurgical principles and minimally invasive surgery may help to decrease postoperative adhesions. Some surgical barriers have been demonstrated to be effective for reducing postoperative adhesions, but there is no substantial evidence that their use improves fertility, decreases pain, or reduces the incidence of postoperative bowel obstruction. This document replaces the document, "Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery: a committee opinion," last published in 2013.

Objective To compare live birth and multiple gestation in patients diagnosed with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation (OS-IUI) with oral medications versus gonadotropins. Design Systemic review and meta-analysis. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) Patients undergoing OS-IUI for treatment of unexplained infertility. Intervention(s) Clomiphene, letrozole, or gonadotropins for OS-IUI. Main Outcome Measure(s) Live birth and multiple gestation. Result(s) Eight total trials were identified that met the inclusion criteria and comprised 2,989 patients undergoing 6,590 cycles. One study reported a significant increase in both live births and multiple gestations with the use of gonadotropins, two studies found an increased likelihood of live birth with the use of gonadotropins, and two studies found an increased risk of twins with gonadotropins. The relative risk of live birth in subjects receiving gonadotropins was 1.09. The relative risk of multiple gestation in subjects receiving gonadotropins was 1.06. Clinical pregnancy was higher in protocols with lax cancellation policies or higher gonadotropin doses, with subsequent increased relative risks of multiple gestations of 1.20 and 1.15, respectively. Singleton births per subject were similar between the two groups. The results did not change in per-protocol, per cycle, or fixed-effect model sensitivity analyses. Conclusion(s) For every birth gained with the use of gonadotropins, a similar increased risk of multiple gestation occurs. The randomized data do not support the use of gonadotropin for OS-IUI in women with unexplained infertility. Clinical Trial Registration Number Prospero CRD4201911998

Objective To evaluate methodologies to establish abnormal progesterone (P) levels on the day of trigger for recommending freeze only cycles. Design Threshold analysis and cost analysis. Setting Private ART practice. Patient(s) Fresh autologous ART. Interventions(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Live birth. Result(s) Fourteen established statistical methodologies for generating clinical thresholds were evaluated. These methods were applied to 7,608 fresh ART transfer cycles to generate various P thresholds which ranged widely from 0.4 to 3.0 ng/mL. Lower thresholds ranged from 0.4 to 1 ng/mL and classified the majority of cycles as abnormal as well as required very large number needed to treat (NNT) to increase one live birth. Frozen embryo transfer was cost-effective when P was ≥1.5 ng/mL, with 12% of the population having an abnormal test result and an NNT of 13. Statistical and cost-effective thresholds clustered between 1.5 and 2.0 ng/mL. Conclusion(s) Statistically significant thresholds for P were demonstrated as low as 0.4 ng/mL but resulted in a very large NNT to increase one live birth. A clinical benefit to a freeze-only approach was demonstrated above P thresholds ranging from 1.5 to 2.0 ng/dL. At these thresholds, elevated P has a demonstrable and clinically significant negative effect and captures a smaller percentage of the patient population at higher risk for fresh transfer failure, thus making freeze-only a cost-effective option.