Search

Summary The quantification of periphyton growth in situ poses numerous difficulties. The RNA/DNA ratio is widely used as a growth indicator in marine ecology. We tested its applicability as a growth indicator of periphyton in streams of different sizes. Periphyton-covered stones sampled from two different watercourses during two seasons were exposed in laboratory flumes to different light levels to induce different growth rates. The relationship between rate of biomass accrual and RNA/DNA ratio was analysed by measuring the chlorophyll-a content and the RNA and DNA content of total nucleic acid extract of the periphyton respectively. The RNA/DNA ratios showed a linear relationship with the biomass accrual at all sampling times. The slopes of these relationships varied significantly between the two watercourses, but not between seasons within the same watercourse. These results indicate that the RNA/DNA ratio can be used as a growth indicator for the periphyton studied here. We recommend that it be used to detect differences in growth rate of the same periphyton community either over time or between different treatments in ecological or ecotoxicological experiments. However, for long-term monitoring studies, we recommend taxonomic analyses of the assemblages because the observed differences in the relationship between the RNA/DNA ratio and growth rate might be attributed to community structure differences in the assemblages.

Summary We conducted a paired large-scale predation experiment over 32 months in two streams being seasonally shaded by deciduous riparian trees, using the benthivorous fish species gudgeon (Gobio gobio) and stone loach (Barbatula barbatula) as top predators. The biomass of benthic grazers and periphyton in the presence/absence of fish was measured and the periphyton production was compared with the consumption rates using a model-based approach. A three-level trophic cascade from benthivorous fish via benthic grazers to periphyton was evident from the field experiment. Integrated over the whole study period, fish reduced the biomass of benthic grazers and indirectly increased the periphyton biomass. Scenario analyses, using a simple dynamic model, indicated top-down control of periphyton to be strongest during autumn, when periphyton growth was light-limited, and weaker in the spring, when periphyton growth was not light-limited. The seasonal light supply variation was caused by shading due to deciduous riparian trees during the vegetation period. This asymmetry in temporal processes weakened the top-down control in a natural benthic community. Even though grazer biomass is naturally reduced in summer, due to the emergence of the most abundant species (mayflies), a grazer biomasses high enough to reduce the spring periphyton peak could not be sustained by the low summer periphyton growth. We suppose that the temporal decoupling of grazer biomass from periphyton biomass might be caused by the very short generation time of the primary producers (days) compared with the long generation time of the primary consumers (mostly 1 year).

Summary 1. We assessed sex-specific seasonal changes in major energy storage compounds (triglycerides, glycogen) in Gammarus fossarum and Gammarus pulex collected from the field, with respect to their reproductive activity. 2. The dynamics of stored energy followed a seasonal pattern in both species and sexes. Moreover, over a 4-year period, these changes were independent of the year in which they were investigated. Stored energy reached a peak in late winter, but was depleted in late summer and early autumn, coinciding with the reproductive periods. 3. Triglyceride (annual mean ± SD) accounted for 79.7 ± 11.9% of the total stored energy and was responsible for the seasonal pattern. In contrast, glycogen contributed a lesser percentage (20.3 ± 11.9%). Over the study period, the amount of stored energy ranged between 0.39 and 4.08 kJ g−1 dry mass (triglyceride: 0.19–3.69 kJ g−1 dry mass; glycogen: 0.14–0.80 kJ g−1 dry mass). 4. In both species, the energy reserves of males were drastically depleted shortly before the cessation of precopulatory mate guarding in the field, thus offering a bioenergetic explanation for the reproductive period in these two widespread species.

Summary 1. The spatial heterogeneity of ecosystems as well as temporal activity patterns of organisms can have far-reaching effects on predator–prey relationships. We hypothesised that spatiotemporal constraints in mesohabitat use by benthic fish predators would reduce habitat overlap with benthic invertebrates and lead to mesohabitat-specific predation risks. 2. We analysed the spatiotemporal activity patterns of two small-bodied benthivorous fishes, gudgeon (Gobio gobio) and stone loach (Barbatula barbatula), and of benthic invertebrates in a small temperate stream during three 24-h field experiments. By applying a novel method of field video observation, we monitored the spatiotemporal foraging behaviour of the fish in their natural environment. A parallel analysis of invertebrate mesohabitat use by means of small area Hess sampling allowed a direct estimation of habitat overlap at a pool–riffle scale. 3. Gudgeon showed a dominant spatial activity pattern preferring pools at all times of day, whereas stone loach used both mesohabitats but with a distinct temporal (nocturnal) activity pattern. The patterns of residence were not identical with those of active foraging. Invertebrate community composition differed significantly between mesohabitats but not between times of day. More than half of the total dissimilarity between pools and riffles was accounted for by six invertebrate taxa. Five of these were subject to higher fish predation in pools than in riffles. The total prey consumption of the two fish species together in pools was about three times as high as in riffles. Trophic niche breadth of stone loach and thus its predation range was broader than that of gudgeon. 4. These results indicate that the potential predation risk for stream invertebrates depends on the combination of spatial and temporal patterns of both predator and prey. Given the distinct differences in predation risk found between pools and riffles, we conclude that spatial heterogeneity at the mesohabitat scale can influence mechanisms and consequences of selective predation. We also suggest that the analysis of spatiotemporal predator–prey relationships should not be based on the premise that the main residence habitat and active foraging habitat of a predator are identical.

Summary 1. We conducted an experimental study of predation by benthivorous fish on a natural community of stream invertebrates using a reach-scale approach. Over a 2-year period (experimental phase), the benthic invertebrate community of a stretch containing two species of benthivorous fish was compared with a fishless stretch. Thereafter, all fish were removed and benthic community structure was analysed again to account for natural differences between the two stretches (reference phase). 2. Benthivorous fish at the moderate densities investigated did not affect total benthic biomass or density, but did alter species composition. In addition, the fish effect differed between pool and riffle habitats, with larger effects in the pools indicating a habitat-specific predation effect. In the reference phase, when all fish were removed from the stream, the difference between the two stretches was reduced. 3. The benthivorous fish reduced the densities of four taxa (Pisidium sp., Dugesia gonocephala, Gammarus pulex, Limoniidae), representing 29% of total biomass. It is possible that density reductions of other species were masked by prey migration despite the relatively large spatial scale. Indeed, higher drift activity in the upstream fishless stretch could have increased the density of Baetis rhodani in the fish stretch, as indicated by the results of a drift model. 4. Our results provide insights into stream food web ecology because fish predation showed effects even in a natural system where habitat complexity was high, environmental factors were highly variable and many predator and prey species interacted and because benthivorous fish were the focus, whereas the majority of previous predation experiments in streams have used drift-feeding trout.