Search

Glycoproteins are involved in a variety of biological processes. More than one-third of the plasma protein biomarkers of tumors approved by the FDA are glycoproteins, and could improve the diagnostic specificity and/or sensitivity. Therefore, it is of great significance to perform the systematic characterization of plasma N-glycoproteome. In previous studies, we developed an integrated method based on the combinatorial peptide ligand library (CPLL) and stepped collision energy/higher energy collisional dissociation (sceHCD) for comprehensive plasma N-glycoproteome profiling. Recently, we presented a new fragmentation method, EThcD-sceHCD, which outperformed sceHCD in the accuracy of identification. Herein, we integrated the combinatorial peptide ligand library (CPLL) into EThcD-sceHCD and compared the performance of different mass spectrometry dissociation methods (EThcD-sceHCD, EThcD, and sceHCD) in the intact N-glycopeptide analysis of prostate cancer plasma. The results illustrated that EThcD-sceHCD was better than EThcD and sceHCD in the number of identified intact N-glycopeptides (two-folds). A combination of sceHCD and EThcD-sceHCD methods can cover almost all glycoproteins (96.4%) and intact N-glycopeptides (93.6%), indicating good complementarity between the two. Our study has great potential for medium- and low-abundance plasma glycoprotein biomarker discovery.

Site-specific N-glycosylation characterization requires intact N-glycopeptide analysis based on suitable tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) method. Electron-transfer/higher-energy collisional dissociation (EThcD), stepped collision energy/higher-energy collisional dissociation (sceHCD), higher-energy collisional dissociation-product-dependent electron-transfer dissociation (HCD-pd-ETD), and a hybrid mass spectrometry fragmentation method EThcD-sceHCD have emerged as valuable approaches for glycoprotein analysis. However, each of them incurs some compromise, necessitating the systematic performance comparisons when applied to the analysis of complex clinical samples (e.g., plasma, urine, cells, and tissues). Herein, we compared the performance of EThcD-sceHCD with those previous approaches (EThcD, sceHCD, HCD-pd-ETD, and sceHCD-pd-ETD) in the intact N-glycopeptide analysis, and determined its applicability for clinical N-glycoproteomic study. The intact N-glycopeptides of distinct samples, namely, plasma from prostate cancer (PCa) patients, urine from immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) patients, human hepatocarcinoma cell line (HepG2), and thyroid tissues from thyroid cancer (TC) patients were analyzed by these methods. We found that EThcD-sceHCD outperformed other methods in the balance of depth and accuracy of intact N-glycopeptide identification, and sceHCD and EThcD-sceHCD have good complementarity. EThcD-sceHCD holds great potential for biomarker discovery from clinical samples.