Search

The 2023 World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) Open Science Conference underscored the critical need for increased climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts, along with enhanced climate knowledge and decision-making systems. This Perspective discusses climate intervention (CI) within WCRP’s research framework, emphasizing three main approaches: terrestrial carbon dioxide removal (CDR), marine CDR, and solar radiation modification (SRM). As global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, CI strategies are increasingly recognized as potentially critical supplements to traditional mitigation methods. We call for WCRP to take a leadership role in CI research, highlighting the need for inclusivity and collaboration, especially with researchers from the Global South, to establish a firm scientific foundation for an equitable and comprehensive assessment of the benefits and risks of CI approaches relative to the risks of anthropogenic climate change.

Hazards from convective weather pose a serious threat to the contiguous United States (CONUS) every year. Previous studies have examined how future projected changes in climate might impact the frequency and intensity of convective weather using simulations with both convection-permitting regional models and coarser-grid climate and Earth system models. We build on this existing literature by utilizing a large-ensemble of historical and future Earth system model simulations to investigate the time evolution of the forced responses in large-scale convective environments and how those responses might be modulated by the rich spectrum of internal climate variability. Specifically, daily data from an ensemble of 50 simulations with the most recent version of the Community Earth System Model was used to examine changes in the convective environment over the eastern CONUS during March-June from 1870 to 2100. Results indicate that anthropogenically forced changes include increases in convective available potential energy and atmospheric stability (convective inhibition) throughout this century, while tropospheric vertical wind shear is projected to decrease across much of the CONUS. Internal climate variability on decadal and longer time scales can either significantly enhance or suppress these forced changes. The time evolution of two-dimensional histograms of convective indices suggests that future springtime convective environments over the eastern CONUS may, on average, be supportive of relatively less frequent and shorter-lived, but deeper and more intense convection.

IntroductionRapid reductions in Arctic sea ice in response to warming have led to increased interest in using the Arctic Ocean for commercial shipping. As the world warms, however, different strategies are being considered to stabilize or reduce surface temperatures in order to prevent critical climate change impacts. One such strategy is stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), a form of solar climate intervention. Projected changes to Arctic sea ice under SAI with specific regards to shipping have not yet been assessed.MethodsWe compare output from two SAI simulations that have different global mean temperature targets with a non-SAI control simulation to provide the first assessment of Arctic Ocean navigability under potential SAI scenarios.ResultsWe find that sea ice concentration and thickness quickly stabilize or increase after SAI deployment. When sea ice thickness stabilizes in response to SAI, the number of days when the Arctic Ocean is navigable remains fairly constant, but increasing sea ice thickness leads to reduced navigability compared to the non-SAI simulation. From 2035-2069, both the Northwest Passage and Northern Sea Route are accessible from July-November in all three simulations, but there are no navigable routes under either SAI scenario from April-June. When the Arctic is navigable, it can take 2-12 days longer to cross the Arctic Ocean in the SAI simulations than in the non-SAI control simulation, and there are large year-to-year variations in travel time.DiscussionOverall, Arctic shipping may take longer and be more difficult in an SAI vs a non-SAI world because of relatively thicker sea ice, but the degree to which Arctic shipping may change in response to SAI is dependent on the particular climate intervention strategy.