Search

The use of mean-field models to describe the activity of large neuronal populations has become a very powerful tool for large-scale or whole brain simulations. However, the calculation of brain signals frommean-fieldmodels, such as the electric and magnetic fields, is still under development. Thus, the emergence of new methods for an accurate and efficient calculation of such brain signals is currently of great relevance. In this paper we propose a novel method to calculate the local field potentials (LFP) and magnetic fields from mean-field models. The calculation of LFP is done via a kernel method based on unitary LFP's (the LFP generated by a single axon) that was recently introduced for spiking-networks simulations and that we adapt here for mean-field models. The calculation of the magnetic field is based on current-dipole and volume-conductor models, where the secondary currents (due to the conducting extracellular medium) are estimated using the LFP calculated via the kernel method and the effects of medium-inhomogeneities are incorporated. We provide an example of the application of our method for the calculation of LFP and MEG under slow-waves of neuronal activity generated by a mean-field model of a network of Adaptive-Exponential Integrate-and-Fire (AdEx) neurons. We validate our method via comparison with results obtained from the corresponding spiking neuronal networks. Finally we provide an example of our method for whole brain simulations performed with The Virtual Brain (TVB), a recently developed tool for large scale simulations of the brain. Our method provides an efficient way of calculating electric and magnetic fields from mean-field models. This method exhibits a great potential for its application in large-scale or whole-brain simulations, where calculations via detailed biological models are not feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of mean-field models to describe the activity of large neuronal populations has become a very powerful tool for large-scale or whole brain simulations. However, the calculation of brain signals from mean-field models, such as the electric and magnetic fields, is still under development. Thus, the emergence of new methods for an accurate and efficient calculation of such brain signals is currently of great relevance. In this paper we propose a novel method to calculate the local field potentials (LFP) and magnetic fields from mean-field models. The calculation of LFP is done via a kernel method based on unitary LFP's (the LFP generated by a single axon) that was recently introduced for spiking-networks simulations and that we adapt here for mean-field models. The calculation of the magnetic field is based on current-dipole and volume-conductor models, where the secondary currents (due to the conducting extracellular medium) are estimated using the LFP calculated via the kernel method and the effects of medium-inhomogeneities are incorporated. We provide an example of the application of our method for the calculation of LFP and MEG under slow-waves of neuronal activity generated by a mean-field model of a network of Adaptive-Exponential Integrate-and-Fire (AdEx) neurons. We validate our method via comparison with results obtained from the corresponding spiking neuronal networks. Finally we provide an example of our method for whole brain simulations performed with The Virtual Brain (TVB), a recently developed tool for large scale simulations of the brain. Our method provides an efficient way of calculating electric and magnetic fields from mean-field models. This method exhibits a great potential for its application in large-scale or whole-brain simulations, where calculations via detailed biological models are not feasible.

Significant progress has been made toward model-based prediction of neral tissue activation in response to extracellular electrical stimulation, but challenges remain in the accurate and efficient estimation of distributed local field potentials (LFP). Analytical methods of estimating electric fields are a first-order approximation that may be suitable for model validation, but they are computationally expensive and cannot accurately capture boundary conditions in heterogeneous tissue. While there are many appropriate numerical methods of solving electric fields in neural tissue models, there isn't an established standard for mesh geometry nor a well-known rule for handling any mismatch in spatial resolution. Moreover, the challenge of misalignment between current sources and mesh nodes in a finite-element or resistor-network method volume conduction model needs to be further investigated. Therefore, using a previously published and validated multi-scale model of the hippocampus, the authors have formulated an algorithm for LFP estimation, and by extension, bidirectional communication between discretized and numerically solved volume conduction models and biologically detailed neural circuit models constructed in NEURON. Development of this algorithm required that we assess meshes of (i) unstructured tetrahedral and grid-based hexahedral geometries as well as (ii) differing approaches for managing the spatial misalignment of current sources and mesh nodes. The resulting algorithm is validated through the comparison of Admittance Method predicted evoked potentials with analytically estimated LFPs. Establishing this method is a critical step toward closed-loop integration of volume conductor and NEURON models that could lead to substantial improvement of the predictive power of multi-scale stimulation models of cortical tissue. These models may be used to deepen our understanding of hippocampal pathologies and the identification of efficacious electroceutical treatments.

Significant progress has been made toward model-based prediction of neral tissue activation in response to extracellular electrical stimulation, but challenges remain in the accurate and efficient estimation of distributed local field potentials (LFP). Analytical methods of estimating electric fields are a first-order approximation that may be suitable for model validation, but they are computationally expensive and cannot accurately capture boundary conditions in heterogeneous tissue. While there are many appropriate numerical methods of solving electric fields in neural tissue models, there isn't an established standard for mesh geometry nor a well-known rule for handling any mismatch in spatial resolution. Moreover, the challenge of misalignment between current sources and mesh nodes in a finite-element or resistor-network method volume conduction model needs to be further investigated. Therefore, using a previously published and validated multi-scale model of the hippocampus, the authors have formulated an algorithm for LFP estimation, and by extension, bidirectional communication between discretized and numerically solved volume conduction models and biologically detailed neural circuit models constructed in NEURON. Development of this algorithm required that we assess meshes of (i) unstructured tetrahedral and grid-based hexahedral geometries as well as (ii) differing approaches for managing the spatial misalignment of current sources and mesh nodes. The resulting algorithm is validated through the comparison of Admittance Method predicted evoked potentials with analytically estimated LFPs. Establishing this method is a critical step toward closed-loop integration of volume conductor and NEURON models that could lead to substantial improvement of the predictive power of multi-scale stimulation models of cortical tissue. These models may be used to deepen our understanding of hippocampal pathologies and the identification of efficacious electroceutical treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) provides a framework for the analysis of effective connectivity among neuronal subpopulations that subtend invasive (electrocorticograms and local field potentials) and non-invasive (electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography) electrophysiological responses. This paper reviews the suite of neuronal population models including neural masses, fields and conductance–based models that are used in DCM. These models are expressed in terms of sets of differential equations that allow one to model the synaptic underpinnings of connectivity. We describe early developments using neural mass models, where convolution-based dynamics are used to generate responses in laminar-specific populations of excitatory and inhibitory cells. We show that these models, though resting on only two simple transforms, can recapitulate the characteristics of both evoked and spectral responses observed empirically. Using an identical neuronal architecture, we show that a set of conductance based models – that consider the dynamics of specific ion-channels – present a richer space of responses; owing to nonlinear interactions between conductances and membrane potentials. We propose that conductance-based models may be more appropriate when spectra present with multiple resonances. Finally, we outline a third class of models, where each neuronal subpopulation is treated as a field; in other words, as a manifold on the cortical surface. By explicitly accounting for the spatial propagation of cortical activity through partial differential equations, we show that the topology of connectivity – through local lateral interactions among cortical layers – may be inferred, even in the absence of spatially resolved data. We also show that these models allow for a detailed analysis of structure–function relationships in the cortex. Our review highlights the relationship among these models and how the hypothesis asked of empirical data suggests an appropriate model class.

Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) provides a framework for the analysis of effective connectivity among neuronal subpopulations that subtend invasive (electrocorticograms and local field potentials) and non-invasive (electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography) electrophysiological responses. This paper reviews the suite of neuronal population models including neural masses, fields and conductance-based models that are used in DCM. These models are expressed in terms of sets of differential equations that allow one to model the synaptic underpinnings of connectivity. We describe early developments using neural mass models, where convolution-based dynamics are used to generate responses in laminar-specific populations of excitatory and inhibitory cells. We show that these models, though resting on only two simple transforms, can recapitulate the characteristics of both evoked and spectral responses observed empirically. Using an identical neuronal architecture, we show that a set of conductance based models-that consider the dynamics of specific ion-channels-present a richer space of responses; owing to non-linear interactions between conductances and membrane potentials. We propose that conductance-based models may be more appropriate when spectra present with multiple resonances. Finally, we outline a third class of models, where each neuronal subpopulation is treated as a field; in other words, as a manifold on the cortical surface. By explicitly accounting for the spatial propagation of cortical activity through partial differential equations (PDEs), we show that the topology of connectivity-through local lateral interactions among cortical layers-may be inferred, even in the absence of spatially resolved data. We also show that these models allow for a detailed analysis of structure-function relationships in the cortex. Our review highlights the relationship among these models and how the hypothesis asked of empirical data suggests an appropriate model class. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]