Search

BackgroundEndobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive technique for biopsy of lung, peri-pulmonary tissue and lymph nodes under real-time ultrasound-guided biopsy. It is used in the diagnosis and/or staging of benign and malignant pulmonary and non-pulmonary diseases. Our study is based on a large sample size, in a diversified population which provides a representative real-world cohort for analysis.MethodsPatients who underwent EBUS-TBNA procedure between September 2019 and August 2022 were included in this retrospective study. For cases diagnosed as benign and unclassified lesions by EBUS-TBNA, the final diagnosis was determined by further invasive surgery or a combination of therapy and clinical follow-up for at least 6 months.ResultsA total of 618 patients were included in the study, including 182 females (29.4%) and 436 males (70.6%). The mean age of all patients was 61.9 ± 10.5 years. These patients were successfully punctured by EBUS-TBNA to obtain pathological results. The pathological diagnosis results of EBUS-TBNA were compared with the final clinical diagnosis results as follows: 133 cases (21.5%) of benign lesions and 485 cases (78.5%) of malignant lesions were finally diagnosed. Among them, the pathological diagnosis was obtained by EBUS-TBNA in 546 patients (88.3%) (464 malignant lesions and 82 benign conditions), while EBUS-TBNA was unable to define diagnosis in 72 patients (11.6%). 20/72 non-diagnostic EBUS-TBNA were true negative. The overall diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA were 91.3%, 100%, 100%, 27.8%, and 91.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.1–93.6%], respectively. In this study, only one case had active bleeding without serious complications during the EBUS-TBNA procedure.ConclusionGiven its low invasiveness, high diagnostic accuracy, and safety, EBUS-TBNA is worth promoting in thoracic lesions.

IntroductionIt is not clear whether polymyxin B/tigecycline (PMB/TGC) combination is better than PMB or TGC alone in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs).MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in patients with HAP caused by CROs. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes included clinical success and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between antimicrobial treatments and 28-day mortality by adjusting other potential confounding factors.ResultsA total of 364 eligible patients were included in the final analysis, i.e., 99 in the PMB group, 173 in the TGC group, and 92 in the PMB/TGC combination group. The 28-day mortality rate was 28.3% (28/99) in the PMB group, 39.3% (68/173) in the TGC group, and 48.9% (45/92) in the PMB/TGC combination group (p = 0.014). The multivariate Cox regression model showed that there was a statistically significant lower risk of 28-day mortality among participants in the PMB group when compared with the PMB/TGC combination group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.81, p = 0.004] and that participants in the TGC group had a lower risk of 28-day mortality than in the PMB/TGC combination group but without statistical significance. The incidence of AKI in the PMB group (52.5%) and the PMB/TGC combination group (53.3%) was significantly higher than that in the TGC group (33.5%, p = 0.001).ConclusionThe appropriate PMB/TGC combination was not superior to appropriate PMB therapy in the treatment of HAP caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae/carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRE/CRAB) in terms of 28-day mortality.