Search

IntroductionThe neuropsychological profile of CSF1R-related leukoencephalopathy (CRL) is undefined. This study defines the profile, contrasts it with that of other dementia syndromes, and highlights measures sensitive to cognitive impairment.MethodsWe administered a standardized battery of neuropsychological tests to five consecutive CRL cases.ResultsThe neuropsychological profile of CRL reflects impaired general cognitive function, processing speed, executive function, speeded visual problem solving, verbal fluency, and self-reported depression and anxiety. Confrontation naming and memory are preserved. Within cognitive domains, certain measures more frequently identified impairment than others.DiscussionCRL impairs general cognitive function, processing speed, executive function. Language and visual problem solving may be impaired if processing speed is required. Confrontation naming and memory are uniquely preserved, contrasting CRL to other dementia syndromes. Cognitive screens excluding processing speed and executive function may not detect CRL cognitive manifestations. Findings sharply define cognitive impairment of CRL and inform cognitive test selection.

Background: No studies have reported the rate of motor complications (MC) and response to medical and surgical treatment in a population-based cohort of young-onset Parkinson's Disease (YOPD) patients and a cohort of sex-matched late-onset Parkinson's Disease (LOPD).Objective: To assess the outcomes of dopaminergic treatment in YOPD and LOPD, explore treatment-induced MC, medical adjustment, and rate of deep brain stimulation (DBS).Methods: We used the expanded Rochester Epidemiology Project (eREP) to investigate a population-based cohort of YOPD between 2010 and 2015 in 7 counties in Minnesota. Cases with onset ≤55 years of age were included as YOPD. An additional sex-matched cohort of LOPD (onset at ≥56 years of age) was included for comparison. All medical records were reviewed to confirm the diagnoses.Results: In the seven counties 2010–15, there were 28 YOPD patients, which were matched with a LOPD cohort. Sixteen (57%) YOPD had MC, as compared to 9 (32%) LOPD. In YOPD, 9 had motor fluctuations (MF) and Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) together, whereas 3 had LID only and 4 MF only. In LOPD, 3 had MF and LID, 3 MF only, and 3 LID only. Following medical treatment for MC, 6/16 YOPD (38%) and 3/9 (33%) LOPD had symptoms resolution. In YOPD, 11/16 (69%) were considered for DBS implantation, in LOPD they were 2/9 (22%), but only 7 (6 YOPD and 1 LOPD) underwent the procedure. YOPD had significantly higher rates in both DBS candidacy and DBS surgery (respectively, p = 0.03 and p = 0.04). Among DBS-YOPD, 5/6 (83%) had positive motor response to the surgery; the LOPD case had a poor response. We report the population-based incidence of both YOPD with motor complications and YOPD undergoing DBS, which were 1.17 and 0.44 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively.Conclusion: Fifty-seven percent of our YOPD patients and 32% of the LOPD had motor complications. Roughly half of both YOPD and LOPD were treatment resistant. YOPD had higher rates of DBS candidacy and surgery. Six YOPD and 1 LOPD underwent DBS implantation and most of them had a positive motor response after the surgery.