Search

Introduction: Given the wide-ranging involvement of cerebellar activity in motor, cognitive, and affective functions, clinical outcomes resulting from cerebellar damage can be hard to predict. Cerebellar vascular accidents are rare, comprising less than 5% of strokes, yet this rare patient population could provide essential information to guide our understanding of cerebellar function., Methods: To gain insight into which domains are affected following cerebellar damage, we retrospectively examined neuropsychiatric performance following cerebellar vascular accidents in cases registered on a database of patients with focal brain injuries. Neuropsychiatric testing included assessment of cognitive (working memory, language processing, and perceptual reasoning), motor (eye movements and fine motor control), and affective (depression and anxiety) domains., Results: Results indicate that cerebellar vascular accidents are more common in men and starting in the 5th decade of life, in agreement with previous reports. Additionally, in our group of twenty-six patients, statistically significant performance alterations were not detected at the group level an average of 1.3 years following the vascular accident. Marginal decreases in performance were detected in the word and color sub-scales of the Stroop task, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and the Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test., Discussion: It is well established that the acute phase of cerebellar vascular accidents can be life-threatening, largely due to brainstem compression. In the chronic phase, our findings indicate that recovery of cognitive, emotional, and affective function is likely. However, a minority of individuals may suffer significant long-term performance impairments in motor coordination, verbal working memory, and/or linguistic processing., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Muller Ewald, Deifelt Streese, Bruss, Manzel, Montilla, Gala, Tranel and Parker.)

The False Tagging Theory (FTT) is a neuroanatomical model of belief and doubt processes that proposes a single, unique function for the prefrontal cortex. Here, we review evidence pertaining to the FTT, the implications of the FTT regarding fractionation of the prefrontal cortex, and the potential benefits of the FTT for new neuroanatomical conceptualizations of executive functions. The FTT provides a parsimonious account that may help overcome theoretical problems with prefrontal cortex mediated executive control such as the homunculus critique. Control in the FTT is examined via the "heuristics and biases" psychological framework for human judgment. The evidence indicates that prefrontal cortex mediated doubting is at the core of executive functioning and may explain some biases of intuitive judgments.

We have proposed the False Tagging Theory (FTT) as a neurobiological model of belief and doubt processes. The theory posits that the prefrontal cortex is critical for normative doubt toward properly comprehended ideas or cognitions. Such doubt is important for advantageous decisions, for example in the financial and consumer purchasing realms. Here, using a neuropsychological approach, we put the FTT to an empirical test, hypothesizing that focal damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) would cause a "doubt deficit" that would result in higher credulity and purchase intention for consumer products featured in misleading advertisements. We presented 8 consumer ads to 18 patients with focal brain damage to the vmPFC, 21 patients with focal brain damage outside the prefrontal cortex, and 10 demographically similar healthy comparison participants. Patients with vmPFC damage were (1) more credulous to misleading ads; and (2) showed the highest intention to purchase the products in the misleading advertisements, relative to patients with brain damage outside the prefrontal cortex and healthy comparison participants. The pattern of findings was obtained even for ads in which the misleading bent was "corrected" by a disclaimer. The evidence is consistent with our proposal that damage to the vmPFC disrupts a "false tagging mechanism" which normally produces doubt and skepticism for cognitive representations. We suggest that the disruption increases credulity for misleading information, even when the misleading information is corrected for by a disclaimer. This mechanism could help explain poor financial decision-making when persons with ventromedial prefrontal dysfunction (e.g., caused by neurological injury or aging) are exposed to persuasive information.