Search

Background: Children with benign childhood epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes (BECT) have spikes, sharps, and composite waves on their electroencephalogram (EEG). It is necessary to detect spikes to diagnose BECT clinically. The templatematchingmethod can identify spikes effectively. However, due to the individual specificity, finding representative templates to detect spikes in actual applications is often challenging. Purpose: This paper proposes a spike detection method using functional brain networks based on phase locking value (FBN-PLV) and deep learning. Methods: To obtain high detection effect, this method uses a specific template matching method and the 'peak-to-peak' phenomenon of montages to obtain a set of candidate spikes. With the set of candidate spikes, functional brain networks (FBN) are constructed based on phase locking value (PLV) to extract the features of the network structure during spike discharge with phase synchronization. Finally, the time domain features of the candidate spikes and the structural features of the FBN-PLV are input into the artificial neural network (ANN) to identify the spikes. Results: Based on FBN-PLV and ANN, the EEG data sets of four BECT cases from the Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine are tested with the AC of 97.6%, SE of 98.3%, and SP 96.8%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modern electroceuticals are bound to employ the usage of electrical high frequency (130–180 Hz) stimulation carried out under closed loop control, most prominent in the case of movement disorders. However, particular challenges are faced when electrical recordings of neuronal tissue are carried out during high frequency electrical stimulation, both in-vivo and in-vitro. This stimulation produces undesired artifacts and can render the recorded signal only partially useful. The extent of these artifacts is often reduced by temporarily grounding the recording input during stimulation pulses. In the following study, we quantify the effects of this method, “blanking,” on the spike count and spike train statistics. Starting from a theoretical standpoint, we calculate a loss in the absolute number of action potentials, depending on: width of the blanking window, frequency of stimulation, and intrinsic neuronal activity. These calculations were then corroborated by actual high signal to noise ratio (SNR) single cell recordings. We state that, for clinically relevant frequencies of 130 Hz (used for movement disorders) and realistic blanking windows of 2 ms, up to 27% of actual existing spikes are lost. We strongly advice cautioned use of the blanking method when spike rate quantification is attempted.Impact statementBlanking (artifact removal by temporarily grounding input), depending on recording parameters, can lead to significant spike loss. Very careful use of blanking circuits is advised.

Modern electroceuticals are bound to employ the usage of electrical high frequency (130-180Hz) stimulation carried out under closed loop control, most prominent in the case of movement disorders. However, particular challenges are faced when electrical recordings of neuronal tissue are carried out during high frequency electrical stimulation, both in-vivo and in-vitro. This stimulation produces undesired artifacts and can render the recorded signal only partially useful. The extent of these artifacts is often reduced by temporarily grounding the recording input during stimulation pulses. In the following study, we quantify the effects of this method, "blanking," on the spike count and spike train statistics. Starting from a theoretical standpoint, we calculate a loss in the absolute number of action potentials, depending on: width of the blanking window, frequency of stimulation, and intrinsic neuronal activity. These calculations were then corroborated by actual high signal to noise ratio (SNR) single cell recordings. We state that, for clinically relevant frequencies of 130Hz (used for movement disorders) and realistic blanking windows of 2 ms, up to 27% of actual existing spikes are lost. We strongly advice cautioned use of the blanking method when spike rate quantification is attempted. IMPACT STATEMENT Blanking (artifact removal by temporarily grounding input), depending on recording parameters, can lead to significant spike loss. Very careful use of blanking circuits is advised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ability to track when and which neurons fire in the vicinity of an electrode, in an efficient and reliable manner can revolutionize the neuroscience field. The current bottleneck lies in spike sorting algorithms; existing methods for detecting and discriminating the activity of multiple neurons rely on inefficient, multi-step processing of extracellular recordings. In this work, we show that a single-step processing of raw (unfiltered) extracellular signals is sufficient for both the detection and identification of active neurons, thus greatly simplifying and optimizing the spike sorting approach. The efficiency and reliability of our method is demonstrated in both real and simulated data.