Search

BackgroundLimited epidemiological evidence exists concerning the impact of healthy dietary patterns on reducing the risk of cholelithiasis. We aimed to examine the association of seven established dietary patterns with subsequent cholelithiasis risk and whether this association was modified by genetic risk.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank, including 155,323 participants initially free of cholelithiasis and cholecystectomy. Dietary patterns were assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire (Oxford WebQ), covering Mediterranean Diet Score (MED), alternate Mediterranean Diet Score(aMED), overall Plant-based Diet Index (PDI), healthy Plant-based Diet Index (hPDI), unhealthy Plant-based Diet Index (uPDI), Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015) and EAT-lancet Score. Genetic risk was quantified and stratified by a polygenic risk score (PRS) incorporating 13 known cholelithiasis-associated loci. Cox proportional hazards regression was employed to estimate the association between dietary patterns, PRS, and cholelithiasis incidence, adjusting for potential confounders.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 13.3 years, 5,056 cases of cholelithiasis were identified. After adjusting for potential confounders, adherence to aMED and HEI-2015 dietary patterns reduced cholelithiasis risk by 10% (HR: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.83–0.98) and 11% (HR: 0.89; 95%CI: 0.82–0.96), respectively. A significant decrease in cholelithiasis risk was observed across PRS quintiles, low PRS was associated with a 16% reduced risk (HR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.77–0.92). Participants with both high dietary scores and low genetic risk had the lowest cholelithiasis risk, with an HR of 0.76 (95%CI: 0.64–0.91) for aMED and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.61–0.88) for HEI-2015.ConclusionHigher adherence to aMED and HEI-2015 might significantly decrease the risk of cholelithiasis, irrespective of genetic risk. Our results highlighted the potential of diet intervention for cholelithiasis prevention in the general population.

BackgroundObesity is a common and highly convincing risk factor for many cancers, including liver cancer. Sex disparities in the body composition and regulatory mechanisms involved in energy homeostasis may contribute to the difference in the incidence of cancer. However, evidence on the gender-specific association between body composition and liver cancer incidence is limited. We performed this study to investigate the linear and non-linear associations of body composition with liver cancer risk by gender.Materials and methodsThis prospective analysis included 4,75,659 participants free of cancer, based on the UK Biobank. We used Cox proportional hazard models to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after adjusting for potential confounders. Restricted cubic spline was performed to investigate the potential non-linear associations.ResultsDuring a median follow-up, 275 cases (174 male patients and 101 female patients) of liver cancer were identified. Male patients in the highest body fat percentage group are more likely to develop liver cancer (HR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.17–3.03) compared with those in the lowest group. The one-unit increase of whole-body fat mass, arm fat mass, and trunk fat mass was associated with 1.03-, 1.14-, and 1.05-fold increased risk of liver cancer in male subjects, respectively. U-shaped associations of body composition with liver cancer risk were observed in the female subjects. Both high and low levels of whole-body fat-free mass, particularly in the arm and trunk, were associated with an increased risk of liver cancer.ConclusionThis study found a gender-specific association between body composition and liver cancer risk and provided evidence for individualized weight management for the prevention of liver cancer.

Objectives: Maternal smoking causes fetal underdevelopment and results in births which are small for gestation age due to intrauterine undernutrition, leading to various metabolic disorders in adulthood. Furthermore, postnatal high fat diet (HFD) consumption is also a potent obesogenic factor, which can interact with maternal smoking. In this study, we aimed to determine whether maternal HFD consumption during pregnancy can reverse the adverse impact of maternal smoking and change the response to postnatal HFD consumption.Methods: Female mice were exposed to cigarette smoke (SE, 2 cigarettes/day) or sham exposed for 5 weeks before mating, with half of the SE dams fed HFD (43% fat, SE+HFD). The same treatment continued throughout gestation and lactation. Male offspring from each maternal group were fed the same HFD or chow after weaning and sacrificed at 13 weeks.Results: Maternal SE alone increased body weight and fat mass in HFD-fed offspring, while SE+HFD offspring showed the highest energy intake and glucose metabolic disorder in adulthood. In addition, postnatal HFD increased the body weight and aggravated the metabolic disorder caused by maternal SE and SE+HFD.Conclusions: Maternal HFD consumption could not ameliorate the adverse effect of maternal SE but exaggerate metabolic disorders in adult offspring. Smoking cessation and a healthy diet are needed during pregnancy to optimize the health outcome in the offspring.