Search

ObjectivesThe antitumor activity of nivolumab plus regorafenib in colorectal cancer from a phase Ib REGONIVO study is encouraging. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib or fruquintinib plus sintilimab as third-line or above therapy in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer.MethodsPatients with MSS metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed from prior treatment and received regorafenib or fruquintinib plus sintilimab as third-line or above therapy from January 2019 to December 2020 were prospectively analyzed based on real-world clinical practice. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.Results42 patients received regorafenib plus sintilimab(RS), and the other 30 patients received fruquintinib plus sintilimab(FS). In the general population, the ORR and DCR were 13.9% and 70.8%, and the median PFS and OS was 4.2(95% CI=2.9-5.5) and 10.5 (95% CI=8.6-12.4) months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between RS and FS group in PFS (3.5(2.2-4.8) vs. 5.5(3.5-7.5) months, P=0.434) and OS (11.0(7.0-15.0) vs. 10.5(3.8-17.2) months, P=0.486). Subgroup analysis suggested that patients without liver metastasis responded well to this combination regimen (ORR: 21.4% vs. 9.1%) and obtained better OS (26(8.8-43.2) vs. 10.0(7.4-12.6) months, P=0.016). The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) was 15.3% and the toxicities were generally tolerable and manageable.ConclusionsRegorafenib or fruquintinib plus sintilimab as third-line or above therapy provide a feasible treatment regimen for MSS metastatic colorectal cancer with tolerated toxicity. Patients without liver metastasis may be the preferred population for this combination regimen.

BackgroundThe present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as third-line or above therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.MethodsPatients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who have failed from second-line treatment and treated with anlotinib monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy or immunotherapy from June 2019 to January 2021 in 3 institutions across China were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.Results43 patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who have failed prior treatment received anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy as third-line or above therapy. In the general population, 4 patients achieved PR, 21 patients had SD and 18 patients had PD. The overall ORR and DCR were 9.3% (4/43) and 58.1% (25/43), respectively. Median PFS and OS were 3.0 months (95% CI=2.5-3.5) and 6.0 months (95% CI=4.4-7.6), respectively. The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events(AEs) was 34.9%. Subgroup analysis suggested that the ORR of anlotinib combination therapy was superior than anlotinib monotherapy, but with similar PFS and OS. The clinical benefit of anlotinib was not associated with previously anti-angiogenesis therapy with apatinib.ConclusionsAnlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy provide a feasible third-line or above therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer a median PFS of 3.0 months and median OS of 6.0 months was obtained with well tolerated toxicity.

BackgroundUnresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients have a poor prognosis. PD-1 monotherapy regimen and PD-1 combined chemotherapy regimen have become the standard third- and first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, respectively. However, the status of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer has not been established. The combination of chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 antibody has been demonstrated to have a synergistic effect. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel in the second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC)/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer patients.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced GC/GEJ cancer that progressed after first-line systemic therapies with sintilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel from April 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.ResultsThirty-nine patients were enrolled and eligible for response assessment. Complete response (CR) was not observed, 15 patients achieved partial response (PR), 16 patients had stable disease (SD) and 9 patients had progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 15 (38.5%) and 31 (79.5%), respectively. Median PFS was 5.4 months (95%CI: 3.072-7.728). PFSs between different subgroups were analyzed. The results showed that gender, age, Human epidermal growth factor receptors 2 (HER2) status, PD-L1 expression, primary tumor site and chemotherapy cycles had no significant effect on PFS. Most of the adverse events (AEs) were of grade 1-2 and manageable. The common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 included anemia (12.8%), neutropenia (12.8%), leukopenia (10.3%), hand-foot syndrome (7.7%), thrombocytopenia (7.7%). The potential immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were grade 1 pneumonia (1 pts [2.6%]) and grade 4 hepatitis (1 pts [2.6%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.ConclusionThese results indicate that sintilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel exhibits good anti-tumor activity and an acceptable safety profile as a second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. These results warrant further investigation and evaluation to identify patients who can benefit more from the combined treatment strategy.

Desmoid tumor is a rare disease, which is histologically characterized by local invasion, monoclonality, and fibroblast proliferation; and clinically characterized by a variable and often unpredictable course. The treatment of desmoid tumor is mainly surgical resection, but the recurrence rate is high. In recent years, a variety of treatment methods, including endocrine therapy, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, targeted drugs, interferon and more, have been used and achieved certain curative effects. In addition, in view of the inertia characteristics of desmoid tumor, observation is also a first-line scheme recommended by multiple guidelines. In the past, the research progress of targeted therapy for desmoid tumor is relatively slow and the curative effect is limited. Thus, targeted therapy is usually used as a remedial treatment after the failure of other conventional treatment methods. However, in recent years, with the rapid progress in the basic research of targeted therapy, some new targeted drugs are increasingly used for the clinical treatment of desmoid tumor and have achieved good results. Herein, we described a patient with aggressive fibromatosis in the abdominal cavity. Following a combined treatment using anlotinib and celecoxib, the patient achieved a partial response with mild toxicity. Simultaneously, the patient’s pain symptoms completely disappeared. This case indicates that the combination of anlotinib and NSAIDs could be an effective treatment for desmoid tumor.

BackgroundThe present study was conducted to analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of sintilimab as second-line or above therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.MethodsPatients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer that progressed after prior systemic therapies and treated with sintilimab from March 2019 to July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsFifty-two patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer received sintilimab monotherapy or combination therapy after they failed from prior systemic therapies. Eight patients achieved partial response (PR), 26 patients had stable disease (SD), and 18 patients had progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 15.4% (8/52) and 65.4% (34/52), respectively. Median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI = 2.0–3.0), and median OS was 5.8 months (95% CI = 4.9–6.7). The ORR and DCR were 30.0% (6/20) and 80.0% (16/20), respectively, in intestinal subtype, which were superior than in non-intestinal subtype (ORR: 6.3%, DCR: 56.3%). Patients with intestinal subtype obtained longer PFS (4.0 vs. 1.9) and OS (9.0 vs. 4.1) than those with non-intestinal subtype. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events was 44.2%.ConclusionsSintilimab monotherapy or combination therapy provides a feasible therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who failed from prior systemic therapies. The efficacy of sintilimab in intestinal subtype was superior than that in non-intestinal subtype.

The prognosis of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma is dismal. Platinum-based chemotherapy is still the main first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma, while immunotherapy can be used as a first-line treatment option for people who cannot tolerate platinum. Immunotherapy is preferred in the second-line treatment of bladder urothelial carcinoma. PD-1 inhibitors (Pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab) and PD-L1 inhibitors (Ddurvalumab and avelumab) have not been approved for the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer in China. We describe a patient with advanced urothelial carcinoma experienced disease progression after gemcitabine chemotherapy. Following a treatment of domestic PD-1 inhibitor (sintilimab), the patient achieved a durable complete response with mild toxicity. This case indicates that PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab might be a second-line treatment choice for advanced urothelial carcinoma.

BackgroundPD-L1 and HER-2 are routine biomarkers for gastric cancer (GC). However, little research has been done to investigate the correlation among PD-L1, HER-2, immune microenvironment, and clinical features in GC.MethodsBetween January 2013 and May 2020, a total of 120 GC patients treated with chemotherapy were admitted to Henan Tumor Hospital. We retrospectively identified PD-L1, HER-2 level before chemotherapy and abstracted clinicopathologic features and treatment outcomes. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to assess the relationship between PD-L1/HER-2 levels and progression-free survival (PFS). The mRNA and tumor microenvironment of 343 patients with GC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used to explore the underlying mechanism.ResultsWe retrospectively analyzed 120 patients with gastric cancer, including 17 patients with HER-2 positive and 103 patients with HER-2 negative GC. The results showed that the expression of PD-L1 was closely correlated with HER-2 (P = 0.015). Patients with PD-L1/HER-2 positive obtained lower PFS compared to PD-L1/HER-2 negative (mPFS: 6.4 vs. 11.1 months, P = 0.014, mPFS: 5.3 vs. 11.1 months, P = 0.002, respectively), and the PD-L1 negative and HER-2 negative had the best PFS than other groups (P = 0.0008). In a multivariate model, PD-L1 status, HER-2 status, tumor location, and tumor differentiation remained independent prognostic indicators for PFS (P < 0.05). The results of database further analysis showed that the proportion of PD-L1+/CD8A+ in HER-2 negative patients was higher than that in HER-2 positive patients (37.6 vs 20.3%), while PD-L1−/CD8A− was significantly higher in HER-2 positive patients than HER-2 negative patients (57.8 vs. 28.8%). In addition, it showed that not only CD4+T cells, macrophages, and CD8+T cells, but also the associated inflammatory pathways such as IFN-γ/STAT1 were associated with HER-2.ConclusionHER-2 status could predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and HER-2 status combined with PD-L1 level could predict the prognosis of GC patients.

Kremen2 (Krm2) plays an important role in embryonic development, bone formation, and tumorigenesis as a crucial regulator of classical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. However, the role of Krm2 in gastric cancer is not clear. The aim of this study was to explore the regulatory role of Krm2 in the tumorigenesis and metastasis of gastric cancer. It was demonstrated that, compared to para-cancerous tissues, Krm2 was significantly up-regulated in gastric cancer tissues and was positively correlated with the pathological grade of gastric cancer patients. Given that Krm2 is abundantly expressed in most tested gastric cancer cell lines, Krm2 knockdown cell models were established and further used to construct mice xenograft model. After knocking down Krm2, both the cell survival in vitro and tumorigenesis in vivo of gastric cancer cells were inhibited. At the same time, knockdown of Krm2 induced apoptosis, cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase and repression of migration in gastric cancer cells in vitro. Mechanistically, we found that knockdown of Krm2 suppressed PI3K/Akt pathway. Therefore, we revealed the novel role and the molecular mechanism of Krm2 in promoting the tumorigenesis and metastasis in gastric cancer. Krm2 can be a potent candidate for designing of targeted therapy.

Objectives: The antitumor activity of nivolumab plus regorafenib in colorectal cancer from a phase Ib REGONIVO study is encouraging. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib or fruquintinib plus sintilimab as third-line or above therapy in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients with MSS metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed from prior treatment and received regorafenib or fruquintinib plus sintilimab as thirdline or above therapy from January 2019 to December 2020 were prospectively analyzed based on real-world clinical practice. The primary end point was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: 42 patients received regorafenib plus sintilimab(RS), and the other 30 patients received fruquintinib plus sintilimab(FS). In the general population, the ORR and DCR were 13.9% and 70.8%, and the median PFS and OS was 4.2(95% CI=2.9-5.5) and 10.5 (95% CI=8.6-12.4) months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between RS and FS group in PFS (3.5(2.2-4.8) vs. 5.5(3.5-7.5) months, P=0.434) and OS (11.0(7.0-15.0) vs. 10.5(3.8-17.2) months, P=0.486). Subgroup analysis suggested that patients without liver metastasis responded well to this combination regimen (ORR: 21.4% vs. 9.1%) and obtained better OS (26(8.8-43.2) vs. 10.0(7.4-12.6) months, P=0.016). The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) was 15.3% and the toxicities were generally tolerable and manageable. Conclusions: Regorafenib or fruquintinib plus sintilimab as third-line or above therapy provide a feasible treatment regimen for MSS metastatic colorectal cancer with tolerated toxicity. Patients without liver metastasis may be the preferred population for this combination regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]