Search

This article presents a study on the development and validation of an ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram for predicting HER2-low expression breast cancer. The study included 222 patients with breast cancer, and machine learning methods were used to extract radiomics features from ultrasound images. The features were then used to construct a prediction model, which was validated using a training cohort and a test cohort. The nomogram, incorporating radiomics features and clinical risk factors, showed high prediction value for HER2-low expression breast cancer. This non-invasive approach could be useful for early detection and clinical therapy planning. [Extracted from the article]

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecologic malignancies with increasing morbidity. The prognosis for patients diagnosed with early-stage EC remains favorable; however, for patients with recurrent or metastatic EC, the prognosis is poor and treatment options, until recently, are limited. Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) represent innovative strategies in cancer treatment; however, there are less investigations regarding their efficacy in EC. This report describes an EC case with low human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression score (IHC 2+) that experienced recurrent metastasis in the abdominal and peritoneal following post-surgical chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Subsequently, the commencement of HER2- targeted ADC, disitamab vedotin (RC48; 2.5 mg/kg), administered intravenously every two weeks, was initiated. The tumor lesions shrunk markedly after three cycles of treatment and disappeared by the completion of ten cycles of therapy. The patient is still in remission at present. The current findings imply the potential efficacy of HER2-targeted ADCs for patients with HER2-low metastatic EC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) is currently the standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+), and HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. However, the impact of HER2 status on the prognosis of patients receiving CDK4/6i and ET remains unclear. The meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate different outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients in advanced HR+ breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i and ET. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE databases for relevant published literature. Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled by fixed or random effects models. Results: Overall, 12 studies with 3567 patients were eligible for analysis. The pooled analysis suggested that no significant differences were observed in terms of ORR and OS between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients who underwent CDK4/6i and ET. Similarly, no significant difference in PFS was found between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients who underwent post-line CDK4/6i and ET or first-line Palbociclib and ET. However, in patients who received mixed-line (not a single treatment line) or first-line CDK4/6i and ET, the PFS was significantly shorter in the HER2-low subgroup than in the HER2-zero subgroup (mixed-line: HR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.11–1.65; P = 0.002; first-line: HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.01– 1.28; P = 0.04). A similar phenomenon was observed in patients who received mixed-line or post-line Palbociclib and ET (mixed-line: HR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.09–2.34; P = 0.02; post-line: HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.03–2.00; P = 0.03). Conclusion: These results indicated that HER2-low status did not have a significant association with ORR and OS, but it may have a worse impact on PFS in patients who received mixed-line or first-line CDK4/6i and ET, as well as mixed-line or post-line palbociclib plus ET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the utility of radiomic features from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in distinguishing HER2-low from HER2-zero breast cancer. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 118 MRI cases, including 78 HER2-low and 40 HER2-zero patients confirmed by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization. From each DCE-MRI case, 960 radiomic features were extracted. These features were screened and reduced using intraclass correlation coefficient, Mann-Whitney U test, and least absolute shrinkage to establish rad-scores. Logistic regression (LR) assessed the model's effectiveness in distinguishing HER2-low from HER2-zero. A clinicopathological MRI characteristic model was constructed using univariate and multivariate analysis, and a nomogram was developed combining rad-scores with significant MRI characteristics. Model performancewas evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and clinical benefit was assessed with decision curve analysis. Results: The radiomics model, clinical model, and nomogram successfully distinguished between HER2-low and HER2-zero. The radiomics model showed excellent performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.875 in the training set and 0.845 in the test set, outperforming the clinical model (AUC = 0.691 and 0.672, respectively). HER2 status correlated with increased rad-score and Time Intensity Curve (TIC). The nomogram outperformed both models, with AUC, sensitivity, and specificity values of 0.892, 79.6%, and 82.8% in the training set, and 0.886, 83.3%, and 90.9% in the test set. Conclusions: The DCE-MRI-based nomogram shows promising potential in differentiating HER2-low from HER2-zero status in breast cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are more likely to occur in younger patients and have a poor prognosis. They are highly heterogeneous tumors consisting of different molecular subtypes. The only common characteristic among them is the absence of targets for endocrine therapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade. In the past two decades, there has been an increased understanding of these tumors from a molecular perspective, leading to their stratification according to new therapeutic strategies. TNBC has ushered breast carcinomas into the era of immunotherapy. The higher frequency of germline BRCA mutations in these tumors enables targeting this repair defect by drugs like PARP inhibitors, resulting in synthetic lethality in neoplastic cells. Additionally, we have the identification of new molecules to which this generation of smart drugs, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), are directed. In this review, we will discuss the trajectory of this knowledge in a systematic manner, presenting the molecular bases, therapeutic possibilities, and biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveHER2 status in breast cancer is an essential parameter in individual therapeutic decision-making and is routinely assessed in primary tumors in accordance with international recommendations. Reports of HER2 heterogeneity raise the question of basing treatment decisions on HER2 status in metastases, if present. We investigated the degree and clinical implications of HER2 heterogeneity in lymph node–positive breast cancer. Because of recent recognition of therapeutic opportunities in this group of tumors, we especially focused on cases involving low-level HER2 expression.MethodsThe HER2 status of primary tumors and of corresponding lymph node metastases was determined in archived material at the protein and gene levels using the gene– protein assay and interpreted in accordance with 2018 ASCO/CAP criteria. HER2-low status was defined as protein expression levels 1+ or 2+ with negative amplification status.ResultsWe analyzed a series of 43 cases of primary infiltrating breast cancer, each with at least two axillary nodes harboring macrometastases (>2 mm), in total 206 such nodes. In 7% of cases, we detected intertumoral HER2 heterogeneity. Three of nine HER2-positive primary tumors were associated with HER2-negative metastases. No cases with HER2-negative primary tumors had HER2-positive metastases, but 55% (6/11) of HER2 0 primary tumors had HER2 1+ and/or 2+ metastases, and 19% (3/16) HER2 1+ cases had exclusively HER2 0 metastases. All metastases in HER2 2+ cases showed HER2-low protein expression levels. Internodal HER2 heterogeneity at low protein expression levels (presence of HER2 0, HER2 1+, and/or HER2 2+ metastatic deposits within the same axilla) was seen in 40% (17/43) of cases. We found no statistically significant association between HER2 heterogeneity and other tumor-related parameters. Survival data indicated worse outcomes in the HER2-low group compared with the rest of the cohort.ConclusionOur results indicate a substantial instability of HER2 protein expression, leading to considerable intertumoral and internodal HER2 heterogeneity in lymph node–positive breast carcinomas. This heterogeneity is particularly relevant in HER2-low tumors in which the corrective effects of HER2 gene copy number analysis definitionally is absent. Our findings suggest that determining HER2 status in metastatic lymph nodes may generate relevant information for therapeutic decision-making.

Background: Owing to the emergence of drugs targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), remarkable prognostic enhancement has been seen for patients with HER2-positive breast carcinoma. However, anti-HER2 medicines are applicable merely to individuals with HER2-positive tumors, and the benefit for those with low HER2 expression is unclear. The DESTINYBreast04 phase III and RC48 clinical trial results showed the benefit of antibody-drug couples for low HER2-expressing individuals with breast carcinoma, challenging the traditional dichotomy between HER2-negative and -positive tumors. Hence, the purposes of the present work are to explore the clinicopathological traits and prognostic differences in the HER2-low expression Chinese population with early-stage breast carcinoma. Methods: Data from the database of the Breast Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University were collected from January 2008 to December 2017. We screened a total of 4,598 patients, of which 2,837 had HER2-0 tumors and 1,761 had HER2-low tumors. Additionally, clinicopathological characteristics, survival, and prognostic information were obtained. Difference comparisons were made between HER2-0 and HER2-low groups regarding the clinical traits and outcomes. Results: We enrolled 4598 patients, with the HR-positive subjects suffering from HER2-low breast carcinoma higher in proportion than the HR-negative patients. In contrast to HER2-0 tumors, the HER2-low tumors were linked to an older median age at diagnosis, T1 tumors, N1 stage, a higher Ki-67 index, as well as inferior histological grade. Insignificant inter-group difference was noted regarding overall survival (OS), although the HER2-0 group exhibited better disease-free survival (DFS) than the HER2-low group for the entire (P = 0.003), lymph node-negative (P = 0.009) and HR-positive (P = 0.007) populations. According to the multivariate regression finding, low HER2 expression was an inferior DFS prognostic factor in the HER2-negative population with early-stage breast cancer (HR, 1.33;95% CI, 1.06-1.66; P = 0.013). Conclusion: The clinical traits of the HER2-low carcinomas differed from those of HER2-0 tumors. Despite the insignificant inter-group difference in OS, the differences in DFS were found for the overall, lymph node-negative and HRpositive subjects, suggesting the possibility of HER2-low as an inferior prognostic factor for disease progression in early-stage breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is negative for hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). In stage I TNBC, adjuvant therapy or follow-up are performed according to risk factors, but clinical trial data is scarce. In recent years, it has been reported that HER2-low cases (1+/2+ and in situ hybridization negative) have different prognoses than HER2-0 cases. However, the risk of recurrence and risk factors in this HER2-low population for stage I TNBC have not yet been investigated. Methods: Herein, out of 174 patients with TNBC who underwent surgery from June 2004 to December 2009 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo), we retrospectively examined 42 cases diagnosed as T1N0M0 TNBC after excluding those treated with preoperative chemotherapy. Results: All patients were female, the median age was 60.5 years, and 11 cases were HER2-low and 31 cases were HER2-0. The median follow-up period was 121 months. Postoperative adjuvant therapy was administered in 30 patients and recurrence occurred in 8 patients. HER2-low cases showed a significantly shorter disease-free survival (HR: 7.0; 95% CI: 1.2-40.2; P=0.0016) and a trend towards shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-31.4) compared with that of HER2-0 cases. HER2 was also identified as a factor for poor prognosis from the point-estimated values in univariate and multivariate analyses after confirming that there was no correlation between the other factors. Conclusion: For patients with stage I TNBC, the HER2-low population had a significantly worse prognosis than the HER2-0 population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherent issues of subjectivity and inconsistency have long plagued immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based Her2 assessment, leading to the repeated issuance of guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) for its standardization for breast cancer patients. Yet, all these efforts may prove insufficient with the advent of Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd), a drug with the promise to expand to tumors traditionally defined as Her2 negative (Her2-). In this study, we attempted to address these issues by exploring an ELISA-like quantitative dot blot (QDB) method as an alternative to IHC. The QDB method has been used to measure multiple protein biomarkers including ER, PR, Ki67, and cyclin D1 in breast cancer specimens. Using an independent cohort (cohort 2) of breast cancer formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens, we validated cutoffs developed in cohort 1 (Yu et al., Scientific Reports 2020 10:10502) with overall 100% specificity (95% CI: 100-100) and 97.56% sensitivity (95% CI: 92.68-100) in cohort 2 against standard practice with the dichotomized absolutely quantitated values. Using the limit of detection (LOD) of the QDB method as the putative cutoff point, tumors with no Her2 expression were identified with the number comparable to those of IHC 0. Our results support further evaluation of the QDB method as an alternative to IHC to meet the emerging need of identifying tumors with low Her2 expression (Her2-low) in daily clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HER2-low expression breast cancer (BC) accounts for approximately 45%-55% of all BC cases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic difference between patients with HER2-low expression and HER2- zero BC. Methods: An electronic search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was performed to screen studies that included prognostic comparisons between HER2-zero and HER2-low expression groups. A total of 14 studies involving 52106 patients were included. Results: Our results indicated that HER2-low expression was associated with a significant benefit in OS among all patients with early BC (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.88), patients with hormone-receptor positive BC (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89), and patients with TNBC (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87). HER2-low expression was associated with a significant benefit in DFS among all patients (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.93), patients with hormone receptor-positive BC (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90), but no significant difference in DFS was found in patients with TNBC (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.17). HER2-low expression was associated with a significant benefit in RFS among all patients (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95), patients with hormone receptor-positive BC (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96), but no significant difference in RFS was found in patients with TNBC (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.55-1.16). Conclusions: Among patients with early-stage BC, patients with HER2-low expression BC had better OS in the overall population, hormone receptor-positive and TNBC subgroups. Besides, favorable DFS and RFS were observed in both the overall population and hormone receptor-positive subgroup. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier (CRD 42022349458). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundTo characterize the clinicopathological features and evaluate the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) efficacy of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer.MethodsA total of 905 breast cancer patients who received 4 cycles of thrice-weekly standard NACT in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were retrospectively enrolled, including 685 cases with HER2-low expression and 220 cases with HER2-negative expression. Clinicopathological features were compared between patients with HER2-negative and HER2-low expression. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to find the independent factors of achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after NACT.ResultsThere were significant differences in stage_N (P = 0.014), histological grade (P = 0.001), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P < 0.001), progesterone receptor (PgR) status (P < 0.001), NACT regimens (P = 0.032) and NACT efficacy (P = 0.037) between patients with HER2-negative and HER2-low expression breast cancer. In subgroup analysis, histological grade (P = 0.032), ER (P = 0.002), Ki-67 (P < 0.001) and HER2 status (P = 0.025) were independent predictors of achieving a pCR in ER-positive breast cancer. And the nomogram for pCR in ER-positive breast cancer showed great discriminatory ability with an AUC of 0.795. The calibration curve also showed that the predictive ability of the nomogram was a good fit to actual observations. Then, in the analysis of ER-negative breast cancer, only stage_N (P = 0.001) and Ki-67 (P = 0.018) were independent influencing factors of achieving a pCR in ER-negative breast cancer.ConclusionHER2-low breast cancer was a different disease from HER2-negative breast cancer in clinicopathological features. Moreover, the NACT efficacy of HER2-low breast cancer patients was poorer.

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an important biomarker that plays a pivotal role in therapeutic decision-making for patients with breast cancer (BC). Patients with HER2-low BC can benefit from new HER2 targeted therapy. For ensuring the accurate and reproducible detection of HER2-low cancer, reliable reference materials are required for monitoring the sensitivity and specificity of detection assays. Herein, a lentiviral vector was used to transduce the HER2 gene into MDAMB- 231 cells that exhibited low HER2 density, and the cells were characterized by droplet digital PCR to accurately determine the copy number variation. Then, the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from xenografts were prepared and evaluated for suitability as candidate reference materials by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The FFPE reference materials were selected on the basis of IHC score of 2+ and negative FISH result to meet the requirement for HER2-low BC detection. Furthermore, the FFPE reference materials exhibited typical histological structures that resembled the clinical BC specimens. These novel FFPE reference materials displayed the high stability and homogeneity, and they were produced in high quantity. In summary, we generated high-quality reference materials for internal quality control and proficiency testing in HER2-low detection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer, which is defined as HER2 1+ or 2+ in immunohistochemistry without gene amplification, accounts for a considerable part of all breast cancers. However, it remains controversial whether HER2-low breast cancer is a distinct entity. Our aim was to compare the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between HER2-zero and HER2-low early breast cancer. Methods: The study was a retrospective analysis that enrolled 1,039 patients with available HER2 expression data in a single institute from 2013 to 2014, of whom 262 HER2-positive patients were excluded from the subsequent analysis. The remaining patients were divided into HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. Each group was further categorized into a hormone receptor (HR)-positive and an HR-negative subgroup. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected and compared between HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), which were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test, landmark analysis, and Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 777 non-HER2-positive patients were included in this analysis, of whom 126, 552, 53, and 46 patients were HR-positive/HER2-zero, HR-positive/HER2-low, HR-negative/HER2-zero, and HR-negative/HER2-low, respectively. No significant difference in DFS and OS was detected between the HER2-zero group and the HER2-low group when paired by HR status. Landmark analysis with a time point set at 5 years indicated that HR-positive/HER2-low patients had a better DFS compared with HR-positive/HER2-zero patients after 5 years (p = 0.0047). HER2-low status was an independent prognostic factor for DFS after 5 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13–0.75, p = 0.01]. Conclusion: The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer were similar regardless of HR status. Patients with HR-positive/HER2-low tumors tended to have a better DFS than their HR-positive/HER2-zero counterparts after 5 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundHuman epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer, which is defined as HER2 1+ or 2+ in immunohistochemistry without gene amplification, accounts for a considerable part of all breast cancers. However, it remains controversial whether HER2-low breast cancer is a distinct entity. Our aim was to compare the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between HER2-zero and HER2-low early breast cancer.MethodsThe study was a retrospective analysis that enrolled 1,039 patients with available HER2 expression data in a single institute from 2013 to 2014, of whom 262 HER2-positive patients were excluded from the subsequent analysis. The remaining patients were divided into HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. Each group was further categorized into a hormone receptor (HR)-positive and an HR-negative subgroup. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected and compared between HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), which were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test, landmark analysis, and Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsA total of 777 non-HER2-positive patients were included in this analysis, of whom 126, 552, 53, and 46 patients were HR-positive/HER2-zero, HR-positive/HER2-low, HR-negative/HER2-zero, and HR-negative/HER2-low, respectively. No significant difference in DFS and OS was detected between the HER2-zero group and the HER2-low group when paired by HR status. Landmark analysis with a time point set at 5 years indicated that HR-positive/HER2-low patients had a better DFS compared with HR-positive/HER2-zero patients after 5 years (p = 0.0047). HER2-low status was an independent prognostic factor for DFS after 5 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13–0.75, p = 0.01].ConclusionThe clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer were similar regardless of HR status. Patients with HR-positive/HER2-low tumors tended to have a better DFS than their HR-positive/HER2-zero counterparts after 5 years.

BackgroundTo characterize the clinical and pathological features and survival of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer in China.MethodsThe China National Cancer Center database was used to identify 1,433 metastatic breast cancer patients with HER2-negative disease diagnosed between 2005 and 2015. Clinicopathological features, survival, and prognosis information were extracted. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors associated with OS were analyzed using Cox regression model with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).ResultsThere were 618 (43.1%) and 815 (56.9%) HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors out of 1,433 tumors, respectively. The proportion of hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors was significantly higher in HER2-low tumors than in those with HER2-zero tumors (77.8% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.001). Patients with HER2-low tumors survived significantly longer than those with HER2-zero tumors in the overall population (48.5 months vs. 43.0 months, p = 0.004) and HR-positive subgroup (54.9 months vs. 48.1 months, p = 0.011), but not in the HR-negative subgroup (29.5 months vs. 29.9 months, p = 0.718). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that HER2-low tumors were independently associated with increased OS in HER2-negative population (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73–0.98, p = 0.026).ConclusionOur findings demonstrate that HER2-low tumors could be identified as a more distinct clinical entity from HER2-zero tumors, especially for the HR-positive subgroup. A more complex molecular landscape of HER2-low breast cancer might exist, and more precise diagnostic algorithms for HER2 testing could be investigated, thus offering new therapeutic targets for breast cancer treatment.

Background: To characterize the clinical and pathological features and survival of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer in China. Methods: The China National Cancer Center database was used to identify 1,433 metastatic breast cancer patients with HER2-negative disease diagnosed between 2005 and 2015. Clinicopathological features, survival, and prognosis information were extracted. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors associated with OS were analyzed using Cox regression model with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: There were 618 (43.1%) and 815 (56.9%) HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors out of 1,433 tumors, respectively. The proportion of hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors was significantly higher in HER2-low tumors than in those with HER2-zero tumors (77.8% vs. 69.2%, p < 0.001). Patients with HER2-low tumors survived significantly longer than those with HER2-zero tumors in the overall population (48.5 months vs. 43.0 months, p = 0.004) and HR-positive subgroup (54.9 months vs. 48.1 months, p = 0.011), but not in the HR-negative subgroup (29.5 months vs. 29.9 months, p = 0.718). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that HER2-low tumors were independently associated with increased OS in HER2-negative population (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73–0.98, p = 0.026). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that HER2-low tumors could be identified as a more distinct clinical entity from HER2-zero tumors, especially for the HR-positive subgroup. A more complex molecular landscape of HER2-low breast cancer might exist, and more precise diagnostic algorithms for HER2 testing could be investigated, thus offering new therapeutic targets for breast cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are more likely to occur in younger patients and have a poor prognosis. They are highly heterogeneous tumors consisting of different molecular subtypes. The only common characteristic among them is the absence of targets for endocrine therapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade. In the past two decades, there has been an increased understanding of these tumors from a molecular perspective, leading to their stratification according to new therapeutic strategies. TNBC has ushered breast carcinomas into the era of immunotherapy. The higher frequency of germline BRCA mutations in these tumors enables targeting this repair defect by drugs like PARP inhibitors, resulting in synthetic lethality in neoplastic cells. Additionally, we have the identification of new molecules to which this generation of smart drugs, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), are directed. In this review, we will discuss the trajectory of this knowledge in a systematic manner, presenting the molecular bases, therapeutic possibilities, and biomarkers., Competing Interests: The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Carvalho.)