Search

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to produce a favorable prognosis for patients with resectable mucosal melanoma (MM), resulting in the need for stratification to optimally select patients to benefit from adjuvant therapy. This study analyzed Ki67 as a potential stratification index for adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable MM.MethodsPatients with resected MM who received subsequent adjuvant therapy in Beijing Cancer Hospital between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) curves were used to perform the survival comparisons across different subgroups.ResultsFrom Jan 2010 to Dec 2018, 1106 MM patients were screened from a database of 4706 patients and 175 of these patients were finally enrolled. A total of 100 patients received temozolomide (TMZ)-based adjuvant chemotherapy and 75 patients received high-dose interferon-α2b (HDI) adjuvant therapy. Compared with HDI, patients who received TMZ-based adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly superior RFS (21.0 vs. 9.6 months, P = 0.002). For patients with low Ki67 expression (

ObjectivesTo examine the long-term survival outcome of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in Chinese patients with unresectable or metastatic acral/cutaneous melanoma with BRAF-V600 mutation and to explore potential predictors of effectiveness.MethodsThis was a long-term follow-up of Chinese patients with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600-mutant acral/cutaneous melanoma administered dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase IIa study (NCT02083354). Efficacy endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The impacts of baseline characteristics on PFS and OS were analyzed.ResultsA total of sixty patients were included. The median age was 48 years, and 24 patients (40.0%) were male. Totally 12 individuals (20.0%) had acral melanoma, and 45 (75.0%) had failed previous systemic therapy. Up to July 2020, the median duration of follow-up was 37.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 29.1-44.9) months. The updated ORR was 71.7% (95%CI 60.3%-83.1%). The 3-year OS rate was 28.8% (95%CI 19.1-43.6%) in the overall population, and 35.7% (95%CI 15.5–82.4%) in acral melanoma patients. The median DOR was 7.5 months (95%CI 4.5 to 10.5). Baseline normal lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), metastatic organ sites

Background: The best response and survival outcomes between advanced melanoma patients treated with the anti-PD-1 monotherapy vary greatly, rendering a risk model in need to optimally stratify patients based on their likelihood to benefit from the said treatment.Methods: We performed an ad hoc analysis of 89 advanced melanoma patients treated with the anti-PD-1 monotherapy from two prospective clinical trials at the Peking University Cancer Hospital from April 2016 to May 2018. Clinicodemographical characteristics, baseline and early-on-treatment (median 0.6 months after anti-PD-1 monotherapy initiation) routine laboratory variables, including complete blood count and general chemistry, and best response/survival data were extracted and analyzed in both univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazard models.Results: After three rounds of screening, risk factors associated with a poorer PFS included a high pre-treatment neutrophil, derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), low pre-treatment hemoglobin, and low early-on-/pre-treatment fold change of eosinophil; those with a poorer OS included a high pre-treatment neutrophil, eosinophil, PLT, early-on/pre-treatment fold change of LDH and neutrophil; and those with a poorer best response included a high pre-treatment NLR and early-on-/pre-treatment LDH fold change. Risk models (scale: low, median-low, median high, and high risk) were established based on these risk factors as dichotomous variables and M stage (with vs. without distant metastasis) for PFS (HR 1.976, 95% CI, 1.507–2.592, P < 0.001), OS (HR 2.348, 95% CI, 1.688–3.266), and non-responder (OR 3.586, 95% CI, 1.668–7.713, P = 0.001), respectively. For patients with low, median-low, median-high, and high risks of developing disease progression (PD), six-month PFS rates were 64.3% (95% CI, 43.5–95.0%), 37.5% (95% CI, 22.4–62.9%), 9.1% (95% CI, 3.1–26.7%), and 0%, respectively. For patients with OS risks of low, median-low, median-high, and high, OS rates at 12 months were 82.5% (95% CI, 63.1–100%), 76.6% (95% CI, 58.4–100%), 42.1% (95% CI, 26.3–67.3%), and 23.9% (95% CI, 11.1–51.3%), respectively. For patients with risks of low, median-low, median-high, and high of being a non-responder, objective response rates were 50.0% (95% CI, 15.7–84.3%), 27.8% (95% CI, 9.7–53.5%), 10.3% (95% CI, 2.9–24.2%), and 0%, respectively.Conclusion: A risk scoring model based on the clinicodemographical characteristics and easily obtainable routinely tested laboratory biomarkers may facilitate the best response and survival outcome prediction and personalized therapeutic decision making for the anti-PD-1 monotherapy treated advanced melanoma patients in Asia.

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody therapy is becoming a standard treatment for advanced melanoma that produces durable responses and prolonged survival, but the prognosis of patients with liver metastases is still unsatisfactory. Here, we analyzed five clinical studies (second-line or later, JS001-I-PK, CT4, KN151, BGB-A317-102, and SHR-1210-102; performed between 2015 and 2018) of anti-PD-1 monotherapy for advanced melanoma to explore prognostic variables for patients with liver metastases. A total of 168 patients with stage IV melanoma were included, among which 47 had liver metastasis and 121 did not. The objective response rate (ORR) of the no liver metastasis group was significantly higher than that of the liver metastasis group (20.7 vs. 4.3%, P < 0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 3.6 months for the patients with liver metastasis and 7.4 months for those without liver metastasis (P < 0.05). The no liver metastasis group also had a longer median overall survival (OS) time than the liver metastasis group (22.8 vs. 15.7 months, P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that liver metastasis was negatively associated with PFS. In the liver metastasis group, compared to metastases in other sites (lymph node, subcutaneous, and lung), liver metastases responded worse to anti-PD-1 monotherapy and were most likely to progress. Intrahepatic progression (defined as an increase in liver metastasis by more than 20% from baseline or having new liver metastases, P < 0.05) was negatively associated with OS, which indicates the need to find a more effective therapy that can target liver metastases. Interestingly, with a median PFS and OS time of 6.0 and 30.9 months, respectively, previous oncolytic virotherapy might bring more benefits to patients with liver metastasis, but confirmation is needed because of the limited number of samples. These findings emphasize that liver metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Further exploration is still needed to find a new treatment approach for these patients.