Search

IntroductionPostoperative recurrence and metastasis of gastric cancer (GC) are primary factors that contribute to poor prognosis. GC recurs at a rate of approximately 70%–80% within 2 years after local treatment and approximately 90% within 5 years. “Yang-deficient toxic node” is the core pathogenesis of GC recurrence and metastasis. The Yiqi Wenyang Jiedu prescription (YWJP), a form of complementary and alternative medicine in China, is an empirical remedy to prevent postoperative recurrence and metastasis of GC. Taking the main therapeutic principles of “nourishing Qi and warming Yang, strengthening Zhengqi, and detoxifying” can aid in preventing the recurrence and metastasis of GC in patients during the watchful waiting period after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. This approach aims to enhance the quality of life of patients. However, high-quality evidence to support this hypothesis is lacking. This study will aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of YWJP to prevent and treat postoperative metastasis and GC recurrence.MethodsThe study will be a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-parallel-controlled clinical trial. A total of 212 patients who completed adjuvant chemotherapy within 8 months of radical gastrectomy will be enrolled. Patients in the intervention group will receive the YWJP, whereas those in the control group will receive a placebo. The main outcome was the disease-free survival (DFS) rate 2 years after surgery. The secondary outcomes included DFS time, overall survival, annual cumulative recurrence and rate of metastasis after 1–3 years, cumulative annual survival after 1–3 years, fat distribution-related indicators, tumor markers, peripheral blood inflammatory indicators, prognostic nutritional index, symptoms and quality of life evaluation, medication compliance, and adverse reaction rate.DiscussionThere is a lack of effective therapy after the completion of adjuvant therapy during the postoperative period of watchful waiting. This study will be the first randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether complementary and alternative medical interventions can effectively prevent recurrence and metastasis during the watchful waiting period after GC surgery and to provide evidence for surveillance treatment management after GC surgery.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05229809.

Malignant tumors are complex systemic chronic diseases and one of the major causes of human mortality. Targeted therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy are examples of mainstream allopathic medicine treatments that effective for intermediate and advanced malignant tumors. The ongoing use of conventional allopathic medicine has resulted in adverse responses and drug resistance, which have hampered its efficacy. As an important component of complementary and alternative medicine, Chinese medicine has been found to have antitumor effects and has played an important role in enhancing the therapeutic sensitivity of mainstream allopathic medicine, reducing the incidence of adverse events and improving immune-related functions. The combined application of adjuvant Chinese medicine and mainstream allopathic medicine has begun to gain acceptance and is gradually used in the field of antitumor therapy. Traditional natural medicines and their active ingredients, as well as Chinese patent medicines, have been proven to have excellent therapeutic efficacy and good safety in the treatment of various malignant tumors. This paper focuses on the mechanism of action and research progress of combining the above drugs with mainstream allopathic medicine to increase therapeutic sensitivity, alleviate drug resistance, reduce adverse reactions, and improve the body’s immune function. To encourage the clinical development and use of Chinese herb adjuvant therapy as well as to provide ideas and information for creating safer and more effective anticancer medication combinations, the significant functions of Chinese herb therapies as adjuvant therapies for cancer treatment are described in detail.

BackgroundThe question of whether flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) affects incidence or mortality remains unclear. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to explore this issue.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for cohort studies (CS), case–control studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people who underwent FS and reported mortality or incidence of CRC until 11 December 2022. Relative risk (RR) was applied as an estimate of the effect of interest. To combine the RRs and 95% confidence intervals, a random-effects model was used. The quality of the included studies and evidence was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale, the Jadad scale, and the “Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System.”ResultsThere were a total of six RCTs and one CS, comprising 702,275 individuals. FS was found to be associated with a 26% RR reduction in CRC incidence (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66–0.84) and a 30% RR reduction in CRC mortality (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58–0.85). In the incidence subgroup analysis, FS significantly reduced the incidence of CRC compared with non-screening, usual care, and fecal immunochemical testing. Significance was also shown in men, women, distal site, stages III–IV, ages 55–59, and age over 60. In terms of the mortality subgroup analysis, the results were roughly the same as those of incidence.ConclusionAccording to this study, FS might reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. To confirm this finding, further prospective clinical studies should be conducted based on a larger-scale population.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023388925.