Search

BackgroundIn recent years, studies have confirmed the predictive capability of spectral computer tomography (CT) in determining microvascular invasion (MVI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Discrepancies in the predicted MVI values between conventional CT imaging features and spectral CT parameters necessitate additional validation.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 105 cases of small HCC were reviewed, and participants were divided into MVI-negative (n=53, Male:48 (90.57%); mean age, 59.40 ± 11.79 years) and MVI-positive (n=52, Male:50(96.15%); mean age, 58.74 ± 9.21 years) groups using pathological results. Imaging features and iodine density (ID) obtained from three-phase enhancement spectral CT scans were gathered from all participants. The study evaluated differences in imaging features and ID values of HCC between two groups, assessing their diagnostic accuracy in predicting MVI occurrence in HCC patients. Furthermore, the diagnostic efficacy of imaging features and ID in predicting MVI was compared.ResultsSignificant differences were noted in the presence of mosaic architecture, nodule-in-nodule architecture, and corona enhancement between the groups, all with p-values < 0.001. There were also notable disparities in IDs between the two groups across the arterial phase, portal phase, and delayed phases, all with p-values < 0.001. The imaging features of nodule-in-nodule architecture, corona enhancement, and nonsmooth tumor margin demonstrate significant diagnostic efficacy, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.761, 0.742, and 0.752, respectively. In spectral CT analysis, the arterial, portal, and delayed phase IDs exhibit remarkable diagnostic accuracy in detecting MVI, with AUCs of 0.821, 0.832, and 0.802, respectively. Furthermore, the combined models of imaging features, ID, and imaging features with ID reveal substantial predictive capabilities, with AUCs of 0.846, 0.872, and 0.904, respectively. DeLong test results indicated no statistically significant differences between imaging features and IDs.ConclusionsSubstantial differences were noted in imaging features and ID between the MVI-negative and MVI-positive groups in this study. The ID and imaging features exhibited a robust diagnostic precision in predicting MVI. Additionally, our results suggest that both imaging features and ID showed similar predictive efficacy for MVI.

BackgroundProstate cancer invades the capsule is a key factor in selecting appropriate treatment methods. Accurate preoperative prediction of extraprostatic extension (EPE) can help achieve precise selection of treatment plans.PurposeThe aim of this study is to verify the diagnostic efficacy of tumor size, length of capsular contact (LCC), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and Amide proton transfer (APT) value in predicting EPE. Additionally, the study aims to investigate the potential additional value of APT for predicting EPE.MethodThis study include 47 tumor organ confined patients (age, 64.16 ± 9.18) and 50 EPE patients (age, 61.51 ± 8.82). The difference of tumor size, LCC, ADC and APT value between groups were compared. Binary logistic regression was used to screen the EPE predictors. The receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of variables for predicting EPE. The diagnostic efficacy of combined models (model I: ADC+LCC+tumor size; model II: APT+LCC+tumor size; and model III: APT +ADC+LCC+tumor size) were also analyzed.ResultsAPT, ADC, tumor size and the LCC were independent predictors of EPE. The area under the curve (AUC) of APT, ADC, tumor size and the LCC were 0.752, 0.665, 0.700 and 0.756, respectively. The AUC of model I, model II, and model III were 0.803, 0.845 and 0.869, respectively. The cutoff value of APT, ADC, tumor size and the LCC were 3.65%, 0.97×10−3mm2/s, 17.30mm and 10.78mm, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity of APT, ADC, tumor size and the LCC were 76%/89.4.0%, 80%/59.6%, 54%/78.9%, 72%/66%, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity of model I, Model II and Model III were 74%/72.3%, 82%/72.5% and 84%/80.9%, respectively.Data conclusionAmide proton transfer imaging has added value for predicting EPE. The combination model of APT balanced the sensitivity and specificity.

Background and objectiveThe pathological type of non–small cell lung cancer is considered to be an important factor affecting the treatment and prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of spectral parameters of dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (DLCT) in determining efficacy to distinguish adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SC), and their combined diagnostic efficacy was also analyzed.MethodsThis is a single-center prospective study, and we collected 70 patients with lung SC and 127 patients with lung AC confirmed by histopathological examination. Morphological parameters, plain scan CT value, biphasic enhanced CT value, and spectral parameters were calculated. The diagnostic efficiency of morphological parameters, spectral parameters, and spectral parameters combined with morphological parameters was obtained by statistical analysis.ResultsIn univariate analysis, seven morphological CT features differed significantly between SC and AC: tumor location (distribution), lobulation, spicule, air bronchogram, vacuole sign, lung atelectasis and/or obstructive pneumonia, and vascular involvement (all p < 0.05). In the arterial phase and the venous phase, the spectral parameters of AC were higher than those of SC (AP-Zeff: 8.07 ± 0.23 vs. 7.85 ± 0.16; AP-ID: 1.41 ± 0.47 vs. 0.94 ± 0.28; AP-NID: 0.13 ± 0.04 vs. 0.09 ± 0.03; AP-λ: 3.42 ± 1.10 vs. 2.33 ± 0.96; VP-Zeff: 8.26 ± 0.23 vs. 7.96 ± 0.16; VP-ID: 1.18 ± 0.51 vs. 1.16 ± 0.30; VP-NID: 0.39 ± 0.13 vs. 0.29 ± 0.08; VP-λ: 4.42 ± 1.28 vs. 2.85 ± 0.72; p < 0.001). When conducting multivariate analysis combining CT features and DLCT parameters with the best diagnostic efficacy, the independent predictors of AC were distribution on peripheral (OR, 4.370; 95% CI, 1.485–12.859; p = 0.007), presence of air bronchogram (OR, 5.339; 95% CI, 1.729–16.484; p = 0.004), and presence of vacuole sign ( OR, 7.330; 95% CI, 1.030–52.184; p = 0.047). Receiver operating characteristic curves of the SC and AC showed that VP-λ had the best diagnostic performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.864 and sensitivity and specificity rates of 85.8% and 74.3%, respectively; the AUC was increased to 0.946 when morphological parameters were combined, and sensitivity and specificity rates were 89.8% and 87.1%, respectively.ConclusionThe quantitative parameters of the DLCT spectrum are of great value in the diagnosis of SC and AC, and the combination of morphological parameters and spectral parameters is helpful to distinguish SC from AC.