Search

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. As the most prevalent molecular mutation subtypes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EGFR-TKIs are currently a standard first-line therapy for targeting the mutated EGFR in advanced NSCLC patients. However, 20-30% of this subset of patients shows primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Patients with co-mutations of EGFR and several other genes have a poor response to EGFR-TKIs, whereas the prognostic and predictive significance of EGFR/TP53 co-mutation in NSCLC patients remains controversial. Meanwhile, little is known about how to choose an optimal therapeutic strategy for this subset of patients. Presently, no drugs targeting TP53 mutations are available on the market, and some p53 protein activators are in the early stage of clinical trials. A combination of EGFR-TKIs with antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy or other agents might be a more appropriate strategy to tackle the problem. In this review, we describe the prognostic and predictive value of EGFR/TP53 co-mutation in NSCLC patients, investigate the mechanisms of this co-mutation affecting the response to EGFR-TKIs, and further explore optimal regimens effectively to prolong the survival time of the NSCLC patients harboring this co-mutation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. As the most prevalent molecular mutation subtypes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EGFR-TKIs are currently a standard first-line therapy for targeting the mutated EGFR in advanced NSCLC patients. However, 20-30% of this subset of patients shows primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Patients with co-mutations of EGFR and several other genes have a poor response to EGFR-TKIs, whereas the prognostic and predictive significance of EGFR/TP53 co-mutation in NSCLC patients remains controversial. Meanwhile, little is known about how to choose an optimal therapeutic strategy for this subset of patients. Presently, no drugs targeting TP53 mutations are available on the market, and some p53 protein activators are in the early stage of clinical trials. A combination of EGFR-TKIs with antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy or other agents might be a more appropriate strategy to tackle the problem. In this review, we describe the prognostic and predictive value of EGFR/TP53 co-mutation in NSCLC patients, investigate the mechanisms of this co-mutation affecting the response to EGFR-TKIs, and further explore optimal regimens effectively to prolong the survival time of the NSCLC patients harboring this co-mutation.

In this study, we evaluated clinical parameters to predict the primary resistance of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy as the first-line treatment in patients with hormone receptor (HR)+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We performed a data analysis of patients diagnosed with HR+, HER2-MBC who received palbociclib plus letrozole as the first-line treatment in the metastatic setting from the clinical data warehouse in Samsung Medical Center. In this study, 305 patients were included in the final data analysis. The median follow-up duration was 31 months, and we observed 123 cases of disease progression. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28.7 months, and 38 patients (12.5%) had less than a 6-month PFS. The multivariate analysis suggested that primary resistance to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) (hazard ratio: 1.91), presence of liver metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.17), initial elevation of serum CA-15-3 (hazard ratio: 1.99), weak positivity of estrogen receptor (ER) (hazard ratio: 2.28), Ki-67 3+ or 4+ (hazard ratios: 2.58 and 10.28), and presence of mutation (hazard ratio: 9.59) were associated with a short PFS duration. A further prediction model was developed with data from 256 patients and 33 cases of disease progression in 6 months. This model included five factors—primary resistance to adjuvant ET (odds ratio, OR: 1.14), liver metastasis (OR: 1.56), initial CA-15-3 elevation (OR: 1.51), weak ER expression (OR: 2.22), and BRCA2 mutation (OR: 2.85)—and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.842 (95% CI: 0.775, 0.909; p < 0.001). Finally, we divided them into four risk groups according to the prediction model with the five risk factors. These four groups had different PFS (p < 0.001) and primary resistance of palbociclib with letrozole [OR of group 2 vs. group 1 (ref): 2.18 (p = 0.002), OR of group 3: 3.91 (p < 0.001), and OR of group 4: 4.25 (p < 0.001)]. We developed a prediction model of primary resistance to palbociclib with letrozole as the first-line treatment for HR+, HER2-MBC. Our prediction model might be helpful for considering the first-line treatment strategies. Further well-designed clinical trials would be warranted to validate our prediction model.

In this study, we evaluated clinical parameters to predict the primary resistance of palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy as the first-line treatment in patients with hormone receptor (HR)+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We performed a data analysis of patients diagnosed with HR+, HER2-MBC who received palbociclib plus letrozole as the first-line treatment in the metastatic setting from the clinical data warehouse in Samsung Medical Center. In this study, 305 patients were included in the final data analysis. The median follow-up duration was 31 months, and we observed 123 cases of disease progression. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28.7 months, and 38 patients (12.5%) had less than a 6-month PFS. The multivariate analysis suggested that primary resistance to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) (hazard ratio: 1.91), presence of liver metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.17), initial elevation of serum CA-15-3 (hazard ratio: 1.99), weak positivity of estrogen receptor (ER) (hazard ratio: 2.28), Ki-67 3+ or 4+ (hazard ratios: 2.58 and 10.28), and presence of mutation (hazard ratio: 9.59) were associated with a short PFS duration. A further prediction model was developed with data from 256 patients and 33 cases of disease progression in 6 months. This model included five factors—primary resistance to adjuvant ET (odds ratio, OR: 1.14), liver metastasis (OR: 1.56), initial CA-15-3 elevation (OR: 1.51), weak ER expression (OR: 2.22), and BRCA2 mutation (OR: 2.85)—and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.842 (95% CI: 0.775, 0.909; p < 0.001). Finally, we divided them into four risk groups according to the prediction model with the five risk factors. These four groups had different PFS (p < 0.001) and primary resistance of palbociclib with letrozole [OR of group 2 vs. group 1 (ref): 2.18 (p = 0.002), OR of group 3: 3.91 (p < 0.001), and OR of group 4: 4.25 (p < 0.001)]. We developed a prediction model of primary resistance to palbociclib with letrozole as the first-line treatment for HR+, HER2-MBC. Our prediction model might be helpful for considering the first-line treatment strategies. Further well-designed clinical trials would be warranted to validate our prediction model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mucosal melanomas including melanomas of the urogenital tract represent a rare type of melanoma characterized by low mutational burden and poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibition has so far only been assessed in a limited number of mucosal melanoma patients and, in contrast to response in cutaneous melanoma, was associated with disappointing response rates. The oncolytic viral immunotherapy Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has recently been approved for treatment of locally advanced or unresectable melanoma. T-VEC combines direct oncolytic effects with local and systemic immune-mediated anti-tumor response. Our rationale to use T-VEC in this case was an expected augmentation of immunogenicity by tumor lysis to overcome primary resistance of a mucosal melanoma to immune checkpoint blockade.Objective: To report the first case of an advanced mucosal melanoma of the urethra treated with intralesional application of Talimogene laherparepvec.Case Report: A 78-years old female patient was diagnosed with an advanced mucosal melanoma of the urethra with inguinal lymph node metastases and intravaginal mucosal metastases. Shortly after surgical resection of the tumor mass, intravaginal mucosal metastases, and new nodal metastases in proximity of the left iliac vessels were diagnosed. The patient was treated with the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab and obtained a stable disease lasting for 30 weeks. However, upon checkpoint inhibition the patient developed a loco-regional progressive disease featuring bleeding intravaginal metastases, while nodal metastases remained stable. We stopped treatment with pembrolizumab and administered T-VEC directly into the intravaginal mucosal metastases. After five injections T-VEC yielded a partial response with clinical regression of the injected mucosal metastases. Disease remained stable for 16 weeks under biweekly T-VEC treatment. Thereafter the patient showed disease progression in nodal metastases. T-VEC was discontinued. Immunotherapy with pembrolizumab was restarted but failed to achieve a response. Finally, targeted therapy with imatinib was induced in presence of a druggable c-KIT mutation, leading to a considerable response of all tumor sites that is still ongoing.Conclusion: T-VEC represents an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with loco-regionally advanced mucosal melanoma. In combination with immunotherapy, T-VEC bears the potential of synergistic effects to overcome the specific primary resistance of mucosal melanoma to immune checkpoint blockade.

Background: Mucosal melanomas including melanomas of the urogenital tract represent a rare type of melanoma characterized by low mutational burden and poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibition has so far only been assessed in a limited number of mucosal melanoma patients and, in contrast to response in cutaneous melanoma, was associated with disappointing response rates. The oncolytic viral immunotherapy Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has recently been approved for treatment of locally advanced or unresectable melanoma. T-VEC combines direct oncolytic effects with local and systemic immune-mediated anti-tumor response. Our rationale to use T-VEC in this case was an expected augmentation of immunogenicity by tumor lysis to overcome primary resistance of a mucosal melanoma to immune checkpoint blockade. Objective: To report the first case of an advanced mucosal melanoma of the urethra treated with intralesional application of Talimogene laherparepvec. Case Report: A 78-years old female patient was diagnosed with an advanced mucosal melanoma of the urethra with inguinal lymph node metastases and intravaginal mucosal metastases. Shortly after surgical resection of the tumor mass, intravaginal mucosal metastases, and new nodal metastases in proximity of the left iliac vessels were diagnosed. The patient was treated with the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab and obtained a stable disease lasting for 30 weeks. However, upon checkpoint inhibition the patient developed a loco-regional progressive disease featuring bleeding intravaginal metastases, while nodal metastases remained stable. We stopped treatment with pembrolizumab and administered T-VEC directly into the intravaginal mucosal metastases. After five injections T-VEC yielded a partial response with clinical regression of the injected mucosal metastases. Disease remained stable for 16 weeks under biweekly T-VEC treatment. Thereafter the patient showed disease progression in nodal metastases. T-VEC was discontinued. Immunotherapy with pembrolizumab was restarted but failed to achieve a response. Finally, targeted therapy with imatinib was induced in presence of a druggable c-KIT mutation, leading to a considerable response of all tumor sites that is still ongoing. Conclusion: T-VEC represents an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with loco-regionally advanced mucosal melanoma. In combination with immunotherapy, T-VEC bears the potential of synergistic effects to overcome the specific primary resistance of mucosal melanoma to immune checkpoint blockade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our ability to detect and directly target the oncogenic alterations responsible for tumor proliferation has contributed significantly to the management of lung cancer in the last decade. The therapeutic efficacy of molecularly targeted therapy is, however, mainly limited to patients harboring certain genetic mutations and is generally short-lived. Herein, we review primary and secondary drug resistance using the most well-studied of the molecularly targeted agents, the tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor and the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement, the current limitations of targeted therapies and their consequences on the management of patients with lung cancer.

Our ability to detect and directly target the oncogenic alterations responsible for tumor proliferation has contributed significantly to the management of lung cancer in the last decade. The therapeutic efficacy of molecularly targeted therapy is, however, mainly limited to patients harboring certain genetic mutations and is generally short-lived. Herein, we review primary and secondary drug resistance using the most well-studied of the molecularly targeted agents, the tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, and the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement, the current limitations of targeted therapies and their consequences on the management of patients with lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]