Search

Heat and Water Deficit Stress (WDS) tend to impede and restrict the efficiency of photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and maximum photochemical quantum yield in plants based on their characteristic ability to interfere with the electron transport system in photosystem II. Dissection of the electron transport pathway in Photosystem II (PSII) under water deficit and Heat Stress (HS) can be insightful in gaining knowledge on the various attributes of the photosynthetic performance of a plant. We attempt a high-resolution dissection of electron transport in PSII with studies on chlorophyll a fast fluorescence kinetics and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) as a response to and recovery from these stresses in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] in isolation and combination. In this study, we bring out the mechanisms by which both heat and water stress, in isolation and in combination, affect the photosynthetic electron transport in Photosystem II. Our results indicate that oxygen evolution complex (OEC) damage is the primary effect of heat stress and is not seen with the same intensity in the water-stressed plants. Low exciton absorption flux in heat stress and combined stress was seen due to OEC damage, and this caused an electron transport traffic jam in the donor side of PS II. Both the specific energy flux model and the phenomenological flux model developed from the derived values in our study show that water deficit stress in combination with heat stress has a much stronger effect than the stresses in isolation on the overall electron transport pathway of the PS II in pearl millet plants.

Maize productivity is significantly impacted by drought; therefore, improvement of drought tolerance is a critical goal in maize breeding. To achieve this, a better understanding of the genetic basis of drought tolerance is necessary. Our study aimed to identify genomic regions associated with drought tolerance-related traits by phenotyping a mapping population of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) for two seasons under well-watered (WW) and water-deficit (WD) conditions. We also used single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping through genotyping-by-sequencing to map these regions and attempted to identify candidate genes responsible for the observed phenotypic variation. Phenotyping of the RILs population revealed significant variability in most of the traits, with normal frequency distributions, indicating their polygenic nature. We generated a linkage map using 1,241 polymorphic SNPs distributed over 10 chromosomes (chrs), covering a total genetic distance of 5,471.55 cM. We identified 27 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with various morphophysiological and yield-related traits, with 13 QTLs identified under WW conditions and 12 under WD conditions. We found one common major QTL ( qCW2-1 ) for cob weight and a minor QTL ( qCH1-1 ) for cob height that were consistently identified under both water regimes. We also detected one major and one minor QTL for the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) trait under WD conditions on chr 2, bin 2.10. Furthermore, we identified one major QTL ( qCH1-2 ) and one minor QTL ( qCH1-1 ) on chr 1 that were located at different genomic positions to those identified in earlier studies. We found co-localized QTLs for stomatal conductance and grain yield on chr 6 ( qg s 6-2 and qGY6-1 ), while co-localized QTLs for stomatal conductance and transpiration rate were identified on chr 7 ( qg s 7-1 and qTR7-1 ). We also attempted to identify the candidate genes responsible for the observed phenotypic variation; our analysis revealed that the major candidate genes associated with QTLs detected under water deficit conditions were related to growth and development, senescence, abscisic acid (ABA) signaling, signal transduction, and transporter activity in stress tolerance. The QTL regions identified in this study may be useful in designing markers that can be utilized in marker-assisted selection breeding. In addition, the putative candidate genes can be isolated and functionally characterized so that their role in imparting drought tolerance can be more fully understood., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Sarkar, Varalaxmi, Vanaja, RaviKumar, Prabhakar, Yadav, Maheswari and Singh.)

Heat and Water Deficit Stress (WDS) tend to impede and restrict the efficiency of photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and maximum photochemical quantum yield in plants based on their characteristic ability to interfere with the electron transport system in photosystem II. Dissection of the electron transport pathway in Photosystem II (PSII) under water deficit and Heat Stress (HS) can be insightful in gaining knowledge on the various attributes of the photosynthetic performance of a plant. We attempt a high-resolution dissection of electron transport in PSII with studies on chlorophyll a fast fluorescence kinetics and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) as a response to and recovery from these stresses in pearl millet [ Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] in isolation and combination. In this study, we bring out the mechanisms by which both heat and water stress, in isolation and in combination, affect the photosynthetic electron transport in Photosystem II. Our results indicate that oxygen evolution complex (OEC) damage is the primary effect of heat stress and is not seen with the same intensity in the water-stressed plants. Low exciton absorption flux in heat stress and combined stress was seen due to OEC damage, and this caused an electron transport traffic jam in the donor side of PS II. Both the specific energy flux model and the phenomenological flux model developed from the derived values in our study show that water deficit stress in combination with heat stress has a much stronger effect than the stresses in isolation on the overall electron transport pathway of the PS II in pearl millet plants., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Shanker, Amirineni, Bhanu, Yadav, Jyothilakshmi, Vanaja, Singh, Sarkar, Maheswari and Singh.)