Search

The plastome (plastid genome) represents an indispensable molecular data source for studying phylogeny and evolution in plants. Although the plastome size is much smaller than that of nuclear genome, and multiple plastome annotation tools have been specifically developed, accurate annotation of plastomes is still a challenging task. Different plastome annotation tools apply different principles and workflows, and annotation errors frequently occur in published plastomes and those issued in GenBank. It is therefore timely to compare available annotation tools and establish standards for plastome annotation. In this review, we review the basic characteristics of plastomes, trends in the publication of new plastomes, the annotation principles and application of major plastome annotation tools, and common errors in plastome annotation. We propose possible methods to judge pseudogenes and RNA-editing genes, jointly consider sequence similarity, customed algorithms, conserved domain or protein structure. We also propose the necessity of establishing a database of reference plastomes with standardized annotations, and put forward a set of quantitative standards for evaluating plastome annotation quality for the scientific community. In addition, we discuss how to generate standardized GenBank annotation flatfiles for submission and downstream analysis. Finally, we prospect future technologies for plastome annotation integrating plastome annotation approaches with diverse evidences and algorithms of nuclear genome annotation tools. This review will help researchers more efficiently use available tools to achieve high-quality plastome annotation, and promote the process of standardized annotation of the plastome., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Qu, Zou, Zhang, Stull and Yi.)

Chloroplasts and mitochondria each contain their own genomes, which have historically been and continue to be important sources of information for inferring the phylogenetic relationships among land plants. The organelles are predominantly inherited from the same parent, and therefore should exhibit phylogenetic concordance. In this study, we examine the mitochondrion and chloroplast genomes of 226 land plants to infer the degree of similarity between the organelles' evolutionary histories. Our results show largely concordant topologies are inferred between the organelles, aside from four well-supported conflicting relationships that warrant further investigation. Despite broad patterns of topological concordance, our findings suggest that the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes evolved with significant differences in molecular evolution. The differences result in the genes from the chloroplast and the mitochondrion preferentially clustering with other genes from their respective organelles by a program that automates selection of evolutionary model partitions for sequence alignments. Further investigation showed that changes in compositional heterogeneity are not always uniform across divergences in the land plant tree of life. These results indicate that although the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes have coexisted for over 1 billion years, phylogenetically, they are still evolving sufficiently independently to warrant separate models of evolution. As genome sequencing becomes more accessible, research into these organelles' evolution will continue revealing insight into the ancient cellular events that shaped not only their history, but the history of plants as a whole., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Tyszka, Bretz, Robertson, Woodcock-Girard, Ramanauskas, Larson, Stull and Walker.)

Urticeae s.l. , a tribe of Urticaceae well-known for their stinging trichomes, consists of more than 10 genera and approximately 220 species. Relationships within this tribe remain poorly known due to the limited molecular and taxonomic sampling in previous studies, and chloroplast genome (CP genome/plastome) evolution is still largely unaddressed. To address these concerns, we used genome skimming data-CP genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA (18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-26S); 106 accessions-for the very first time to attempt resolving the recalcitrant relationships and to explore chloroplast structural evolution across the group. Furthermore, we assembled a taxon rich two-locus dataset of trnL-F spacer and ITS sequences across 291 accessions to complement our genome skimming dataset. We found that Urticeae plastomes exhibit the tetrad structure typical of angiosperms, with sizes ranging from 145 to 161 kb and encoding a set of 110-112 unique genes. The studied plastomes have also undergone several structural variations, including inverted repeat (IR) expansions and contractions, inversion of the trnN-GUU gene, losses of the rps19 gene, and the rpl2 intron, and the proliferation of multiple repeat types; 11 hypervariable regions were also identified. Our phylogenomic analyses largely resolved major relationships across tribe Urticeae, supporting the monophyly of the tribe and most of its genera except for Laportea , Urera , and Urtica , which were recovered as polyphyletic with strong support. Our analyses also resolved with strong support several previously contentious branches: (1) Girardinia as a sister to the Dendrocnide - Discocnide - Laportea - Nanocnide - Zhengyia - Urtica - Hesperocnide clade and (2) Poikilospermum as sister to the recently transcribed Urera sensu stricto . Analyses of the taxon-rich, two-locus dataset showed lower support but was largely congruent with results from the CP genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA dataset. Collectively, our study highlights the power of genome skimming data to ameliorate phylogenetic resolution and provides new insights into phylogenetic relationships and chloroplast structural evolution in Urticeae., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Ogoma, Liu, Stull, Wambulwa, Oyebanji, Milne, Monro, Zhao, Li and Wu.)