Search

BackgroundThe neurobiological basis of suicidal behaviors among female adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) remains largely unclear.Materials and methodsFifty-eight drug-naïve, first-episode female adolescent MDD [including 31 patients with suicidal attempt (SA group) and 27 patients without SA (non-SA group)], and 36 matched healthy controls (HCs) participated in the present study. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on each subject. The metrics of the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), fractional ALFF (fALFF), and regional homogeneity (ReHo) were compared among the three groups. Then seed-based functional connectivity (FC) was conducted based on the ALFF/fALFF and ReHo results, which were then correlated to clinical variables.ResultsCompared with the non-SA group, the SA group exhibited increased fALFF in the bilateral insula and right precentral gyrus, and enhanced ReHo in the left superior temporal gyrus, left middle cingulate cortex, right insula, and right precentral gyrus. Relative to the HCs, the SA group demonstrated additionally reduced fALFF and ReHo in the left middle frontal gyrus. Moreover, the SA group showed increased FC between the right precentral gyrus and the left middle frontal gyrus and left insula, and between the right insula and anterior/middle cingulate cortex compared to the non-SA and HC groups. In addition, the fALFF in the left middle frontal gyrus was positively correlated with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores, and the values in the fALFF/ReHo in the right insula were positively correlated with the duration of MDD within the patient group.ConclusionThese findings highlight the multiple abnormalities of the frontolimbic circuit, which may enhance our understanding of the neurobiological basis underlying female MDD with SA during adolescence.

BackgroundChildren and adolescents are at a high risk of major depressive disorder (MDD) with known sex differences in epidemiology. However, there are currently no objective laboratory-based sex-specific biomarkers available to support the diagnoses of male and female patients with MDD.MethodsHere, a male set of 42 cases and 27 healthy controls (HCs) and a female set of 42 cases and 22 HCs were recruited. This study investigated the sex differences of plasma metabolite biomarkers in young patients with MDD by the application of ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography equipped with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry.ResultsThe metabolic profiles showed clear separations in both male and female sets. In total, this study identified 57 male-related and 53 female-related differential metabolites. Compared with HCs, both male and female subjects with MDD displayed four significantly altered pathways. Notably, biliverdin was selected as an independent diagnostic male-specific biomarker with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.966, and phosphatidylcholine (10:0/14:1) was selected as a female-specific biomarker, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.957.ConclusionThis metabolomics study may aid in the development of a plasma-based test for the diagnosis of male and female children and adolescents with MDD, as well as give new insight into the pathophysiology of sex differences in children and adolescents with MDD.

Background: Anxiety disorder is the most prevalent mental disorder in children and adolescents. However, evidence for efficacy and acceptability between individual cognitive behavior therapy (I-CBT) and group cognitive behavior therapy (G-CBT) in anxiety disorders in children and adolescents remains unclear.Methods: Eight electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and LILACS) were searched from inception to October 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing I-CBT with G-CBT for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents were included. The primary outcomes were efficacy (mean change in anxiety symptom scores) at post-treatment and acceptability (all-cause discontinuation). The secondary outcome was remission at post-treatment. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to examine whether the result would be influenced by age, number of treatment sessions, parental involvement, male/female sex, and number of participants.Results: Nine studies were selected in this meta-analysis. The pooled analyses indicated no significant difference between I-CBT and G-CBT for efficacy at post-treatment [standardized mean difference (SMD), −0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), −0.37 to 0.09], acceptability [odds ratio (OR), 1.30; 95% CI, 0.61–2.77], and remission at post-treatment (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.79–1.66). In the subgroup analysis of age, I-CBT was significantly more effective than G-CBT in adolescents at post-treatment (SMD, −0.77; 95% CI, −1.51 to −0.02), but not in children (SMD, 0.00; 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.20). However, the findings were not materially different from those of the efficacy subgroup analysis of number of treatment sessions, parental involvement, male/female sex, and number of participants.Conclusions: Based on those current evidence, I-CBT was shown to be more beneficial than G-CBT for anxiety disorders in adolescents, but not in children. However, further well-designed clinical studies should be performed to confirm these findings.Systematic Review Registration:http://osf.io/xrjkp, identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XRJKP.