Search

People living rurally frequently experience health disparities especially if living with a long-term condition (LTC) or multi-morbidity. Self-management support is a key component of LTC management and commonly included in rehabilitation programmes to enhance ability to self-manage health and encourage physical activity. Such programmes are however often condition focussed and despite evidence for their effectiveness, are not always feasible to deliver in rural settings. Generic programmes are arguably more optimal in the rural context and delivery can be face to face or remotely (via telehealth). The aim of this explorative integrative review was to collate and present international evidence for development, delivery, integration, and support of community-based, generic LTC group rehabilitation programmes delivered rurally in person, or remotely using telehealth. Electronic databases were systematically searched using MeSH terms and keywords. For inclusion, articles were screened for relevance to the aim, and practical information pertaining to the aim were extracted, charted, and organized deductively into themes of Development, Delivery, Integration, and Support. Within each theme, data were synthesized inductively into categories (Theory, Context, Interpersonal aspects, and Technology and Programme aspects). Fifty-five studies were included. Five studies contributed information about community based programmes delivered via the internet. Development was the only theme populated by information from all categories. The theme of Support was only populated with information from one category. Our review has drawn together a large body of diverse work. It has focused on finding practical information pertaining to the best ways to develop, deliver, integrate, and support a community-based generic rehabilitation programme for people living with long-term health conditions, delivered rurally and/or potentially via the internet. Practical suggestions were thematically organized into categories of theory, context, interpersonal aspects, and technology and programme aspects. While the findings of this review might appear simple and self-evident, they are perhaps difficult to enact in practice.

BackgroundLifestyle programmes are important in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The Diabetes Community Exercise Programme (DCEP) is an exercise and educational programme for adults living with T2D with the aim of enhancing exercise self-efficacy and supporting wellbeing. DCEP is underpinned by a model of person/whānau-centred care and the spirit of Motivational Interviewing. Person-centred care models in the context of rehabilitation and long-term health conditions are still evolving. This paper explores what those involved in DCEP perceived important to its person/whānau-centredness.MethodAn evaluative qualitative methodological approach was used with data collected by open-ended interviews and a focus-group at completion of the initial 12-week part of DCEP. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants were 16 DCEP attendees and 13 healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in DCEP delivering. Data were analysed using the General Inductive Approach.ResultsThe three interconnected themes constructed from the analysis were ‘It's all about relationships’, Balancing the Outside World, and Empowering through Knowledge. Through the experience and motivation of positive person-centred relationships, DCEP addressed attendees' T2D health needs, but they were constantly balancing these needs with those of family, employers, finances, other health needs and life interests. DCEP relationships facilitated ongoing discussions between attendees and between attendees and HCPs. The ability to discuss in a supportive and non-judgmental environment helped attendees to make sense and process the information they gained at DCEP. This empowering through knowledge in turn helped attendees to work out ways of balancing the outside world and thus better address their T2D needs.ConclusionIt is “all about relationships” was key to DCEP's person/whānau-centred approach—all other factors related back to the development and maintenance of relationships. These relationships were between all whānau involved: the attendees, their family, the wider community, the healthcare provider organisations, and the HCPs and personnel involved in delivering DCEPs. These relationships created an accepting, understanding and social atmosphere that enabled attendance and facilitated both knowledge exchange and ability to exercise, both considered to be beneficial by attendees. Importantly, these relationships took time to develop, but the benefits were worth the investment.