Search

We examined the expression of p53, p21, cyclin D1, E, and PCNA in 75 cases of gastric cancer by immunohistochemical study and the expression of p21 RNA in cases by in situ hybridization. The rate of stage III, IV cases of p53(+) p21(-) group was significantly higher than that of any other groups. The apportinately 3-year survival rate of p53(+) p21(-) group was significantly lower than either that of p21(+) p53(-) or p53(-) p21(-) group. The 3-year survival rates of positive cases were significantly lower than those of negative cases on both cyclin D1 and E. The positive rate of cyclin E of the p53(-) p21(+) group was significantly lower than that of the p53(+) p21(-) group. The average PCNA Labeling. Index (LI) of the p53(+) p21(-) group was significantly higher than that of the p53(-) p21(+) group. The 3-year survival rate of cases with expression of p21 RNA was higher than that of cases without p21 RNA. Average PCNA L1 of cases with expression of mutant-type p53 was high and the number of poor prognostic cases in cases with expression of mutant-type p53 was large. In contrast, the average PCNA LI of cases with expression of p21 was low and the number of good prognostic cases with expression of p21 was large. These results suggest that p21 suppresses synthesis of DNA via cyclin E and PCNA.

A thirty three-year-old male complaining of vomiting was diagnosed as having type 3 advanced gastric cancer of upper stomach and multiple liver metastasis, and had undergone total gastrectomy. The conclusive stage was P2H2n4se stage IVb. Intraoperatively, ethanol injection was performed for the liver metastasis under ultrasonography, and CDDP 100 mg was injected into the intra-abdominal cavity. Postoperative adjuvant therapy was added using oral fluorouracil and OK-432. Then we utilized FP chemotherapy (consisting of 5-FU and cisplatin) and radiotherapy for the bone metastasis. The patient survived 4 years and 4 months with good quality of life.

A clinical phase III study of tropisetron capsule was conducted to assess its efficacy, safety and usefulness on nausea and vomiting induced by carboplatin or non-platinum anti-cancer drugs. The study was conducted in patients who experienced vomiting on previous chemotherapy. Tropisetron 5 mg capsule was given to patients once 2 hours prior to the first administration of either carboplatin or non-platinum anti-cancer drugs; the patients were then observed for nausea and/or vomiting during 24 hours after the first administration. Some 56.7% (17/30) of the patients did not vomit after tropisetron administration, and the frequency of vomiting was significantly reduced compared with that during the previous chemotherapy. Further, in the clinical efficacy ratings, in which the efficacy was assessed on the basis of the nausea and vomiting data, 83.3% (25/30) of cases were rated as "effective or better". Adverse events observed were 3 cases of mild headache, but these were not clinically problematic. The above results reveal that tropisetron capsule is significantly effective and safe in the treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by carboplatin or non-platinum anti-cancer drugs; in addition, tropisetron proved to be highly useful for its convenience as an oral agent.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind comparative study of tropisetron capsule was conducted to assess its clinical usefulness for nausea and vomiting induced by the anticancer drug, cisplatin, at a single dose of 50 mg/m2 or higher. Either 5mg tropisetron capsule or its placebo was given orally to patients 2 hours prior to cisplatin administration; the clinical efficacy was determined the severity of nausea and the number of emesis that occurred during 24 hours after cisplatin. Tropisetron significantly exceeded the placebo in the assessment of clinical efficacy. The ratings for the tropisetron group and the placebo group were 91.7% (22/24 cases) and 25.9% (7/27 cases), respectively. Adverse events observed were one case of headache in the tropisetron group and one diarrhea in the placebo group, while neither case was serious nor clinically problematic in particular. The above results reveal that tropisetron 5 mg capsule is significantly effective in the treatment of anticancer drug-induced nausea and vomiting. It has also been confirmed that tropisetron is a useful agent without any safety problems.

A comparative clinical trial of tropisetron capsule was conducted in three dose groups to investigate its optimal dose on nausea and vomiting induced by anti-cancer drugs, including cisplatin. The doses were randomized by the central registration office. In the assessment of clinical efficacy, cases rated as "effective" or better accounted for 61.5% of the 2.5 mg group (16/26), 80.8% of the 5.0mg group (21/26) and 80.0% of the 10mg group (24/30), respectively; the ratings for the 5mg and 10mg groups were almost equivalent, which was higher than that for the 2.5mg group. Adverse events observed were fever, diarrhea, drowsiness, headache and/or facial erythema in 4 out of 97 cases. Abnormal laboratory findings noted were 6 cases of increased GOT, GPT, LDH, total bilirubin and/or creatinine, but none of these was serious or clinically problematic in particular. On the basis of the above results, the optimal dose of Tropisetron (capsule) is considered to be 5mg once daily.

A multicenter cooperative study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of l-leucovorin (l-LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment in 69 cases of advanced gastric cancer. l-LV was administered intravenously by a 2-hour infusion at a dosage of 250 mg/m2 and 5-FU at a dosage of 600 mg/m2, intravenously via bolus one hour after administration of l-LV had been started. The combination was given weekly for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. Patients were evaluated for response after the sixth dose. Nineteen PRs were noted in the 55 patients for an overall response rate of 34.5%. Median survival time was 190 days for eligible cases, and 448 days for PR cases. Age and performance status (PS) appeared to influence clinical response. Patients aged 49 years or younger showed a significantly higher PR rate than those aged 50 years or older. The PR rate was significantly higher in the patients of PS 0-1 than those of PS 2. Diarrhea and leukopenia were experienced in 46.7% and 65% of patients, respectively. Patients who had severe toxicities required discontinuity of treatment. After recovery, treatment was repeated. The clinical results are promising for patients with advanced gastric cancer, particularly middle-aged patients. However, whether the l-leucovorin and 5-FU combination therapy will ultimately produce superior results in middle-aged patients awaits the results of Phase III trials.

A 68-year-old female patient with unresectable advanced gastric cancer was treated by combined administration of MMC (10 mg/month), 5-FU (200 mg/day) and OK-432 (5KE/2 weeks). Two months after starting the treatment, there was a diminution in the serum CEA level. Six months later, the CEA had decreased to the normal level, primary and metastatic sites completely disappeared and no cancer cell was confirmed by endoscopic biopsy. The patient has survived for 33 months of a state of complete response.

This paper described an outline of clinically applications of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, mainly on ondansetron, which control nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy. Clinically, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists demonstrated significantly superior antiemetic effects to metoclopramide which has been prescribed for relatively long time. The response rates for granisetron and those for ondansetron were different due to the different categorical scales. However, when the same scale was applied, similar efficacies have been observed. Introduction of the tablet form may well broaden the clinical applications. Considering the highly evaluated safety, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, from the viewpoints of clinical usefulness and safety, seems to be useful drugs for controlling nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy.

This paper described an outline of pharmacological studies of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, mainly on ondansetron, which control nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy. Administration of cytotoxic drugs is known to increase serotonin (5-HT) concentrations, and when released, 5-HT provokes the emetic responses via two routes; 1) 5-HT acts as an intrinsic transmitter substance and stimulates the emetic response via 5-HT3 receptors on vagal afferent terminals; 2) 5-HT transmits impulses to the vomiting center via 5-HT3 receptors on the chemoreceptor trigger zone in the area postrema of the central nervous system. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are thought to exert an antiemetic action by specifically and competitively blocking 5-HT3 receptors.

A sixty-eight-year-old male patient was diagnosed as having inoperable advanced gastric cancer with liver and lung metastasis. The patient was treated by combined chemo-immunotherapy of MMC 10 mg/M, 5'-DFUR 800 mg/day and OK-432 5 KE/2 W. Six months after commencing chemotherapy, CT-scan and upper GI series revealed that metasized liver tumors and stomach lesion were remarkably decreased in size and no cancer cell was confirmed by endoscopic biopsy. Further, the metastatic lung tumor has disappeared on chest X-ray. The patient had been well without any evidence of tumor re-progression for over one year, but from July the liver tumor began to metastasize again and the patient eventually died of liver metastasis on Jan. 1, 1993.

In order to make an objective evaluation of anti-emetic effect, safety and usefulness of ondansetron injection in nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, we carried out a double-blind placebo controlled comparative study in patients receiving high-single dose (50 mg/m2 or more) of cisplatin. Either 4 mg of ondansetron or saline injection was given intravenously at 15 min. before administration of cisplatin. If anti-emetic effect of the test drug was insufficient, an additional dose of 4mg of ondansetron was given intravenously, as the rescue medication. Ondansetron was significantly superior to placebo in anti-emetic effect (p < 0.001). Efficacy rates were 66.7% (22/33 cases) in ondansetron and 20.0% (6/30 cases) in placebo groups. Seven and 21 cases required rescue medication with 4 mg single intravenous dose of ondansetron due to insufficiency of anti-emetic effect, in ondansetron group and placebo group, respectively. Thus the number of patients who required rescue medication was obviously greater in placebo group than that in ondansetron group. The rates of inhibitory effect of rescue medication on nausea and emesis were 14.3% (1/7 cases) in ondansetron group and 61.9% (13/21 cases) in placebo group. Side effects were observed in 1 case (eruption) in ondansetron group and in 2 cases (headache, diarrhoea; 1 case each) in placebo group. Furthermore, fever developed in 1 case in placebo group after the rescue medication. Elevation of total bilirubin value was observed in 2 cases in ondansetron group and 1 case in placebo group, however, these changes were mild and did not pose noteworthy clinical problem. From these results, ondansetron was shown to possess an excellent anti-emetic effect on nausea and emesis induced by highly emetogenic anti-cancer drugs, such as cisplatin, and to have no problem in safety, and thus it was considered to be a useful anti-emetic agent.

Clinical usefulness of ondansetron as an antiemetic for the treatment of nausea and vomiting induced by anticancer drugs including cisplatin (> or = 50 mg/m2) was evaluated by a multi-institutional, double-blind comparative study with placebo with inpatients with various malignancies. In this study, efficacy, safety and usefulness of single dose of ondansetron (4 mg) or placebo (physiological saline), given intravenously for initial nausea and vomiting were observed for 24 hours after treatment. Clinically, very effective or effective response was seen in 64% (16/25) of the group O (ondansetron) and 5.9% (1/17) of the group P (placebo). No clinically significant adverse effects or abnormal laboratory test values were reported in the group of O. Diarrhea (1 case) and the elevation of laboratory test values (GOT.GPT, T-bilirubin, LDH, in 3 cases) were reported in the group of P. General safety assessment was considered "safe" in 100% of both group O and group P, and there was no statistical difference between two groups. Usefulness was considered as "useful" in 64% (16/25) of group O and 6.3% (1/16) of group P, and O was significantly better than group P (p < 0.001) level. In conclusion, ondansetron provides a safe and effective antiemetic measure when employed therapeutically against nausea and vomiting induced by regimens including cisplatin.

Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, has already been reported to have a marked effect to alleviate or prevent nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, after its intravenous administration. The present study was planned to examine the usefulness of its tablet form, which was prepared for the convenient use in outpatients receiving chemotherapy. In order to make an objective evaluation of anti-emetic effect and safety of ondansetron 4 mg tablet, this study was conducted in double-blind comparison versus placebo in patients receiving cisplatin at a single dose of 50mg/m2 or higher. Either 4 mg of ondansetron or placebo (lactose tablet) was administered orally once at 2 hrs prior to administration of cisplatin. If any satisfactory anti-emetic effects were not obtained, 4 mg of ondansetron injection was given once intravenously as a rescue medication. The inhibitory effect on nausea and vomiting was assessed in 4 grades as "excellent", "good", "fair" and "poor" based on severity of nausea and number of vomiting that occurred during the first 24hrs after administration of cisplatin. When rescue medication was conducted, the case was assessed as "poor". Ondansetron was significantly superior to placebo in inhibition of nausea and vomiting, in which efficacy rates (excellent+good) of ondansetron and placebo groups were 58.1% (25/43 cases) and 16.7% (7/42 cases), respectively. Number of cases requiring rescue medication with ondansetron injection was obviously greater in placebo group (31 cases) than that in ondansetron group (12 cases). In those patients given ondansetron injection as the rescue medication, satisfactory effects were obtained in 5 cases in ondansetron group and in 18 cases in placebo group. Although side effects including chest itching (ondansetron group), headache and dull headache (placebo group) were observed after the rescue medication with ondansetron injection, these symptoms were not severe and disappeared after 1-2 days. As mentioned above, ondansetron tablet was shown to possess excellent anti-emetic effect on nausea and emesis induced by high dose of cisplatin and to have no problem in safety. Hence ondansetron was proven to be clinically very useful anti-emetic.

We examined the anti-emetic effect, safety and usefulness of ondansetron hydrochloride, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, given orally once daily at the dosage of 4 mg, for 3 to 5 consecutive days to patients with nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anti-cancer drugs such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and carboplatin. Out of 84 cases where anti-emetic effects were evaluated, numbers of cases assessed as excellent and good were 36 (83.3%) and 34 (40.5%), respectively, the efficacy rate being 83.3% (70/84). Side effects, such as moderate constipation (3 cases) and mild headache (3 cases), were observed in 8/85 cases (9.4%). Abnormalities in clinical laboratory findings including elevation of hepatic function and uricacid values and increase in eosinocyte counts, were observed in 3/85 cases (3.5%). As to overall safety, 78/85 cases (91.8%) were evaluated as having no problem in safety, and 7/85 cases (8.2%), as having minor problem in safety. As to clinical usefulness based on anti-emetic effect and overall safety, out of 79 cases the drug was assessed as very useful in 29 cases (36.7%) and useful in 35 cases (44.3%), the rate of "useful" or above being 81.0% (64/79). Furthermore, when ondansetron was administered in 3 courses of chemotherapy, though the number of patients was small, it was shown that anti-emetic effect of ondansetron did not decline and no problem in safety was observed. From the above, ondansetron which exerted adequate anti-emetic effect in 4 mg once daily doses was considered as a useful and safe anti-emetic in treatment of nausea and emesis associated with cancer chemotherapy.

The anti-emetic effects, safety and usefulness of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, given orally once daily for 3-5 consecutive days, were investigated in patients receiving a high single dose (greater than or equal to 50 mg/m2 or 75 mg/body) or lower multiple doses (greater than or equal to 15-20 mg/m2/day for 3-5 consecutive days) of cisplatin. Ondansetron 4 mg was administered orally once daily for 3-5 consecutive days. Efficacy rates in controlling nausea and emesis over the 3-5 days were 77.3% (17/22 cases) and 66.7% (6/9 cases) in patients receiving a high single dose and lower multiple doses of cisplatin, respectively. Side effects were observed in 2 cases (headache and elevation of blood pressure in one case and only headache in the other case.). Abnormality in clinical laboratory findings was observed in 1 case. From the above, ondansetron, showing high efficacy by oral administration 4 mg once daily for 3-5 consecutive days, without any problem in safety, was considered to be a useful anti-emetic agent.

The anti-emetic effect, safety and clinical usefulness of ondansetron for the treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by anticancer drugs including cisplatin, was evaluated by a multi-institutional study in patients with various malignancies. In this study, ondansetron was given intravenously with mainly a single dose of 4 mg to intervene nausea and vomiting. 1. Efficacy ratio of overall effects on nausea and emesis observed for 24 hours after treatment was 69.8%. 2. No side effect was observed. Laboratory tests showed temporary elevation of serum uric acid level in 1 patient in the group given 4 mg. 3. From these results, it seems that ondansetron, given intravenously after initial vomiting, was highly safe and clinically useful anti-emetic for the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with anti-cancer drugs.

Inhibitory effects on acute nausea and emesis, safety and usefulness of a single oral dose of Ondansetron tablet were evaluated in 3 different dose levels for comparison by telephone registration system, in patients receiving non-platinum anti-cancer drugs. A single dose of ondansetron at 4 mg, 8 mg or 12 mg was given orally at 2 hrs before the initial administration of anti-cancer drugs. The patients were observed for 24 hours after administration of anti-cancer drugs, for occurrence of nausea and emesis. Efficacy rates of inhibitory effects on nausea and emesis were 83.3% (10/12 cases) in 4 mg dose group, 78.6% (11/14 cases) in 8 mg dose group and 84.6% (11/13 cases) in 12 mg dose group, without statistically significant difference. Side effects were observed in 3 cases (headache, cold feeling and trembling in limbs, sleepiness) in 12 mg dose group, but these symptoms were not severe and disappeared after several hours or several days. No abnormality in clinical laboratory findings attributable to Ondansetron was observed. From the above, it was considered that Ondansetron was a clinically useful anti-emetic for nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anti-cancer drugs and that 4 mg once daily was the optimal dose.

Anti-emetic effects, safety and usefulness of Ondansetron given intravenously at 4 mg once daily for consecutive 3-5 days were investigated against nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anticancer drugs. Efficacy rates in control of nausea and emesis were 59% (20/34 cases) and 68% (23/34 cases), respectively. The efficacy rate for inhibition of nausea and emesis, calculated based on the control of nausea and emesis, was 68% (23/34 cases). Adverse events (headache and constipation) were observed in 1 case and abnormal change in clinical laboratory findings (increase in eosinophil count) in another case. Out of 42 cases in which safety was evaluated, 41 (98%) cases were assessed as "no problem in safety." However, one case with side effect was assessed as a "Minor problem in safety." From the above, it was confirmed that Ondansetron injection exerted excellent inhibitory effects against nausea and emesis induced by non-platinum anti-cancer drugs, and this drug was a highly safe and useful anti-emetic.

Anti-emetic effect, safety and clinical usefulness of Ondansetron injection given in the dose of 4 mg once daily by intravenous administration for 3-5 consecutive days were examined in patients receiving a high single dose (not less than 50 mg/m2 or over 75 mg/body) and lower multiple doses (over 15-20 mg/m2 once daily, for 3-5 consecutive days) of cisplatin. Efficacy rates of inhibitory effects on nausea and emesis in patients receiving the high single dose of cisplatin were 76% on the 1st day, 67% on the 2nd day and 78% on the 3rd day, the average being 71% (86/121 cases) for the 3 days. Those in patients receiving lower multiple doses of cisplatin were 83% on the 1st day, 78% on the 2nd day, 61% on the 3rd day, 65% on the 4th day and 57% on the 5th day, the average being 72% (13/18 cases) for the 3-5 days. Side effects were observed in 15 cases out of 207 (1st course, 182 cases; 2nd course, 21 cases; 3rd course, 4 cases), and major symptoms were headache and fever. Also, abnormalities in clinical laboratory findings attributable to Ondansetron were observed in 13 cases, mainly consisting of elevation of the hepatic function values. From the above, Ondansetron injection which showed sufficient anti-emetic effects on acute emesis and delayed emesis induced by a high single dose or lower multiple doses of cisplatin with its once daily intravenous dose given for 3-5 consecutive days, were considered a safe and clinically useful anti-emetic.

We examined anti-emetic effects, safety and the optimal dose of Ondansetron Injection given in a single intravenous dose in patients receiving a single high dose of cisplatin in randomized controlled comparative study using telephone registration. Ondansetron was injected intravenously in a single dose of 4 mg, 8 mg or 12 mg, at 15 minutes before administration of cisplatin. Nausea and emesis were observed for 24 hours after administration of cisplatin. Efficacy rate of inhibitory effects on nausea and emesis were 76% (19/25 cases) in the 4 mg dose group, 57% (12/21 cases) in the 8 mg dose group and 83% (20/24 cases) in the 12 mg dose group, without a statistically significant difference among 3 dose groups. Hence, it was estimated that the low dose of 4 mg was adequate to exert satisfactory anti-emetic effects. No clear relationship between onset time of the initial emetic episode and plasma concentrations of Ondansetron was found in 16 cases of the 4 mg dose group, 11 cases in the 8 mg dose group and 15 cases in the 12 mg dose group. Side effects observed during this study period were headache and diarrhea in 1 case in the 12 mg dose group. Both symptoms were mild and resolved without treatment. No abnormal findings attributable to Ondansetron were observed in clinical laboratory test. From the above, it was considered that Ondansetron given by a single intravenous injection was highly effective to inhibit nausea and emesis induced by cisplatin, and was highly safe. As to the dose, 4 mg once daily was considered to be adequate for prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced nausea and emesis.

A phase II study of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) tablets for breast cancer was done at 31 institutions in Japan. Forty-five patients were registered and 44 of them were eligible for the study. Of the 40 patients whose results could be evaluated, 11 (28%) responded (four complete responses and seven partial responses). Side effects, such as diarrhea, anorexia, leukocytopenia, and liver dysfunction were observed in 24 of the 44 patients. The side effects were mild and transient. 5'-DFUR is a promising drug for breast cancer treatment, and its tablet form makes chemotherapy easier for the patient.

EAP therapy has been performed on 50 cases of advanced gastric cancer from January 1988 to September 1989. Adriamycin 20 mg/m2, Cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and Etoposide 100 mg/m2 were administered on day 1 and 7, 2 and 8, and 4, 5 and 6, respectively, with not less than 2 courses every 3 to 4 weeks. Complete success, PR, NC and PD were obtained in 48, 21, 20 and 7 cases, respectively, the rate of effectiveness being 43.8% with a confidence interval 95% of 30-58%. The rate of effectiveness by lesions for evaluation was high (30.4, 100, and 50% for primary lesion, Virchow's lymphnodal metastasis and liver metastasis, respectively). MST was 5.1 months for EAP therapy, which was highly effective but led to no prolonged survival period. Thus, it is thought that good control of leukopenia, a dose limiting factor remains to be examined.