Search

Background: When gastric mesenchymal tumors (GMTs) measuring 2–5 cm in size are found, whether to undergo further treatment or not is controversial. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is useful for the evaluation of malignant potential of GMTs, but has limitations, such as subjective interpretation of EUS images. Therefore, we aimed to develop a scoring system based on the digital image analysis of EUS images to predict gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Methods: We included 103 patients with histopathologically proven GIST, leiomyoma or schwannoma on surgically resected specimen who underwent EUS examination between January 2007 and June 2018. After standardization of the EUS images, brightness values, including the mean (Tmean), indicative of echogenicity, and the standard deviation (TSD), indicative of heterogeneity, in the tumors were analyzed. Results: Age, Tmean, and TSD were significantly higher in GISTs than in non-GISTs. The sensitivity and specificity were almost optimized for differentiating GISTs from non-GISTs when the critical values of age, Tmean, and TSD were 57.5 years, 67.0, and 25.6, respectively. A GIST-predicting scoring system was created by assigning 3 points for Tmean ≥ 67, 2 points for age ≥ 58 years, and 1 point for TSD ≥ 26. When GMTs with 3 points or more were diagnosed as GISTs, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the scoring system were 86.5%, 75.9%, and 83.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The scoring system based on the information of digital image analysis is useful in predicting GISTs in case of GMTs that are 2–5 cm in size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data concerning the long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus surgery for early gastric cancer (EGC) are limited. We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of ESD and surgery for patients with EGC. Methods: Data were reviewed from patients treated by ESD or surgery for EGC in 2005-2010. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), treatment-related complications, and hospital stay duration. Results: Among 617 patients, 342 underwent ESD and 275 underwent surgery. The 5-year OS rates were similar between the ESD group and the surgery group (96.9% vs 98.1%, P = 0.581). In a propensity-score-matched analysis of 117 pairs, there were no significant differences in the OS rates (96.5% vs 99.1%, P = 0.125) and DSS rates (100% vs 99.1%, P = 0.317) between the ESD group and the surgery group. The ESD group had a significantly lower DFS rate (90.3% vs 98.0%, P = 0.002), a significantly lower RFS rate (95.1% vs 98.0%, P = 0.033), a significantly higher early complication rate (6.7% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001), a significantly lower late complication rate (0% vs 9.1%, P < 0.001), and a significantly shorter median hospital stay (3 days vs 10 days, P < 0.001) than the surgery group. Conclusions: ESD and surgery have comparable OS rates in patients with EGC. ESD has benefits, including a lower late complication rate and shorter hospital stay. However, RFS and DFS rates might be lower after ESD than after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]