Search

Duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) following esophagectomy or gastrectomy can cause severe esophagitis, which impairs patients' quality of life and increases the risk of esophageal carcinogenesis. It is sometimes resistant to medical treatment, and surgical treatment is considered effective in such cases. However, an optimal operative procedure for medical treatment-resistant reflux esophagitis (RE) after proximal gastrectomy (PG) with esophagogastrostomy (EG) has not yet been established. We performed the right gastroepiploic vessels-preserving antrectomy and Roux-en-Y biliary diversion in a 70-year-old man with medical treatment-resistant severe esophagitis caused by DGER following PG with EG for esophagogastric junction cancer. The postoperative course was uneventful, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed on the 19th postoperative day showed marked improvement in the esophageal erosions. The patient reported symptomatic relief. The right gastroepiploic vessels-preserving antrectomy and Roux-en-Y biliary diversion were considered safe and feasible for medical treatment-resistant RE following PG with EG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In proximal gastrectomy (PG), a longer distal margin (DM) length should be maintained to obtain a pathologically negative DM. However, a shorter DM length is preferred to preserve a large remnant stomach for favorable postoperative outcomes. Evidence regarding the minimum DM length to ensure a pathologically negative DM is useful. Methods: Patients who underwent PG or total gastrectomy for cT1N0M0 gastric cancer limited to the upper third were enrolled. A new parameter, ΔDM, which corresponded to the pathological extension distal to the gross tumor boundary towards the resection stump, was evaluated. The maximum ΔDM, which is the length ensuring a pathologically negative DM, was first determined. Furthermore, the possible incidences of pathologically positive DM were calculated for each pathological type and clinical tumor (cTumor) size. Results: Of 361 patients eligible for this study, 190 and 171 were assigned to differentiated (Dif) and undifferentiated types (Und), respectively. The maximum ΔDM was 30 and 40 mm in Dif and Und, respectively. Considering a correlation between cTumor size and ΔDM, and possible incidences of pathologically positive DM, 10, 20, and 30 mm were the minimal gross DM lengths in Dif when cTumor size was ≤ 15 mm, > 15 and ≤ 50 mm, and > 50 mm, respectively. In Und, the incidences of pathologically positive DM were 0.59% and 2.3% for gross DM lengths of 30 and 20 mm, respectively. Conclusion: The minimum DM lengths to ensure a pathologically negative DM in PG are proposed according to the pathological type of early upper gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The appropriate surgical procedure for patients with upper third early gastric cancer is controversial. We compared total gastrectomy (TG) with proximal gastrectomy (PG) in this patient population. Methods: A multicenter, non-randomized trial was conducted, with patients treated with PG or TG. We compared short- and long-term outcomes between these procedures. Results: Between 2009 and 2014, we enrolled 254 patients from 22 institutions; data from 252 were included in the analysis. These 252 patients were assigned to either the PG (n = 159) or TG (n = 93) group. Percentage of body weight loss (%BWL) at 1 year after surgery, i.e., the primary endpoint, in the PG group was significantly less than that of the TG group (− 12.8% versus − 16.9%; p = 0.0001). For short-term outcomes, operation time was significantly shorter for PG than TG (252 min versus 303 min; p < 0.0001), but there were no group-dependent differences in blood loss and postoperative complications. For long-term outcomes, incidence of reflux esophagitis in the PG group was significantly higher than that of the TG group (14.5% versus 5.4%; p = 0.02), while there were no differences in the incidence of anastomotic stenosis between the two (5.7% versus 5.4%; p = 0.92). Overall patient survival rates were similar between the two groups (3-year survival rates: 96% versus 92% in the PG and TG groups, respectively; p = 0.49). Conclusions: Patients who underwent PG were better able to control weight loss without worsening the prognosis, relative to those in the TG group. Optimization of a reconstruction method to reduce reflux in PG patients will be important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The incidence of metachronous multiple gastric cancer (MMGC) after gastrectomy remains unclear. This study evaluated the incidences of MMGC according to specific gastrectomy types, including pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), proximal gastrectomy (PG), and function-preserving gastrectomy (FPG), which was categorized as segmental gastrectomy and local resection. Methods: We conducted a questionnaire survey of the Japanese Society for Gastro-Surgical Pathophysiology members, who were asked to report their institutional numbers of radical gastrectomy cases for cancer between 2003 and 2012. The cases were categorized according to whether the remnant stomach's status was followed for > 5 years, confirmation of MMGC, time to diagnosis, and treatment for MMGC. We calculated the "precise incidence" of MMGC by dividing the number of MMGC cases by the number of cases in which the status of remnant stomach was followed up for > 5 years. Results: The responses identified 33,731 cases of gastrectomy. The precise incidences of MMGC were 2.35% after distal gastrectomy (DG), 3.01% after PPG, 6.28% after PG (p < 0.001), and 8.21% after FPG (p < 0.001). A substantial proportion of MMGCs (36.4%) was found at 5 years after the initial surgery. The rates of MMGC treatment using endoscopic submucosal dissection were 31% after DG, 28.6% after PPG, 50.8% after PG (p < 0.001), and 67.9% after FPG (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The incidence of MMGC was 2.4% after DG, and higher incidences were observed for larger stomach remnants. However, the proportion of cases in which MMGC could be treated using endoscopic submucosal dissection was significantly higher after PG and FPG than after DG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It remains unclear whether total gastrectomy is necessary for patients with proximal T2/T3 gastric cancer. To explore the oncological safety of proximal gastrectomy for proximal T2/T3 gastric cancer, in this study, we evaluated the metastatic rates in and the therapeutic effect of dissection of key distal lymph node stations that are usually excluded in proximal gastrectomy. Methods: In this study, we examined 202 patients seen between January 2000 and December 2012, who underwent total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection (D1/D1+/D2; 2/17/183) and was pathologically diagnosed as T2/T3 gastric cancer exclusively located in the upper third of the stomach. The theoretical therapeutic necessity of dissecting lymph nodes at each lymph node station was evaluated based on the therapeutic index calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis at each station and the 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis to that station. Results: The 5-year overall survival rate (95% confidence interval) was 72.9% (65.5–80.3). The metastatic rates at #4d and #12a were very low (0.99% and 0.006%, respectively), and those at #5 and #6 were zero, and therapeutic indices for #4d, #5, #6 and #12a were zero. On the other hand, the most frequent metastatic station was #3, followed by #1, #2 and #7 (overall metastatic rate > 12%), which was consistent with the order of the therapeutic indices. Conclusions: Considering the nodal stations that need to be dissected, proximal gastrectomy would be the choice and oncologically safe for patients with T2/T3 proximal gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes including postoperative complications and prognosis between total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for proximal gastric cancer (GC). Propensity-score-matching analysis was performed to overcome patient selection bias between the two surgical techniques.Methods: Among 457 patients who were diagnosed with GC between January 1990 and December 2010 from four Italian institutions, 91 underwent PG and 366 underwent TG. Clinicopathologic features, postoperative complications, and survivals were reviewed and compared between these two groups retrospectively.Results: After propensity-score matching had been done, 150 patients (75 TG patients, 75 PG patients) were included in the analysis. The PG group had smaller tumors, shorter resection margins, and smaller numbers of retrieved lymph nodes than the TG group. N stages and 5-year survival rates were similar after TG and PG. Postoperative complication rates after PG and TG were 25.3 and 28%, respectively, (P = 0.084). Rates of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture were 12 and 6.6% after PG and 2.6 and 1.3% after TG, respectively (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002). 5-year overall survival for PG and TG group was 56.7 and 46.5%, respectively (P = 0.07). Survival rates according to the tumor stage were not different between the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that type of resection was not an independent prognostic factor.Conclusion: Although PG for upper third GC showed good results in terms of survival, it is associated with an increased mortality rate and a higher risk of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: No optimal method of reconstruction for proximal gastrectomy has been established because of problems associated with postoperative reflux and anastomotic stenosis. It is also important that the reconstruction is easily performed laparoscopically because laparoscopic gastrectomy has become widely accepted in recent years. Methods: We have developed a new method of esophagogastrostomy, side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita (SOFY). The remnant stomach is fixated to the diaphragmatic crus on the dorsal side of the esophagus. The esophagus and the remnant stomach are overlapped by a length of 5 cm. A linear stapler is inserted in two holes on the left side of the esophageal stump and the anterior gastric wall. The stapler is rotated counterclockwise on its axis and fired. The entry hole is closed, and the right side of the esophagus is fixated to the stomach so that the esophagus sticks flat to the gastric wall. The surgical outcomes of the SOFY method were compared with those of esophagogastrectomy different from SOFY. Results: Thirteen of the 14 patients in the SOFY group were asymptomatic without a proton pump inhibitor, but reflux esophagitis was observed in 5 of the 16 patients in the non-SOFY group and anastomotic stenosis was observed in 3 patients. Contrast enhancement findings in the SOFY group showed inflow of Gastrografin to the remnant stomach was extremely good, and no reflux into the esophagus was observed even with patients in the head-down tilt position. Conclusions: SOFY can be easily performed laparoscopically and may overcome the problems of postoperative reflux and stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Proximal gastrectomy has been introduced for early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach, but expansion of its indication to advanced tumors has not been generally accepted in terms of lesser curvature lymph node dissection. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 385 patients with tumors in the upper third of the stomach, and the incidence of metastasis and the therapeutic index related to the proximal (no. 3a) and distal (no. 3b) lymph nodes of the lesser curvature were analyzed and compared with those of tumors in the middle third ( n = 1093) and lower third ( n = 922) of the stomach. Results: The no. 3a rate of metastasis from advanced tumors in the upper third of the stomach was significantly higher than that from tumors in the middle third or lower third of the stomach. The no. 3b metastasis rate did not show any significant differences between the three locations, but the therapeutic index of no. 3b lymph nodes in the upper third of the stomach (1.7) was far lower than that in the middle third (7.1) or lower third (7.0). Further, the rate of metastasis from tumors with the distal border ending in the upper third of the stomach (2.2 %) was significantly ( P < 0.0001) lower than that from tumors located in the upper third of the stomach but extending to the middle third (19.6 %), as well as from tumors located in middle third (17.1 %) or lower third (19.6 %), with the therapeutic index being only 1.1. The four no.-3b-positive tumors all measured more than 40 mm, and included one T3 tumor and three T4 tumors. Conclusion: Proximal gastrectomy with exclusion of no. 3b lymphadenectomy could be indicated for at least T2 tumors measuring less than 40 mm localized in the upper third of the stomach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinoma has attracted considerable attention because of the marked increase in its incidence globally. However, the optimal extent of esophagogastric resection for this tumor entity remains highly controversial. Methods: This was a questionnaire-based national retrospective study undertaken in an attempt to define the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for EGJ cancer. Data from patients with EGJ carcinoma, less than 40 mm in diameter, who underwent R0 resection between January 2001 and December 2010 were reviewed. Results: Clinical records of 2807 patients without preoperative therapy were included in the analysis. There are distinct disparities in terms of the nodal dissection rate according to histology and the predominant tumor location. Nodal metastases frequently involved the abdominal nodes, especially those at the right and left cardia, lesser curvature and along the left gastric artery. Nodes along the distal portion of the stomach were much less often metastatic, and their dissection seemed unlikely to be beneficial. Lower mediastinal node dissection might contribute to improving survival for patients with esophagus-predominant EGJ cancer. However, due to low dissection rates for nodes of the middle and upper mediastinum, no conclusive result was obtained regarding the optimal extent of nodal dissection in this region. Conclusions: Complete nodal clearance along the distal portion of the stomach offers marginal survival benefits for patients with EGJ cancers less than 4 cm in diameter. The optimal extent of esophageal resection and the benefits of mediastinal node dissection remain issues to be addressed in managing patients with esophagus-predominant EGJ cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: An optimal reconstruction method for proximal gastrectomy (PG) remains elusive. Esophagogastrostomy (EG) is technically simple but suffers from the disadvantage of gastroesophageal reflux. Jejunal interposition (JI) has a low rate of gastroesophageal reflux, but the procedure is more complicated, and delayed gastric emptying is a problem. Methods: We created a modified EG and have used the modified technique for PG since 2006. The procedure involves shaping the remnant stomach into a gastric conduit. The EG is performed high on the anterior wall, and the conduit is kept straight by applying a circular stapler inserted from the anterior wall of the antrum. The tip of the gastric conduit is then inserted into the lower mediastinum, creating a sharp angle of His. In this retrospective cohort study, the clinical and physiological outcomes were compared between 25 patients who underwent this procedure and 21 patients who underwent JI from 2001 to 2005. Results: Laparoscopic procedures were performed more frequently, and residual food and bile reflux were less common in the EG group than in the JI group. No significant differences in remnant gastritis or reflux esophagitis were observed between the two groups. However, the late complication of intestinal obstruction occurred only in the JI group. Conclusions: The modified EG technique has advantages over the JI technique because of its simplicity and low incidence of residual food and bile reflux. The next step would be to explore this technique further by a prospective multi-institutional study to confirm the reproducibility of its benefits. Miniabstract: The modified EG technique has advantages over the JI technique because of its simplicity, high rate of laparoscopy use, and low incidence of gastroesophageal reflux. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although proximal gastrectomy (PG) is widely accepted as a function-preserving operation for early upper-third gastric cancer, postoperative disorders, such as reflux or gastric stasis, have often been pointed out. From the perspective of postoperative disorder, the choice of total gastrectomy (TG) or PG for such cancers is still controversial. By using the newly developed Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45, the quality of life after TG and PG was compared. Methods: The PGSAS-45 consists of 45 items composed of the SF-8 and GSRS scales and 22 new items. The main outcomes are measured by seven subscales (SS) covering symptoms, physical and mental component summary (SF-8), meals (amount and quality), ability to work, dissatisfaction for daily life, and change in body weight. A total of 2,368 eligible questionnaires were acquired from 52 institutions. From these, 393 patients with TG and 193 patients with PG were selected and compared. Results: The PG was better than TG in terms of body weight loss (TG 13.8 % vs. PG 10.9 %; p = 0.003), necessity for additional meals (2.4 vs. 2.0; p < 0.001), diarrhea SS (2.3 vs. 2.0; p = 0.048), and dumping SS (2.3 vs. 2.0; p = 0.043). There were no differences in the other main outcome measures. Conclusions: Proximal gastrectomy appears to be valuable as a function-preserving procedure for early upper-third gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Widespread application of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) results in noncurative resection in some patients. The influence of preceding ESD on additional gastric resections has not been completely evaluated. Methods: Endoscopic, surgical, and pathological records of 255 patients who underwent additional gastrectomy after noncurative ESD at a single prefectural cancer center from September 2002 to December 2010 were reviewed. The estimated gastric resection based on endoscopic images before ESD was compared with the actual gastric resection performed after ESD. Results: Altered gastric resection was performed in 4 (1.6 %) of the 255 patients. In 3 patients, total gastrectomy was performed instead of distal gastrectomy; in 1 patient, distal gastrectomy was performed instead of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy because of an insufficient distance from the cardia or pylorus caused by contraction of the ESD scar. Standard gastrectomy including total or distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was performed in 33 patients because of deep submucosal invasion with positive/indefinite vertical margins. The final pathology revealed pT2 or deeper in 10 patients. Conclusions: In conclusion, 98.4 % patients underwent the scheduled gastric resection before ESD, and the preceding gastric ESD had almost no influence on changing the gastric resection of the additional surgery. Although rare, the preceding ESD may necessitate alterations in gastric resection to widen the surgical area because of contraction of ESD scar for lesions near the cardia or pylorus. Mini abstract: A retrospective study of additional gastrectomy after noncurative ESD showed that the preceding ESD had almost no influence on changing the gastric resection of the additional surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Proximal gastrectomy is not routinely performed because it is associated with increased reflux symptoms and anastomotic strictures. The purpose of this study is to describe a novel method of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) with double-tract reconstruction (DTR) for proximal early gastric cancer (EGC), and to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and short-term surgical outcomes, especially reflux symptoms, after LPG. Methods: Retrospective review of the prospective cohort data of 43 patients who presented to a single tertiary hospital from June 2009 through April 2012 and underwent LPG with DTR for proximal EGC. The data of this prospective cohort were analyzed, and the reflux symptoms, clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical outcomes, postoperative morbidities and mortalities, and follow-up findings were analyzed. Results: The mean surgical time was 180.7 min; mean estimated blood loss, 120.4 mL; mean length of the proximal resection margin, 4.13 cm; mean number of retrieved lymph nodes, 41.2; and mean postoperative hospital stay, 7.1 days. Early complication rate was 11.6 % ( n = 5); major complication (grade higher than Clavien-Dindo IIIa) occurred in 1 patient (2.3 %). Late complication rate was 11.6 % ( n = 5): 2 patients had esophagojejunostomy stenosis, which was successfully treated with fluoroscopic balloon dilatations; 1, chylous ascites; and 2 had Visick grade II reflux symptoms (4.6 %), managed by medication during the mean follow-up period of 21.6 months. Conclusion: DTR after LPG is a feasible, simple, and novel reconstruction method with excellent postoperative outcomes in terms of preventing reflux symptoms. Its clinical applicability must be validated by prospective randomized trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Because the incidence of early gastric cancers has been increasing in Asian countries, postoperative quality of life has received considerable attention in addition to oncological outcomes. Methods: Eighty-four patients with clinically early gastric cancers were enrolled in this retrospective study. Among them, 35 patients underwent total gastrectomy (TG) and 49 patients underwent limited proximal gastrectomy (PG). Blood chemistry, changes in body weight, and oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Postoperative hemoglobin levels and body weights were significantly lower in the TG group than in the PG group, and there were no significant differences in the levels of other nutritional indicators such as serum total protein and total cholesterol. However, the overall survival rates of patients in the PG group were similar to those of patients in the TG group (5-year survival rates, 95 versus 97 %, respectively; p = 0.86). Conclusions: Limited proximal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection has possible positive effects on maintaining body weight and preventing postgastrectomy anemia with similar oncological outcomes to total gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The choice of surgical strategy for patients with proximal gastric cancer is controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and surgical and functional outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG). Methods: Between June 2003 and December 2009, 131 patients with proximal gastric cancer underwent LAPG ( n = 50) or LATG ( n = 81) at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. We reviewed their medical and surgical records from our prospectively collected gastric cancer database. The clinicopathologic characteristics and short-term, long-term, and functional outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Results: There were no significant differences in demographics, T-stage, N-stage, or survival between the 2 groups. The LAPG group had a shorter operative time and lower estimated blood loss than the LATG group. The early complication rates after the LAPG and LATG procedures were 24.0 and 17.3 %, respectively ( p = 0.349). The incidence of reflux symptoms was significantly higher in the LAPG group (32.0 vs. 3.7 %, p < 0.001). The parameters that reflected nutritional status were similar in the 2 groups. Conclusion: LAPG is a feasible and acceptable method for treating proximal early gastric cancer in terms of surgical and oncologic safety. However, esophagogastrostomy after LAPG was associated with an increased risk of reflux symptoms. Antireflux procedures should be considered to prevent reflux symptoms after LAPG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proximal gastrectomy has been applied for selected patients with early upper gastric cancer, because of its potential advantages over total gastrectomy, such as preserving gastric capacity and entailing fewer hormonal and nutritional deficiencies. Esophago-gastric anastomosis is a simple reconstruction method with an excellent postoperative outcome provided that gastroesophageal reflux is properly prevented. Following open surgery, the esophagus is anastomosed to the anterior stomach wall with partial fundoplication to prevent esophageal reflux. We developed a novel laparoscopic hand-sewn method to reproduce the anti-reflux procedure that is used in open surgery. The esophagus is first fixed to the anterior stomach wall with a knifeless endoscopic linear stapler. This fixation contributes to maintaining a stable field for easier hand-sewn anastomosis, and allows us to complete the left side of the fundoplication at the same time. This novel technique was used to successfully perform complete laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with a hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis in ten patients, without any postoperative complications. No patient had symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux during a median follow-up period of 19.9 months. One patient developed anastomotic stenosis, and this was resolved with endoscopic dilatation. The mean percent body weight loss at 12 months after surgery, in comparison to the preoperative weight, was 10.4 %. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with an esophago-gastric anastomosis using our novel technique would be a feasible choice would be a feasible choice and would show benefit for selected patients with early upper gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to clarify the frequency and clinicopathological characteristics of gastric stump carcinoma following proximal gastrectomy. Three-hundred and sixteen patients who had undergone curative proximal gastrectomy over a 21-year period from January 1984 through December 2004 were reviewed. Gastric stump carcinoma was observed in 17 patients (5.4%). The time interval between the initial gastrectomy and the treatment of gastric stump cancer was within 5 years in 3 patients, within 5–10 years in 8, and after 10 years in 6. Treatment included endoscopic resection ( n = 4), completion total gastrectomy of the remnant stomach ( n = 11), pancreatoduodenectomy ( n = 1), and nonsurgical resection ( n = 1). Pathologically, 9 carcinomas were differentiated and 8 were undifferentiated. In a review of reconstruction methods associated with disease stage, stage I was found in 6 of the 7 patients with esophagogastrostomy or short-segment jejunal interposition. On the other hand, stage I was found in only 3, but stage II–IV was found in 7 of the 10 patients with reconstruction by double-tract or long-segment jejunal interposition; thus, the tumor was more likely to be detected at an advanced stage after long-segment interposition ( P = 0.049). Gastric stump carcinoma following proximal gastrectomy occurred at a high frequency of 5.4% of initial resections. It is necessary to select a reconstruction method that facilitates postoperative endoscopic examination, as well as to follow up the patients after proximal gastrectomy in the long term for the early detection and early treatment of gastric stump carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surgery currently is the only curative option in the treatment of gastric cancer. For early gastric cancer, an endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is adequate for intramucosal cancer less than 2 cm in diameter without ulcer. For early cancers ineligible for EMR, limited surgical operation (proximal gastrectomy, segmental resection, and pylorus-preserving distal gastrectomy) can be recommended to reduce surgical risk and achieve improvements in quality of life without decreasing survival. Subtotal/total gastrectomy plus D2 lymph node dissection is the standard surgery for advanced gastric cancer in Japan. Pancreas-preserving total gastrectomy is recommended due to the reduced risk of pancreatic fistula and postoperative diabetes. Regarding extended surgery, results of a phase III study to evaluate the role of paraaortic node dissection will be analyzed in a few years' time after the accrual of more than 500 patients in a Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) study. For scirrhous gastric cancer, left upper abdominal exenteration appears to be associated with improved survival and should be tested in another controlled trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In order to improve anastomotic procedures, we performed laparoscopic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy, using a linear stapler, after proximal gastrectomy in two patients with gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach. The patients' postoperative courses were excellent. During postoperative recovery, the patients experienced very little pain, used no analgesic medications, and never experienced reflux esophagitis. This procedure is technically feasible and is an excellent option, given the less involved anastomotic procedure and better postoperative quality of life compared with these features in end-to-side anastomosis using a circular stapler. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The frequency of tumors in the upper one-third of the stomach has been increasing. The standard operation for proximal gastric cancer has been total or proximal gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to present the pathologic and surgical results of 30 patients with early-stage proximal gastric cancer managed by proximal gastrectomy. Methods. A consecutive series of 30 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy for early-stage proximal gastric cancer was studied. Sixteen patients underwent jejunal interposition, while 14 underwent gastric tube reconstruction, which consisted of a direct anastomosis between the esophagus and the remnant of the tube-like stomach. Results. Twenty patients (67%) had no abdominal symptoms and the lesions were detected by screening gastric fiberscopy. The tumors were mostly located along the lesser curvature (73%), were grossly depressed type (IIc) (70%), and histologically well differentiated type (63%). The depth of wall invasion was the mucosa in 12 patients, submucosa in 15, and muscularis propria in 3; lymph node metastasis was absent in 28 patients (93%). When compared with patients with jejunal interposition, patients with gastric tube reconstruction had a shorter operation time (327 vs 165 min), less blood loss (508 vs 151 g), and shorter hospital stay after operation (31 vs 17 days). Endoscopy and 24-h pH monitoring showed no evidence of reflux esophagitis, except in 1 patient with gastric tube reconstruction, and no patient died of recurrence. Conclusions. Early-stage proximal gastric cancer can be successfully treated by proximal gastrectomy. Since gastric tube reconstruction is a simple, easy, and safe procedure, proximal gastrectomy followed by gastric tube reconstruction is recommended for patients with early-stage proximal gastric cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the standard operation for early cancer of gastric cardia is proximal gastrectomy followed by jejunal interposition, we recently reported a simple and useful technique for proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. The operative procedures included resection of the proximal two-thirds of the stomach, followed by anastomosis between the esophagus and gastric tube, using a circular stapler (Proximate ILS 25; Ethicon, Cincinnati, OH, USA). The gastric tube was about 20 cm long and 4 cm wide. The patient a 76-year-old man had no reflux symptoms such as heartburn, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation. Endoscopy showed no evidence of reflux esophagitis, including mucosal redness, erosion, and ulceration. Ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring indicated that the pH of the lower esophagus was between 6 and 8 when the patient was upright and between 5 and 7 when he was in the supine position. There were nine reflux episodes during the day, and no reflux episode while he was asleep. The duration of each reflux episode was less than 1 min, and the total reflux time was 1 min in the 12-h day (0.1%). These data indicate that reconstruction by gastric tube may prevent esophageal reflux in patients who have undergone proximal gastrectomy for early cancer of the gastric cardia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]